Indexed In : Science Citation Index Expanded(SCIE), MEDLINE,
Pubmed/Pubmed Central, Elsevier Bibliographic, Google Scholar,
Databases(Scopus & Embase), KCI, KoreaMed, DOAJ
Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut atnd Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. +MORE
Yong Chan Lee |
Professor of Medicine Director, Gastrointestinal Research Laboratory Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Univ. California San Francisco San Francisco, USA |
Jong Pil Im | Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
Robert S. Bresalier | University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA |
Steven H. Itzkowitz | Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY, USA |
All papers submitted to Gut and Liver are reviewed by the editorial team before being sent out for an external peer review to rule out papers that have low priority, insufficient originality, scientific flaws, or the absence of a message of importance to the readers of the Journal. A decision about these papers will usually be made within two or three weeks.
The remaining articles are usually sent to two reviewers. It would be very helpful if you could suggest a selection of reviewers and include their contact details. We may not always use the reviewers you recommend, but suggesting reviewers will make our reviewer database much richer; in the end, everyone will benefit. We reserve the right to return manuscripts in which no reviewers are suggested.
The final responsibility for the decision to accept or reject lies with the editors. In many cases, papers may be rejected despite favorable reviews because of editorial policy or a lack of space. The editor retains the right to determine publication priorities, the style of the paper, and to request, if necessary, that the material submitted be shortened for publication.
Can-Tong Liu1,2 , Yi-Wei Xu1,2,3
, Hong Guo4
, Chao-Qun Hong5
, Xin-Yi Huang2
, Yu-Hao Luo1
, Shi-Han Yang6
, Ling-Yu Chu2
, En- Min Li2,3,7
, Yu-Hui Peng1,2,3
Correspondence to: Yu-Hui Penga, En-Min Lib, and Yi-Wei Xuc
aDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, No.7 Raoping Road, Shantou 515041, China
Tel: +86-137-1591-2739, Fax: +86-754-8856-0352, E-mail: pengyuhui666@163.com
bDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, No.22 Xinling Road, Shantou 515041, China
Tel: +86-138-0929-1605, Fax: +86-754-8890-0847, E-mail: nmli@stu.edu.cn
cDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, No.7 Raoping Road, Shantou 515041, China
Tel: +86-159-8970-1200, Fax: +86-754-8856-0352, E-mail: yiwei512@126.com
Gut Liver 2020;14(6):727-734. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl19135
Published online December 13, 2019, Published date November 15, 2020
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
Background/Aims: Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EJA) is a malignant tumor associated with high morbidity and has attracted increasing attention due to a rising incidence and low survival rate. Pathological biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis, but noninvasive and effective tests are lacking, resulting in diagnoses at advanced stages. This study explored the diagnostic value of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) in EJA. Methods: A total of 120 EJA patients and 88 normal controls were recruited, and their serum levels of IGFBP7 were measured by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic value, and Pearson chi-square analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between IGFBP7 and clinical parameters. Kaplan- Meier survival analysis was carried out to assess the effect of IGFBP7 on overall survival (OS). Results: The levels of IGFBP7 were higher in both early- and late-stage EJA patients than in normal controls (p<0.001). The area under the ROC curve for EJA patients was 0.794 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.733 to 0.854), with a cutoff value of 2.716 ng/mL, a sensitivity of 63.3% (95% CI, 54.0% to 71.8%) and a specificity of 90.9% (95% CI, 82.4% to 95.7%). For the diagnosis of early-stage EJA, the same cutoff value and specificity were obtained, but the sensitivity of IGFBP7 was 54.3% (95% CI, 36.9% to 70.8%). Patients with low IGFBP7 protein expression had lower OS than those with high expression (p=0.034). The multivariate analysis showed that IGFBP7 is an independent prognostic factor for EJA (p=0.011). Conclusions: Serum IGFBP7 acts as a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker for EJA.
Keywords: Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-7, Esophagogastric junction, Adenocarcinoma, Diagnosis, Prognosis
In recent decades, the incidence of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EJA) has rapidly increased in both western countries and eastern Asia.1 EJA is usually divided into three different types according to the 1998 Siewert classification.2 Tumors with centers from 5 cm to 1 cm above the esophagogastric junction are defined as Siewert type I, while tumors with the centers located 1 cm above to 2 cm below the junction are type II, and tumors with centers located 2 cm to 5 cm below the junction are type III. However, in accordance to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging Manual,3 esophagogastric junction cancers with centers no more than 2 cm from the inferior esophageal sphincter are staged as esophageal adenocarcinoma (Siewert type I or II), while those more than 2 cm are staged as stomach cancers (Siewert type III).3 Overall survival (OS) for EJA is poor, with a 5-year survival of less than 25% in China.4,5 In clinical practice, the diagnosis of EJA is mostly dependent on pathological biopsy after endoscopy or surgery, both of which are invasive methods. A valuable and noninvasive method is urgently needed for early diagnosis.
