Article Search
검색
검색 팝업 닫기

Metrics

Help

  • 1. Aims and Scope

    Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut atnd Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. +MORE

  • 2. Editorial Board

    Editor-in-Chief + MORE

    Editor-in-Chief
    Yong Chan Lee Professor of Medicine
    Director, Gastrointestinal Research Laboratory
    Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Univ. California San Francisco
    San Francisco, USA

    Deputy Editor

    Deputy Editor
    Jong Pil Im Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
    Robert S. Bresalier University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
    Steven H. Itzkowitz Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY, USA
  • 3. Editorial Office
  • 4. Articles
  • 5. Instructions for Authors
  • 6. File Download (PDF version)
  • 7. Ethical Standards
  • 8. Peer Review

    All papers submitted to Gut and Liver are reviewed by the editorial team before being sent out for an external peer review to rule out papers that have low priority, insufficient originality, scientific flaws, or the absence of a message of importance to the readers of the Journal. A decision about these papers will usually be made within two or three weeks.
    The remaining articles are usually sent to two reviewers. It would be very helpful if you could suggest a selection of reviewers and include their contact details. We may not always use the reviewers you recommend, but suggesting reviewers will make our reviewer database much richer; in the end, everyone will benefit. We reserve the right to return manuscripts in which no reviewers are suggested.

    The final responsibility for the decision to accept or reject lies with the editors. In many cases, papers may be rejected despite favorable reviews because of editorial policy or a lack of space. The editor retains the right to determine publication priorities, the style of the paper, and to request, if necessary, that the material submitted be shortened for publication.

Search

Search

Year

to

Article Type

Original Article

Split Viewer

Refeeding Syndrome as a Possible Cause of Very Early Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis

Tae Joo Jeon1, Kyong Joo Lee2, Hyun Sun Woo3, Eui Joo Kim3, Yeon Suk Kim3, Ji Young Park1, Jae Hee Cho3

1Department of Internal Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, 2Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, and 3Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea

Correspondence to: Jae Hee Cho
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon 21565, Korea
Tel: +82-32-460-8507, Fax: +82-32-460-2391, E-mail: jhcho9328@gmail.com

Tae Joo Jeon and Kyong Joo Lee contributed equally to this work as first authors.

Received: October 8, 2018; Revised: November 21, 2018; Accepted: December 10, 2018

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Gut Liver 2019;13(5):576-581. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl18458

Published online May 30, 2019, Published date September 15, 2019

Copyright © Gut and Liver.

Background/Aims

Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is a fatal clinical complication that can occur as a result of fluid and electrolyte shifts during early nutritional rehabilitation for malnourished patients. This study was conducted to determine the clinical implications of RFS in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP).

Methods

Between 2006 and 2016, AP patients with very early mortality were retrospectively enrolled from three university hospitals.

Results

Among 3,206 patients with AP, 44 patients died within 3 days after diagnosis. The median age was 52.5 years (range, 27 to 92 years), male-to-female ratio was 3:1, and median duration from admission to death was 33 hours (range, 5 to 72 hours). The etiology of AP was alcohol abuse in 32 patients, gallstones in five patients, and hypertriglyceridemia in two patients. Ranson score, bedside index for severity of AP, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation-II were valuable for predicting very early mortality (median, [range]; 5 [1 to 8], 3 [0 to 5], and 19 [4 to 45]). RFS was diagnosed in nine patients who died of septic shock (n=5), cardiogenic shock (n=2), or cardiac arrhythmia (n=2). In addition, patients with RFS had significant hypophosphatemia compared to non-RFS patients (2.6 mg/dL [1.3 to 5.1] vs 5.8 mg/dL [0.8 to 15.5]; p=0.001). The early AP-related mortality rate within 3 days was approximately 1.4%, and RFS occurred in 20.5% of these patients following sudden nutritional support.

Conclusions

The findings of current study emphasize that clinicians should be aware of the possibility of RFS in malnourished AP patients with electrolyte imbalances.

Keywords: Refeeding syndrome, Acute pancreatitis, Mortality, Prognosis, Nutrition

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is the most common gastrointestinal indication requiring hospitalization. Despite adequate early treatment, it can be life-threatening in one-fifth of patients, and the overall mortality in hospitalized patients with AP is estimated to be approximately 3% to 5%.13 However, the incidence and causal factors for early mortality are not fully understood, even though it is not uncommon for physicians to experience unexpected early mortality while treating pancreatitis.

