Indexed In : Science Citation Index Expanded(SCIE), MEDLINE,
Pubmed/Pubmed Central, Elsevier Bibliographic, Google Scholar,
Databases(Scopus & Embase), KCI, KoreaMed, DOAJ
Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut atnd Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. +MORE
| Yong Chan Lee |
Professor of Medicine Director, Gastrointestinal Research Laboratory Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Univ. California San Francisco San Francisco, USA |
| Jong Pil Im | Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
| Robert S. Bresalier | University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA |
| Steven H. Itzkowitz | Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY, USA |
All papers submitted to Gut and Liver are reviewed by the editorial team before being sent out for an external peer review to rule out papers that have low priority, insufficient originality, scientific flaws, or the absence of a message of importance to the readers of the Journal. A decision about these papers will usually be made within two or three weeks.
The remaining articles are usually sent to two reviewers. It would be very helpful if you could suggest a selection of reviewers and include their contact details. We may not always use the reviewers you recommend, but suggesting reviewers will make our reviewer database much richer; in the end, everyone will benefit. We reserve the right to return manuscripts in which no reviewers are suggested.
The final responsibility for the decision to accept or reject lies with the editors. In many cases, papers may be rejected despite favorable reviews because of editorial policy or a lack of space. The editor retains the right to determine publication priorities, the style of the paper, and to request, if necessary, that the material submitted be shortened for publication.
Split Viewer
Joo Kyung Park*, Yong Bum Yoon*, Yong-Tae Kim*, Ji Kon Ryu*, Won Jae Yoon*, Sang Hyub Lee*, Su-Jong Yu*, Hae Yeon Kang*, Jae Young Lee†, and Min Jung Park‡
Correspondence to: Yong Bum Yoon
Gut Liver 2008;2(2):88-94. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2008.2.2.88
Published online November 30, -0001, Published date September 30, 2008
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
Background/Aims: Gallbladder (GB) polyps are commonly encountered in clinical practice, and are found more frequently as the number of medical screening examinations increases. The aim of this study was to determine optimal practice guideline for surgical treatment and follow-up of GB polyps. Methods: Data from healthy subjects of Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) Health Care System of Gangnam Center were used to investigate the true prevalence of GB polyps. We also enrolled 689 patients with GB polyps diagnosed at SNUH from May 1st, 1988 to April 30th, 2006. Results: The GB polyp prevalence was 6.1% (7.1% in males and 4.8% in females). The median follow-up duration in the 689 study patients was 60 months, and 139 (20%) of them had polyps ≥10 mm in size. Twenty-five of the 180 patients who underwent cholecystectomy had adenocarcinomas. The 2 test was used to identify which of the following were risk factors of malignancy: age, sex, symptoms, size, rate of growth, multiplicity, accompanying stones, and shape. Age (≥57 years), presence of symptoms, size (≥10 mm), and shape (sessile) were found to be statistically significant risk factors by univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis identified only age (≥57 years) and size (≥10 mm) as independent predictors of malignancy. Conclusions: The present study shows that GB polyps ≥10 mm in size in patients aged ≥57 years are the independent factors predicting malignancy of the GB. (Gut and Liver 2008;2:88-94)
Keywords: Gallbladder, Polyp, Cholecystectomy
Gut and Liver 2008; 2(2): 88-94
Published online September 30, 2008 https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2008.2.2.88
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
Joo Kyung Park*, Yong Bum Yoon*, Yong-Tae Kim*, Ji Kon Ryu*, Won Jae Yoon*, Sang Hyub Lee*, Su-Jong Yu*, Hae Yeon Kang*, Jae Young Lee†, and Min Jung Park‡
Departments of *Internal Medicine, †Diagnostic Radiology, and ‡Health Care System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to:Yong Bum Yoon
Background/Aims: Gallbladder (GB) polyps are commonly encountered in clinical practice, and are found more frequently as the number of medical screening examinations increases. The aim of this study was to determine optimal practice guideline for surgical treatment and follow-up of GB polyps. Methods: Data from healthy subjects of Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) Health Care System of Gangnam Center were used to investigate the true prevalence of GB polyps. We also enrolled 689 patients with GB polyps diagnosed at SNUH from May 1st, 1988 to April 30th, 2006. Results: The GB polyp prevalence was 6.1% (7.1% in males and 4.8% in females). The median follow-up duration in the 689 study patients was 60 months, and 139 (20%) of them had polyps ≥10 mm in size. Twenty-five of the 180 patients who underwent cholecystectomy had adenocarcinomas. The 2 test was used to identify which of the following were risk factors of malignancy: age, sex, symptoms, size, rate of growth, multiplicity, accompanying stones, and shape. Age (≥57 years), presence of symptoms, size (≥10 mm), and shape (sessile) were found to be statistically significant risk factors by univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis identified only age (≥57 years) and size (≥10 mm) as independent predictors of malignancy. Conclusions: The present study shows that GB polyps ≥10 mm in size in patients aged ≥57 years are the independent factors predicting malignancy of the GB. (Gut and Liver 2008;2:88-94)
Keywords: Gallbladder, Polyp, Cholecystectomy
pISSN 1976-2283
eISSN 2005-1212
Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut atnd Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. +MORE
| Yong Chan Lee |
Professor of Medicine Director, Gastrointestinal Research Laboratory Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Univ. California San Francisco San Francisco, USA |
| Jong Pil Im | Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
| Robert S. Bresalier | University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA |
| Steven H. Itzkowitz | Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY, USA |
All papers submitted to Gut and Liver are reviewed by the editorial team before being sent out for an external peer review to rule out papers that have low priority, insufficient originality, scientific flaws, or the absence of a message of importance to the readers of the Journal. A decision about these papers will usually be made within two or three weeks.
The remaining articles are usually sent to two reviewers. It would be very helpful if you could suggest a selection of reviewers and include their contact details. We may not always use the reviewers you recommend, but suggesting reviewers will make our reviewer database much richer; in the end, everyone will benefit. We reserve the right to return manuscripts in which no reviewers are suggested.
The final responsibility for the decision to accept or reject lies with the editors. In many cases, papers may be rejected despite favorable reviews because of editorial policy or a lack of space. The editor retains the right to determine publication priorities, the style of the paper, and to request, if necessary, that the material submitted be shortened for publication.
PDF
Standard view
Export citation
Share 