The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) family is composed of IGFs, IGF receptors and IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs),6-8 which play a vital role in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis.9 Among them, IGFBP7 binds IGF-I and IGF-II with low affinity.10 However, IGFBP7 has been found to be related to several diseases, such as acute kidney injury11 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.12 Similarly, both high and low expression of IGFBP7 has been observed in various cancer tissues, such as gastric13 and colorectal cancer.14 In gastroesophageal cancer, IGFBP7 expression also correlates with pathophysiology and tumorigenesis.15 Here, we explored the potential of serum IGFBP7 levels as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for EJA.
In total, we collected 208 serum samples from the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College: 88 healthy control samples and 120 EJA samples. All participants were diagnosed to be without acute kidney injury or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. EJA patient serum samples used in this experiment were collected between July 2013 and November 2017 before surgery, and follow-up was made starting from the day of surgery. The exit date was defined as the day of death, withdrawal or completion of follow-up before December 2018. Both patients and normal controls signed informed consent to participate in this study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College and conformed to the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki. After venous sampling before surgery, serum was obtained by centrifuging blood at 2500
EJA was diagnosed by computed tomography or gastroscopy, followed by pathological examination after surgery, endoscopic mucosal resection or biopsy. All patients were accepted for surgery. We defined tumor stage according to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging Manual.3 In accordance with our previous study, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I+II was defined as early-stage EJA.16
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits for serum IGFBP-7 were purchased from Cusabio® (Catalog number: CSB-E17249h; Houston, TX, USA). The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay protocol was carried out according to the user manual. The serum samples were diluted to 1:3, while the standard was diluted to a concentration gradient of 10, 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, 0.312, and 0.156 ng/mL, respectively. The 100 μL serum sample, standard or sample diluent (acted as negative control) was added to each well and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C. After removed the liquid, 100 μL biotin-antibody (1X) and 100 μL horseradish peroxidase-avidin (1X) were added in chronological order. 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine substrate was used for color development and stop solution for the termination of color development. The measurement of optical density value of each well was executed on a plate microplate reader (BioTek® Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) within 5 minutes at 450 nm with 570 nm reference.
We first changed the optical density values to concentration according to the standard curve plotted by SigmaPlot 10.0. Then the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to evaluate the difference of IGFBP7 levels between two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic boundaries including the area under the ROC curve (AUC) with the 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity and specificity. The cutoff value was calculated by achieving the maximum sensitivity when the specificity was greater than 90%, and by minimizing the distance of the cutoff value to the top-left corner of the ROC curve. We selected a specificity of greater than 90% in order to produce a test that could be beneficial to early cancer detection.17 Correlation between clinical characteristics and the level of IGFBP7 was evaluated by the chi-square test. For optimal cut-point definition in prognostic analysis, we used the X-tile 3.6.1 software to category high and low expression of IGFBP7.18 The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess the effect of IGFBP7 on OS. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to judge the hazard ratio. In all analyses, a p<0.05 (two-tailed) was defined as significance. Statistical analyses were carried out with SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
A total of 208 patients and normal controls were analyzed (Table 1). The mean concentration±standard error of the mean (SEM) of IGFBP7 for EJA patients was 3.436±0.1998 ng/mL versus 1.821±0.0663 ng/mL and 3.863±0.5666 ng/mL in the normal control group and early-stage patient group, respectively (Table 2). Thus, early- and late-stage patients with EJA had a significant increase in level of serum IGFBP7, compared with normal controls (p<0.001) (Fig. 1). As illustrated in Fig. 1, similar result can be found in early-stage EJA patients.
We identified a cutoff value of 2.716 ng/mL for IGFBP7 to diagnose EJA by using the ROC curve to compare the EJA and normal control groups (Fig. 2). We acquired an AUC of 0.794 (95% CI, 0.733 to 0.854) with a sensitivity of 63.3% (95% CI, 54.0% to 71.8%) and a specificity of 90.9% (95% CI, 82.4% to 95.7%) (Table 3). Also, with the same cutoff value, IGFBP7 could identify early-stage EJA with a slightly lower AUC value of 0.749 (95% CI, 0.644 to 0.854), a sensitivity of 54.3% (95% CI, 36.9% to 70.8%) and a specificity of 90.9% (95% CI, 82.4% to 95.7%).
With the cutoff value of 2.716 ng/mL, we defined the positivity of the serum IGFBP7 levels for EJA patients to be over 2.716 ng/mL. Table 4 shows the relationship of serum IGFBP7 levels with clinicopathological features in EJA. IGFBP7 showed no association with any clinical data, including patient age, gender, smoking, drinking, size, depth of invasion, histological grade, lymph node status, metastasis, and early-stage versus advanced-stage groups (all p>0.05).