Malnourished patients with any internal medical disease such as pancreatitis or an eating disorder require nutritional rehabilitation. However, a potential risk associated with nutritional therapy in undernourished patients is refeeding syndrome (RFS), where electrolyte (phosphate, magnesium, and potassium) disturbances can lead to clinical deterioration and possible sudden mortality. Estimates of the prevalence of RFS vary widely from 0.43% to 34%.4 RFS broadly encompasses clinical complications that can occur as result of fatal fluid and electrolyte shifts in malnourished patients during refeeding by oral, enteral, or parenteral5 routes and can lead to cardiac arrhythmia, muscle weakness and cramping, seizures, delirium, and death.612 Although the relationship between AP-related early mortality and RFS has not been reported, patients with severe AP, especially those with chronic alcoholism and/or malnourishment, may be at risk of developing RFS.13 Although routine use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is not recommended for early management of pancreatitis, high calorie nutrition rehabilitation is often provided to patients with AP on admission. Therefore, RFS may be responsible for unexpected and unexplained early AP related mortality.

However, the importance of RFS has been overlooked in many clinical fields, and most gastroenterologists pay little attention to the risk of RFS during initial nutritional support. Because RFS may be a possible cause of early AP-related mortality, we aimed to determine the possible causes of very early mortality (within 3 days) in patients with AP.

1. Patients and methods

This was a retrospective multicenter study involving three university hospitals: Gil Medical Center of Gachon University, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital of Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, and Sanggye Paik Hospital of Inje University. Medical records of patients admitted from January 2006 to December 2016 were reviewed and a total of 3,206 patients with suspected AP were identified (Fig. 1). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards for Human Research of Gachon Gil University (GAIRB2017-220), Wonju Severance Christian Hospital (CR315005), and Sanggye Paik Hospital (SGPAIK2018-11-017). This study was performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of each institution. No consent was required because data were anonymized before analyses.

Patients diagnosed with AP were required to satisfy two of the following three criteria: abdominal pain characteristic of AP, serum amylase and/or lipase ≥3 times the upper limit of normal, and computed tomography (CT) findings of AP.14 In this study, very early mortality was defined as death within 3 days after diagnosis of AP, because RFS can develop rapidly within 3 days after beginning nutritional rehabilitation.1518 The severity of AP was evaluated using Ranson criteria, bedside index for severity of AP (BISAP), CT severity index (CTSI), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation-II (APACHE-II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), Harmless AP, and simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II.

2. Definitions of refeeding syndrome

Although there is no universal agreement on the definition of RFS, it has been defined as severe fluid and electrolyte shifts in malnourished patients during oral, enteral, or parenteral refeeding. If one of the following criteria was met: body mass index <16 kg/m2, unintentional weight loss >15% in the preceding 3 to 6 months, very little or no nutritional intake for more than 10 days, or low levels of serum potassium phosphate or magnesium prior to feeding, the patient was determined to be at risk of RFS.19 The patient was also considered at risk of RFS if two of the following criteria were met: body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, unintentional weight loss >10% in the preceding 3 to 6 months, minimal or no significant nutritional intake for >5 days, and/or medical history of alcohol or drug abuse.19 RFS was confirmed using the three diagnostic criteria of severely low-serum electrolyte levels of phosphate, magnesium, or potassium; fluid balance abnormalities such as cardiac failure, pleural effusion, hypotension and acute kidney injury; and organ dysfunction.20,21

3. Statistical analyses

Standard descriptive statistics were used to evaluate data from the participants. The Mann-Whitney test and Fisher exact test were used to compare data between patients with RFS and without RFS. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

1. Characteristics of AP patients with very early mortality

In this study, 44 (1.4%) of 3,206 patients with AP died within 3 days after diagnosis. Their median age was 52.5 years (range, 27 to 92 years), and very early mortality affected more male than female patients. The most common etiology of AP was alcohol abuse, while other causes were gallstones, malignancy, hypertriglyceridemia, pancreas divisum, and idiopathic. In terms of immediate cause of death, septic shock was the most common cause of very early mortality in AP, followed by cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrhythmia, alcoholic ketoacidosis, and respiratory failure. Median duration of admission to death was 33 hours (range, 5 to 72 hours). Among various scoring systems, Ranson score, BISAP, and APACHE-II were confirmed to be valuable at predicting very early mortality in AP patients (median [range]; 5 [1 to 8], 3 [0 to 5], 19 [4 to 45]); however, CTSI was not helpful for predicting very early mortality in AP patients (median, 2; range, 0 to 10) (Table 1).