According to X-tile software, we set 3.436 ng/mL as the cutoff value to classify high and low expression of IGFBP7. The difference in 3-year OS for EJA patients with high IGFBP7 levels had 72.4% 3-year OS versus 59.7% for patients with low expression (Fig. 3A), and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.034). When we stratified according to staging, the same results were found in subgroups categorized with T4 (p=0.010), N1+N2+N3 (p=0.041), and III+IV (p=0.014) (Fig. 3B-D). Upon univariable analysis, IGFBP7 was a significant prognostic factor for 3-year OS of EJA patients (p=0.040) (Table 5). Upon multivariable analysis, IGFBP7 was an independent significant prognostic marker for 3-year OS (hazard ratio, 0.351; 95% CI, 0.157 to 0.786; p=0.011). Other significant variables included further metastasis (p<0.001) and depth of tumor invasion (p=0.012).
In our study, IGFBP7 was significantly higher in both early- and late-stage EJA compared to normal controls (p<0.001). For diagnosis, we achieved an AUC of 0.794 (95% CI, 0.733 to 0.854) and cutoff value of 2.716 ng/mL with sensitivity of 63.3% (95% CI, 54.0% to 71.8%) and specificity of 90.9% (95% CI, 82.4% to 95.7%) in EJA. Furthermore, we found that the level of serum IGFBP7 is not associated with any clinical parameters. However, if diagnosed with EJA, lower IGFBP7 expression may lead to the worse survival.
IGF family members regulate cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis through the MAPK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways.19 They have also been demonstrated to correlate with many cancers.20-22 IGFBP7, also named IGFBP-rP1, is one of the members in IGF family. Although it shares 30% structural homology with IGFBP1 to IGFBP6 at its N-terminal domain, as it binds to IGF with low affinity10,23 and its individual characteristics are different from IGFBP1 to IGFBP6. Methylation of IGFBP7 may reduce the expression of IGFBP7 in gastric cancer and prostate cancer and improve the tumor progression,13,24 and administration of IGFBP7 may be therapeutic for reducing breast cancer growth.25 However, prior studies investigated expression in mostly cells and tissues. Serum expression of IGFBP7 has only been studied in a few diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease12 and metabolic syndrome.26 Therefore, we evaluated the potential diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating IGFBP7 in EJA.
Early detection is one of the best methods to reduce cancer mortality and cancer burden.27 In clinical practice, endoscopy contributes to the early diagnosis of EJA.28 However, it is invasive and may produce adverse effects, such as infection, perforation, and bleeding.29 A recent study on serum autoantibody panels to detect EJA aroused our interest to identify noninvasive techniques to detect IGFBP7 in EJA patient serum.16 When accounting for the early detection of IGFBP7 in EJA, through ROC curve analysis, we found an AUC of 0.749 (95% CI, 0.644 to 0.854), which led to a sensitivity of 54.3% (95% CI, 36.9% to 70.8%) and specificity of 90.9% (95% CI, 82.4% to 95.7%). Although there was no statistical correlation between late-stage and early-stage EJA (p=0.187) (Table 4), IGFBP7 might be used as a potential biomarker for the early detection of EJA. Actually, there have been several studies on serum IGFBP7 in other cancers. Overexpression of serum IGFBP7 has been observed in high-grade soft tissue sarcoma,30 and high levels of serum IGFBP7 have been associated with positive nodal status in non-small cell lung cancer.31 However, both of them have not researched on the early-stage cancer. Additionally, our recent study has showed serum IGFBP7 might serve as a diagnostic biomarker for esophageal cancer,32 and it also made sense in early-stage esophageal cancer. Herein, although IGFBP7 is not a unique biomarker for EJA, it still may be a valuable candidate for EJA, in particular for the early detection of EJA.
Although Smith
In summary, our study offers useful information regarding the diagnostic value of serum IGFBP7 in EJA and suggests that IGFBP7 might be a potential biomarker for the detection and diagnosis of EJA. Additionally, low expression of IGFBP7, acting as an independent factor, might predict the poor prognosis of EJA. However, this was a single-institution study with a small sample size, which may lead to bias. A study with large sample size in multiple institutions should be performed to further verify the diagnostic value of IGFBP7 in EJA, especially early-stage EJA.
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972801 and 31600632); the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030307079); the Innovative and Strong School Project of Guangdong (2018KTSCX068) and the Grant for Key Disciplinary Project of Clinical Medicine under the Guangdong High-level University Development Program.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Experiments: C.T.L., Y.W.X., X.Y.H. Data analysis: C.T.L., L.Y.C., S.H.Y. Technical or material support: C.Q.H. Serum and clinical data collection: H.G., Y.H.L. Writing - original draft and review and editing: C.T.L., Y.W.X. Study design and obtained funding: Y.W.X., E.M.L., Y.H.P. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Characteristics of the Study Population
Group | EJA (n=120) | Normal (n=88) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | 3-yr survival rate (%) | p-value | No. (%) | ||
Age, yr | |||||
Mean (range) | 60 (31–82) | 56 (40–80) | |||
Sex | 0.469 | ||||
Male | 99 | 76.4 | 61 (69.3) | ||
Female | 21 | 49.5 | 27 (30.7) | ||
Smoke | 0.557 | ||||
Yes | 79 | 63.6 | - | ||
No | 41 | 69.0 | - | ||
Alcohol | 0.038 | ||||
Yes | 28 | 46.0 | - | ||
No | 92 | 71.7 | - | ||
Size of tumor, cm | 0.109 | ||||
≥5 | 72 | 60.8 | - | ||
<5 | 48 | 72.9 | - | ||
Depth of tumor invasion | 0.012 | ||||
T1+T2+T3 | 36 (7+4+25) | 79.8 | - | ||
T4 | 84 | 59.5 | - | ||
Regional lymph nodes | <0.001 | ||||
N0 | 36 | 73.3 | - | ||
N1 | 31 | 80.6 | - | ||
N2 | 30 | 66.5 | - | ||
N3 | 23 | 33.5 | - | ||
Metastasis | <0.001 | ||||
M0 | 116 | 66.9 | - | ||
M1 | 4 | 25.0 | - | ||
Histological grade | 0.019 | ||||
G1 (High) | 15 | 84.0 | - | ||
G2 (Middle) | 44 | 68.0 | - | ||
G3 (Low) | 47 | 53.2 | - | ||
Unknown | 14 | - | - | ||
TNM stage | 0.055 | ||||
I+II | 35 (9+26) | 76.8 | - | ||
III+IV | 85 (74+11) | 60.7 | - |
EJA, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.
Frequency of Circulating IGFBP7
Group | Mean±SEM | p-value | No. | Positive (%, 95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Normal controls | 1.821±0.0663 | - | 88 | 8 (9.1, 4.7–16.9) |
All EJA | 3.436±0.1998 | <0.001 | 120 | 76 (63.3, 54.4–71.4) |
Early-stage EJA | 3.863±0.5666 | <0.001 | 35 | 19 (54.3, 36.9–70.8) |
IGFBP7, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7; SEM, standard error of the mean; CI, exact confidence interval; EJA, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.
Result of the Measurement of IGFBP7 for the Diagnosis of EJA
IGFBP7 | AUC | SEN, % | SPE, % | FPS, % | FNS, % | PPV, % | NPV, % | PLR | NLR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EJA vs NC | 0.794 (0.733–0.854) |
63.3 (54.0–71.8) |
90.9 (82.4–95.7) |
9.5 (4.5–18.4) |
35.4 (27.2–44.6) |
90.5 (81.6–95.5) |
64.5 (55.4–72.8) |
6.97 (3.55–13.7) |
0.40 (0.32–0.51) |
Early-stage EJA vs NC | 0.749 (0.644–0.854) |
54.3 (36.9–70.8) |
90.9 (82.4–95.7) |
29.6 (14.5–50.3) |
16.7 (10.1–26.0) |
70.4 (49.7–85.5) |
83.3 (74.0–89.9) |
5.97 (2.89–12.4) |
0.50 (0.35–0.72) |
Numbers in brackets represent the 95% confidence interval.
IGFBP7, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7; EJA, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma; NC, normal controls; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; FPS, false-positive rate; FNS, false-negative rate; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio.
Relationship between the Positive Rate of IGFBP7 and the Clinical Data in EJA Patients
Variable | Positive | Negative | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Age, yr | 0.113 | ||
≥60 | 54 | 25 | |
<60 | 22 | 19 | |
Sex | 0.881 | ||
Male | 63 | 36 | |
Female | 13 | 8 | |
Smoke | 0.699 | ||
Yes | 51 | 28 | |
No | 25 | 16 | |
Alcohol | 0.310 | ||
Yes | 20 | 8 | |
No | 56 | 36 | |
Size of tumor, cm | 0.315 | ||
≥5 | 43 | 29 | |
<5 | 33 | 15 | |
Depth of tumor invasion | 0.620 | ||
T1+T2+T3 | 24 | 12 | |
T4 | 52 | 32 | |
Regional lymph nodes | 0.741 | ||
N0 | 22 | 14 | |
N1+N2+N3 | 54 | 30 | |
Metastasis | 1.000 | ||
M0 | 73 | 43 | |
M1 | 3 | 1 | |
Histological grade | 0.562 | ||
G1 | 9 | 6 | |
G2 | 30 | 14 | |
G3 | 27 | 20 | |
TNM grade | 0.187 | ||
Early stage (I-II) | 19 | 16 | |
Late stage (III-IV) | 57 | 28 |
Statistical significance was determined using the Pearson chi-square test. Data were from patients with tumor resection.
IGFBP7, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7; EJA, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.
Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Factors Associated with Overall Survival in Patients with EJA
Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | p-value | HR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
Age (≥60 yr vs <60 yr) | 0.995 (0.955–1.037) | 0.819 | |||
Sex (female vs male) | 0.750 (0.343–1.640) | 0.471 | |||
Smoke (yes vs no) | 1.226 (0.620–2.426) | 0.558 | |||
Alcohol (yes vs no) | 2.007 (1.025–3.931) | 0.042 | |||
Tumor size (≥5 cm vs <5 cm) | 1.759 (0.874–3.538) | 0.113 | |||
T (T4 vs T1+T2+T3) | 3.114 (1.217–7.966) | 0.018 | 3.362 (1.310–8.625) | 0.012 | |
N (N1+N2+N3 vs N0) | 1.996 (0.917–4.346) | 0.082 | |||
M (M1 vs M0) | 7.445 (2.225–24.904) | 0.001 | 11.303 (3.101–41.202) | <0.001 | |
G (G2+G3 vs G1) | 3.734 (0.897–15.553) | 0.070 | |||
pTNM-stage (III+IV vs I+II) | 2.183 (0.963–4.949) | 0.062 | |||
IGFBP7 (≥3.436 vs <3.436) | 0.433 (0.195–0.962) | 0.040 | 0.351 (0.157–0.786) | 0.011 |
Multivariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression model. Variables were adopted for their prognostic significance according to the univariate analysis.