2. Characteristics of AP patients with RFS

Of 44 AP patients with very early mortality, nine (20.5%) were diagnosed with RFS because of a positive history of alcohol abuse, inadequate nutritional intake for more than 5 days, or low serum levels of phosphate (n=5), magnesium (n=1), and potassium (n=2) before initial nutritional rehabilitation. Also, all patients expired suddenly after rapid parenteral nutritional support, and most showed electrolyte imbalance and/or abnormal fluid distribution such as pleural effusion (n=6). Immediate causes of death in RFS were septic shock (n=5, 55.6%), cardiogenic shock (n=2, 22.2%), and cardiac arrhythmia (n=2, 22.2%), which coincided with nutritional support of total parental nutrition of more than 10 kcal/kg/day. This nutritional rehabilitation aggravated the clinical manifestations of the nine patients and was likely the immediate cause of death within 3 days (Table 2).

The nine RFS AP patients were compared with the 35 non-RFS AP patients with very early mortality. Only phosphate level was significantly different between the two groups (2.6 mg/dL vs 5.8 mg/dL, p=0.001). There were no significant differences in age, sex, duration from admission to death, etiology of AP, immediate cause of death, severity of AP, BMI, or levels of hematocrit, potassium, sodium, and albumin between the two groups (Table 3).

This study reviewed the medical records of 44 patients with AP with very early mortality (death within 3 days after diagnosis of AP). The history of alcohol abuse and malnutrition in these patients supports the hypothesis that RFS is associated with early AP-related mortality as 20% of these patients had RFS. Considering the fatal consequences of RFS, early detection and prevention are critical, particular in patients at high risk for RFS, namely elderly patients as well as those with cancer, chronic alcoholism, anorexia nervosa, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, or malabsorption syndromes such as inflammatory bowel disease or chronic pancreatitis.4,21,22

It is important to gain an understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms involved in refeeding to examine how this may result in early mortality in patients with AP. Introduction of energy can cause RFS because of the change from the catabolic state of starvation to anabolic metabolism during nutritional rehabilitation. Initial nutrition support with TPN can elicit congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema because of hyperinsulinemia and decreased renal excretion of sodium and water.21,22 A physiological shift from fat to carbohydrate metabolism will result in electrolyte imbalance, which is responsible for cellular uptake of phosphate, magnesium, and potassium ions. Phosphate is the major intracellular divalent anion and is an important intracellular buffer as well as a major structural component of nucleic acids, nucleoproteins, and phospholipids. It plays an important role in maintenance of the structural integrity of the cell membrane, activation of many enzymes and second messengers, and energy storage in the form of adenosine triphosphate.21 Severe hypophosphatemia is an early warning sign of RFS, and serum phosphate level should be closely monitored in patients at high risk of RFS.23 However, other electrolyte imbalances such as hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia can also develop.2427

Some patients with AP also have typical characteristics of alcohol abuse and little or no nutritional intake for more than 5 days, which are both risk factors for RFS according to criteria established by the guidelines of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).19 However, most gastroenterologists have paid little attention to RFS. Starvation for a period as short as 48 hours and poor nutrition status can predispose a person to RFS.28 In our study, the nine patients with RFS had little or no nutritional intake for more than 5 days. Among them, eight patients were chronic alcoholics. Hypophosphatemia is known as a major feature of RFS after reintroduction of nutrition. In our study, five of the nine RFS patients had hypophosphatemia before TPN and the other three patients developed hypophosphatemia after administration of TPN. Unfortunately, one patient did not have a follow-up phosphate level measurement due to sudden death, but hypokalemia was observed in this patient. Potassium is also depleted in undernutrition, but serum concentrations remain normal.21 In our study, hyperkalemia or an increase in potassium levels were seen in five patients. Dehydration and acute kidney injury may have induced these phenomena. In addition, six AP patients with RFS developed fluid overload such as pleural effusion. Thus, electrolyte imbalance and abnormal fluid distribution might have contributed to the early deaths of nine patients with RFS because their conditions were definitely aggravated after nutritional rehabilitation.