EJA, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; IGFBP7, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7.
Gut and Liver 2020; 14(6): 727-734
Published online November 15, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl19135
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
Can-Tong Liu1,2 , Yi-Wei Xu1,2,3
, Hong Guo4
, Chao-Qun Hong5
, Xin-Yi Huang2
, Yu-Hao Luo1
, Shi-Han Yang6
, Ling-Yu Chu2
, En- Min Li2,3,7
, Yu-Hui Peng1,2,3
1Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, 2Precision Medicine Research Center and 3Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Shantou University Medical College, Departments of 4Radiation Oncology and 5Oncological Laboratory Research, the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, 6Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Shantou Central Hospital, and 7Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
Correspondence to:Yu-Hui Penga, En-Min Lib, and Yi-Wei Xuc
aDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, No.7 Raoping Road, Shantou 515041, China
Tel: +86-137-1591-2739, Fax: +86-754-8856-0352, E-mail: pengyuhui666@163.com
bDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, No.22 Xinling Road, Shantou 515041, China
Tel: +86-138-0929-1605, Fax: +86-754-8890-0847, E-mail: nmli@stu.edu.cn
cDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, No.7 Raoping Road, Shantou 515041, China
Tel: +86-159-8970-1200, Fax: +86-754-8856-0352, E-mail: yiwei512@126.com
Background/Aims: Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EJA) is a malignant tumor associated with high morbidity and has attracted increasing attention due to a rising incidence and low survival rate. Pathological biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis, but noninvasive and effective tests are lacking, resulting in diagnoses at advanced stages. This study explored the diagnostic value of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) in EJA. Methods: A total of 120 EJA patients and 88 normal controls were recruited, and their serum levels of IGFBP7 were measured by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic value, and Pearson chi-square analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between IGFBP7 and clinical parameters. Kaplan- Meier survival analysis was carried out to assess the effect of IGFBP7 on overall survival (OS). Results: The levels of IGFBP7 were higher in both early- and late-stage EJA patients than in normal controls (p<0.001). The area under the ROC curve for EJA patients was 0.794 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.733 to 0.854), with a cutoff value of 2.716 ng/mL, a sensitivity of 63.3% (95% CI, 54.0% to 71.8%) and a specificity of 90.9% (95% CI, 82.4% to 95.7%). For the diagnosis of early-stage EJA, the same cutoff value and specificity were obtained, but the sensitivity of IGFBP7 was 54.3% (95% CI, 36.9% to 70.8%). Patients with low IGFBP7 protein expression had lower OS than those with high expression (p=0.034). The multivariate analysis showed that IGFBP7 is an independent prognostic factor for EJA (p=0.011). Conclusions: Serum IGFBP7 acts as a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker for EJA.
Keywords: Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-7, Esophagogastric junction, Adenocarcinoma, Diagnosis, Prognosis
In recent decades, the incidence of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EJA) has rapidly increased in both western countries and eastern Asia.1 EJA is usually divided into three different types according to the 1998 Siewert classification.2 Tumors with centers from 5 cm to 1 cm above the esophagogastric junction are defined as Siewert type I, while tumors with the centers located 1 cm above to 2 cm below the junction are type II, and tumors with centers located 2 cm to 5 cm below the junction are type III. However, in accordance to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging Manual,3 esophagogastric junction cancers with centers no more than 2 cm from the inferior esophageal sphincter are staged as esophageal adenocarcinoma (Siewert type I or II), while those more than 2 cm are staged as stomach cancers (Siewert type III).3 Overall survival (OS) for EJA is poor, with a 5-year survival of less than 25% in China.4,5 In clinical practice, the diagnosis of EJA is mostly dependent on pathological biopsy after endoscopy or surgery, both of which are invasive methods. A valuable and noninvasive method is urgently needed for early diagnosis.
The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) family is composed of IGFs, IGF receptors and IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs),6-8 which play a vital role in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis.9 Among them, IGFBP7 binds IGF-I and IGF-II with low affinity.10 However, IGFBP7 has been found to be related to several diseases, such as acute kidney injury11 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.12 Similarly, both high and low expression of IGFBP7 has been observed in various cancer tissues, such as gastric13 and colorectal cancer.14 In gastroesophageal cancer, IGFBP7 expression also correlates with pathophysiology and tumorigenesis.15 Here, we explored the potential of serum IGFBP7 levels as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for EJA.
In total, we collected 208 serum samples from the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College: 88 healthy control samples and 120 EJA samples. All participants were diagnosed to be without acute kidney injury or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. EJA patient serum samples used in this experiment were collected between July 2013 and November 2017 before surgery, and follow-up was made starting from the day of surgery. The exit date was defined as the day of death, withdrawal or completion of follow-up before December 2018. Both patients and normal controls signed informed consent to participate in this study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College and conformed to the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki. After venous sampling before surgery, serum was obtained by centrifuging blood at 2500
EJA was diagnosed by computed tomography or gastroscopy, followed by pathological examination after surgery, endoscopic mucosal resection or biopsy. All patients were accepted for surgery. We defined tumor stage according to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging Manual.3 In accordance with our previous study, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I+II was defined as early-stage EJA.16
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits for serum IGFBP-7 were purchased from Cusabio® (Catalog number: CSB-E17249h; Houston, TX, USA). The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay protocol was carried out according to the user manual. The serum samples were diluted to 1:3, while the standard was diluted to a concentration gradient of 10, 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, 0.312, and 0.156 ng/mL, respectively. The 100 μL serum sample, standard or sample diluent (acted as negative control) was added to each well and incubated for 2 hours at 37°C. After removed the liquid, 100 μL biotin-antibody (1X) and 100 μL horseradish peroxidase-avidin (1X) were added in chronological order. 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine substrate was used for color development and stop solution for the termination of color development. The measurement of optical density value of each well was executed on a plate microplate reader (BioTek® Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) within 5 minutes at 450 nm with 570 nm reference.
We first changed the optical density values to concentration according to the standard curve plotted by SigmaPlot 10.0. Then the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to evaluate the difference of IGFBP7 levels between two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic boundaries including the area under the ROC curve (AUC) with the 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity and specificity. The cutoff value was calculated by achieving the maximum sensitivity when the specificity was greater than 90%, and by minimizing the distance of the cutoff value to the top-left corner of the ROC curve. We selected a specificity of greater than 90% in order to produce a test that could be beneficial to early cancer detection.17 Correlation between clinical characteristics and the level of IGFBP7 was evaluated by the chi-square test. For optimal cut-point definition in prognostic analysis, we used the X-tile 3.6.1 software to category high and low expression of IGFBP7.18 The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess the effect of IGFBP7 on OS. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to judge the hazard ratio. In all analyses, a p<0.05 (two-tailed) was defined as significance. Statistical analyses were carried out with SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
A total of 208 patients and normal controls were analyzed (Table 1). The mean concentration±standard error of the mean (SEM) of IGFBP7 for EJA patients was 3.436±0.1998 ng/mL versus 1.821±0.0663 ng/mL and 3.863±0.5666 ng/mL in the normal control group and early-stage patient group, respectively (Table 2). Thus, early- and late-stage patients with EJA had a significant increase in level of serum IGFBP7, compared with normal controls (p<0.001) (Fig. 1). As illustrated in Fig. 1, similar result can be found in early-stage EJA patients.
We identified a cutoff value of 2.716 ng/mL for IGFBP7 to diagnose EJA by using the ROC curve to compare the EJA and normal control groups (Fig. 2). We acquired an AUC of 0.794 (95% CI, 0.733 to 0.854) with a sensitivity of 63.3% (95% CI, 54.0% to 71.8%) and a specificity of 90.9% (95% CI, 82.4% to 95.7%) (Table 3). Also, with the same cutoff value, IGFBP7 could identify early-stage EJA with a slightly lower AUC value of 0.749 (95% CI, 0.644 to 0.854), a sensitivity of 54.3% (95% CI, 36.9% to 70.8%) and a specificity of 90.9% (95% CI, 82.4% to 95.7%).
With the cutoff value of 2.716 ng/mL, we defined the positivity of the serum IGFBP7 levels for EJA patients to be over 2.716 ng/mL. Table 4 shows the relationship of serum IGFBP7 levels with clinicopathological features in EJA. IGFBP7 showed no association with any clinical data, including patient age, gender, smoking, drinking, size, depth of invasion, histological grade, lymph node status, metastasis, and early-stage versus advanced-stage groups (all p>0.05).
According to X-tile software, we set 3.436 ng/mL as the cutoff value to classify high and low expression of IGFBP7. The difference in 3-year OS for EJA patients with high IGFBP7 levels had 72.4% 3-year OS versus 59.7% for patients with low expression (Fig. 3A), and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.034). When we stratified according to staging, the same results were found in subgroups categorized with T4 (p=0.010), N1+N2+N3 (p=0.041), and III+IV (p=0.014) (Fig. 3B-D). Upon univariable analysis, IGFBP7 was a significant prognostic factor for 3-year OS of EJA patients (p=0.040) (Table 5). Upon multivariable analysis, IGFBP7 was an independent significant prognostic marker for 3-year OS (hazard ratio, 0.351; 95% CI, 0.157 to 0.786; p=0.011). Other significant variables included further metastasis (p<0.001) and depth of tumor invasion (p=0.012).