Therefore, in patients with severe AP, especially chronic alcoholics, serum electrolytes such as sodium, potassium, magnesium and phosphorus should be checked before starting nutritional support.29 High calorie nutrition rehabilitation using TPN or enteral feeding should not be started in patients with severe fluid and electrolytes imbalances. For patients at high risk of RFS, energy replacement should be started slowly at a maximum rate of 10 kcal/kg/day and be increased over 4 to 7 days.5,21 Complete normalization of electrolytes before feeding is not necessary, but correction should be started from the beginning and maintained alongside feeding.29

There are several limitations that warrant careful interpretation of our findings. First, this was a retrospective small population study. Second, many patients with AP died due to sudden death before their phosphate level was rechecked. Therefore, it is likely that the incidence of hypophosphatemia after refeeding was underestimated. Third, we only included patients with early AP-related mortalities within 3 days. Patients with all AP-related mortality should be included in future studies to determine if there is a causal relationship between RFS and early mortality in AP patients. Finally, although there is some consensus regarding risk factors and timely occurrence of RFS, the definition of RFS is heterogeneous. Therefore, further prospective well-designed studies using an established definition of RFS are warranted to evaluate the association between RFS and prognosis of AP.

In conclusion, clinicians should consider AP patients to be at risk of RFS when these patients present with little or no nutritional intake for more than 5 days, a history of alcohol abuse, old age, or a low level of phosphate before refeeding. When treating such patients, energy replacement should be started at no more than 10 kcal/kg/day and slowly increased over 4 to 7 days. It is also necessary to supplement thiamine, vitamin B, potassium, phosphate, calcium, and magnesium levels.21 Careful monitoring and multidiscipline nutritional team management may help to reduce the morbidity and mortality of RFS in patients with AP.

Study concept and design: J.H.C. Data acquisition: H.S.W., E.J.K., Y.S.K., J.Y.P. Data analysis and interpretation: T.J.J., K.J.L. Drafting of the manuscript; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: T.J.J., K.J.L., J.H.C. Statistical analysis: J.H.C. Administrative, technical, or material support; study supervision: J.H.C.

Fig. 1.The study design evaluating early mortality of patients with acute pancreatitis and refeeding syndrome.

Clinical Features of Patients with Acute Pancreatitis Related to Very Early Mortality (within 3 Days of Diagnosis)*

Clinical characteristicValue (n=44)
Age, yr52.5 (27–92)
Sex, female:male1:3
BMI, kg/m223.4 (17.6–28.4)
Etiology
 Alcohol abuse32 (72.7)
 Gallstones5 (11.4)
 Hypertriglyceridemia2 (4.5)
 Malignancy1 (2.3)
 Pancreas divisum1 (2.3)
 Idiopathic origin3 (6.8)
Immediate cause of death
 Septic shock24 (54.5)
 Cardiogenic shock9 (20.5)
 Cardiac arrhythmia5 (11.4)
 Alcoholic ketoacidosis4 (9.1)
 Respiratory failure2 (4.5)
Duration from admission to death, hr33 (5–72)
Scoring systems and laboratory findings
 Ranson score5 (1–8)
 BISAP3 (0–5)
 CT severity index2 (0–10)
 APACHE-II19 (4–45)
 SOFA7 (0–16)
 Harmless AP1 (0–3)
 SAPS II45 (23–93)
Hematocrit, %40.85 (27.8–54.3)
Phosphate, mg/dL5.0 (0.8–15.5)
Potassium, mEq/L4.2 (2.6–6.6)
Sodium, mEq/L131.5 (109.0–149.0)
Albumin, g/dL3.5 (1.7–5.0)

Data are presented as median (range) or number (%).

BMI, body mass index; BISAP, bedside index for severity of acute pancreatitis; CT, computed tomography; APACHE-II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation-II; SOFA, sequential organic failure assessment; AP, acute pancreatitis; SAPS II, simplified acute physiology score II.