In our study, IGFBP7 was significantly higher in both early- and late-stage EJA compared to normal controls (p<0.001). For diagnosis, we achieved an AUC of 0.794 (95% CI, 0.733 to 0.854) and cutoff value of 2.716 ng/mL with sensitivity of 63.3% (95% CI, 54.0% to 71.8%) and specificity of 90.9% (95% CI, 82.4% to 95.7%) in EJA. Furthermore, we found that the level of serum IGFBP7 is not associated with any clinical parameters. However, if diagnosed with EJA, lower IGFBP7 expression may lead to the worse survival.
IGF family members regulate cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis through the MAPK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways.19 They have also been demonstrated to correlate with many cancers.20-22 IGFBP7, also named IGFBP-rP1, is one of the members in IGF family. Although it shares 30% structural homology with IGFBP1 to IGFBP6 at its N-terminal domain, as it binds to IGF with low affinity10,23 and its individual characteristics are different from IGFBP1 to IGFBP6. Methylation of IGFBP7 may reduce the expression of IGFBP7 in gastric cancer and prostate cancer and improve the tumor progression,13,24 and administration of IGFBP7 may be therapeutic for reducing breast cancer growth.25 However, prior studies investigated expression in mostly cells and tissues. Serum expression of IGFBP7 has only been studied in a few diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease12 and metabolic syndrome.26 Therefore, we evaluated the potential diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating IGFBP7 in EJA.
Early detection is one of the best methods to reduce cancer mortality and cancer burden.27 In clinical practice, endoscopy contributes to the early diagnosis of EJA.28 However, it is invasive and may produce adverse effects, such as infection, perforation, and bleeding.29 A recent study on serum autoantibody panels to detect EJA aroused our interest to identify noninvasive techniques to detect IGFBP7 in EJA patient serum.16 When accounting for the early detection of IGFBP7 in EJA, through ROC curve analysis, we found an AUC of 0.749 (95% CI, 0.644 to 0.854), which led to a sensitivity of 54.3% (95% CI, 36.9% to 70.8%) and specificity of 90.9% (95% CI, 82.4% to 95.7%). Although there was no statistical correlation between late-stage and early-stage EJA (p=0.187) (Table 4), IGFBP7 might be used as a potential biomarker for the early detection of EJA. Actually, there have been several studies on serum IGFBP7 in other cancers. Overexpression of serum IGFBP7 has been observed in high-grade soft tissue sarcoma,30 and high levels of serum IGFBP7 have been associated with positive nodal status in non-small cell lung cancer.31 However, both of them have not researched on the early-stage cancer. Additionally, our recent study has showed serum IGFBP7 might serve as a diagnostic biomarker for esophageal cancer,32 and it also made sense in early-stage esophageal cancer. Herein, although IGFBP7 is not a unique biomarker for EJA, it still may be a valuable candidate for EJA, in particular for the early detection of EJA.
Although Smith
In summary, our study offers useful information regarding the diagnostic value of serum IGFBP7 in EJA and suggests that IGFBP7 might be a potential biomarker for the detection and diagnosis of EJA. Additionally, low expression of IGFBP7, acting as an independent factor, might predict the poor prognosis of EJA. However, this was a single-institution study with a small sample size, which may lead to bias. A study with large sample size in multiple institutions should be performed to further verify the diagnostic value of IGFBP7 in EJA, especially early-stage EJA.
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972801 and 31600632); the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030307079); the Innovative and Strong School Project of Guangdong (2018KTSCX068) and the Grant for Key Disciplinary Project of Clinical Medicine under the Guangdong High-level University Development Program.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Experiments: C.T.L., Y.W.X., X.Y.H. Data analysis: C.T.L., L.Y.C., S.H.Y. Technical or material support: C.Q.H. Serum and clinical data collection: H.G., Y.H.L. Writing - original draft and review and editing: C.T.L., Y.W.X. Study design and obtained funding: Y.W.X., E.M.L., Y.H.P. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Table 1 Characteristics of the Study Population
Group | EJA (n=120) | Normal (n=88) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | 3-yr survival rate (%) | p-value | No. (%) | ||
Age, yr | |||||
Mean (range) | 60 (31–82) | 56 (40–80) | |||
Sex | 0.469 | ||||
Male | 99 | 76.4 | 61 (69.3) | ||
Female | 21 | 49.5 | 27 (30.7) | ||
Smoke | 0.557 | ||||
Yes | 79 | 63.6 | - | ||
No | 41 | 69.0 | - | ||
Alcohol | 0.038 | ||||
Yes | 28 | 46.0 | - | ||
No | 92 | 71.7 | - | ||
Size of tumor, cm | 0.109 | ||||
≥5 | 72 | 60.8 | - | ||
<5 | 48 | 72.9 | - | ||
Depth of tumor invasion | 0.012 | ||||
T1+T2+T3 | 36 (7+4+25) | 79.8 | - | ||
T4 | 84 | 59.5 | - | ||
Regional lymph nodes | <0.001 | ||||
N0 | 36 | 73.3 | - | ||
N1 | 31 | 80.6 | - | ||
N2 | 30 | 66.5 | - | ||
N3 | 23 | 33.5 | - | ||
Metastasis | <0.001 | ||||
M0 | 116 | 66.9 | - | ||
M1 | 4 | 25.0 | - | ||
Histological grade | 0.019 | ||||
G1 (High) | 15 | 84.0 | - | ||
G2 (Middle) | 44 | 68.0 | - | ||
G3 (Low) | 47 | 53.2 | - | ||
Unknown | 14 | - | - | ||
TNM stage | 0.055 | ||||
I+II | 35 (9+26) | 76.8 | - | ||
III+IV | 85 (74+11) | 60.7 | - |
EJA, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.
Table 2 Frequency of Circulating IGFBP7
Group | Mean±SEM | p-value | No. | Positive (%, 95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Normal controls | 1.821±0.0663 | - | 88 | 8 (9.1, 4.7–16.9) |
All EJA | 3.436±0.1998 | <0.001 | 120 | 76 (63.3, 54.4–71.4) |
Early-stage EJA | 3.863±0.5666 | <0.001 | 35 | 19 (54.3, 36.9–70.8) |
IGFBP7, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7; SEM, standard error of the mean; CI, exact confidence interval; EJA, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.
Table 3 Result of the Measurement of IGFBP7 for the Diagnosis of EJA
IGFBP7 | AUC | SEN, % | SPE, % | FPS, % | FNS, % | PPV, % | NPV, % | PLR | NLR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EJA vs NC | 0.794 | 63.3 | 90.9 | 9.5 | 35.4 | 90.5 | 64.5 | 6.97 | 0.40 |
Early-stage EJA vs NC | 0.749 | 54.3 | 90.9 | 29.6 | 16.7 | 70.4 | 83.3 | 5.97 | 0.50 |
Numbers in brackets represent the 95% confidence interval.
IGFBP7, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7; EJA, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma; NC, normal controls; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; FPS, false-positive rate; FNS, false-negative rate; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio.
Table 4 Relationship between the Positive Rate of IGFBP7 and the Clinical Data in EJA Patients
Variable | Positive | Negative | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Age, yr | 0.113 | ||
≥60 | 54 | 25 | |
<60 | 22 | 19 | |
Sex | 0.881 | ||
Male | 63 | 36 | |
Female | 13 | 8 | |
Smoke | 0.699 | ||
Yes | 51 | 28 | |
No | 25 | 16 | |
Alcohol | 0.310 | ||
Yes | 20 | 8 | |
No | 56 | 36 | |
Size of tumor, cm | 0.315 | ||
≥5 | 43 | 29 | |
<5 | 33 | 15 | |
Depth of tumor invasion | 0.620 | ||
T1+T2+T3 | 24 | 12 | |
T4 | 52 | 32 | |
Regional lymph nodes | 0.741 | ||
N0 | 22 | 14 | |
N1+N2+N3 | 54 | 30 | |
Metastasis | 1.000 | ||
M0 | 73 | 43 | |
M1 | 3 | 1 | |
Histological grade | 0.562 | ||
G1 | 9 | 6 | |
G2 | 30 | 14 | |
G3 | 27 | 20 | |
TNM grade | 0.187 | ||
Early stage (I-II) | 19 | 16 | |
Late stage (III-IV) | 57 | 28 |
Statistical significance was determined using the Pearson chi-square test. Data were from patients with tumor resection.
IGFBP7, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7; EJA, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.
Table 5 Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Factors Associated with Overall Survival in Patients with EJA
Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | p-value | HR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
Age (≥60 yr vs <60 yr) | 0.995 (0.955–1.037) | 0.819 | |||
Sex (female vs male) | 0.750 (0.343–1.640) | 0.471 | |||
Smoke (yes vs no) | 1.226 (0.620–2.426) | 0.558 | |||
Alcohol (yes vs no) | 2.007 (1.025–3.931) | 0.042 | |||
Tumor size (≥5 cm vs <5 cm) | 1.759 (0.874–3.538) | 0.113 | |||
T (T4 vs T1+T2+T3) | 3.114 (1.217–7.966) | 0.018 | 3.362 (1.310–8.625) | 0.012 | |
N (N1+N2+N3 vs N0) | 1.996 (0.917–4.346) | 0.082 | |||
M (M1 vs M0) | 7.445 (2.225–24.904) | 0.001 | 11.303 (3.101–41.202) | <0.001 | |
G (G2+G3 vs G1) | 3.734 (0.897–15.553) | 0.070 | |||
pTNM-stage (III+IV vs I+II) | 2.183 (0.963–4.949) | 0.062 | |||
IGFBP7 (≥3.436 vs <3.436) | 0.433 (0.195–0.962) | 0.040 | 0.351 (0.157–0.786) | 0.011 |
Multivariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression model. Variables were adopted for their prognostic significance according to the univariate analysis.
EJA, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; IGFBP7, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7.