*Reference range (serum), conventional units; hematocrit, males 42% to 52%, females 37% to 47%; phosphate, 2.7–4.5 mg/dL; potassium, 3.5–5.1 mEq/L; sodium, 136–145 mEq/L; albumin, 3.5–5.2 g/dL.


Detailed Clinical Characteristics Related to Early Mortality in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis with Refeeding Syndrome*

CaseAge, yrSexAlcohol abuseBMI, kg/m2Nutritional support on the 1st day, kcal/dayPhosphate, mg/dLMagnesium, mg/dLPotassium, mEq/LCreatinine, mg/dLAlbumin, g/dLPleural effusionCauses of deathDuration from admission to death, hrDiagnostic criteria of RFS
147M+19.21,2002.53.90.43.8Septic shock111,2,3
241M+24.91,4001.8 → 1.31.9 → 1.86.5 → 6.53.03.5 → 3.0+Septic shock201,2,3
352M+28.41,0001.54.5 → 5.00.73.6 → 3.3+Cardiac arrhythmia361,2,3
427M+20.01,0002.93.40.73.5+Cardiac arrhythmia481,2,3
546M+24.91,2005.0 → 3.24.5 → 4.93.53.0 → 1.9+Cardiogenic shock721,2,3
647M+22.61,4005.1 → 0.91.4 → 1.64.9 → 3.23.133.3 → 2.2+Septic shock701,2,3
780M+23.42,3003.8 → 2.52.1 → 2.23.6 → 4.50.884.2 → 2.1Septic shock251,2,3
839M+25.72,2001.3 → 1.32.3 → 2.33.4 → 6.91.25.0Cardiogenic shock411,2,3
989F20.51,2002.61.74.2 → 4.10.93.1+Septic shock611,2,3

BMI, body mass index; RFS, refeeding syndrome; M, male; F, female.

*Reference range (serum), conventional units; hematocrit, males 42% to 52%, females 37% to 47%; phosphate, 2.7–4.5 mg/dL; magnesium, 1.6–2.6 mg/dL; potassium, 3.5–5.1 mEq/L; creatinine, male 0.7–1.3 mg/dL, female 0.6–1.1 mg/dL; albumin, 3.5–5.2 g/dL;

Admission → follow-up;

Diagnostic criteria for RFS; (1) electrolyte derangements (hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia), (2) fluid balance abnormalities (cardiac failure, pleural effusion, hypotension, acute kidney injury), and (3) organ failure.


Comparison of Clinical Characteristics Related to Very Early Mortality in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis with or without Refeeding Syndrome*

Clinical characteristicWith RFS (n=9)Without RFS (n=35)p-value
Age, yr47 (27–89)60 (28–92)0.125
Sex, female:male1:810:250.286
BMI, kg/m223.4 (19.3–28.4)23.4 (17.6–28.4)0.756
Etiology0.697
 Alcohol abuse8 (88.9)24 (68.6)
 Gallstones05 (14.3)
 Others1 (11.1)6 (17.4)
Immediate cause of death0.956
 Septic shock5 (55.6)19 (54.3)
 Cardiogenic shock2 (22.2)7 (20.0)
 Cardiac arrhythmia2 (22.2)3 (8.6)
 Alcoholic ketoacidosis04 (11.4)
 Respiratory failure02 (5.7)
Duration of admission to death, hr48 (11–72)31 (5–2)0.148
Scoring systems and laboratory findings
 Ranson score6 (5–8)5 (1–7)0.120
 BISAP2.5 (0–4)3 (1–5)0.475
 CT severity index3 (0–8)2 (0–10)0.626
 APACHE-II19 (4–45)19.5 (10–45)0.506
 SOFA7 (3–12)7.5 (0–16)0.576
 Harmless AP1 (1–3)1 (0–3)0.479
 SAPS II34 (33–35)50 (23–93)0.286
Hematocrit, %40.7 (29.6–49.2)41.3 (27.8–54.3)0.731
Phosphate, mg/dL2.6 (1.3–5.1)5.8 (0.8–15.5)0.001
Potassium, mEq/L4.2 (3.4–6.5)4.3 (2.6–6.6)0.607
Sodium, mEq/L138 (109–142)131 (111–149)0.864
Albumin, g/dL3.5 (3.0–5.0)3.5 (1.7–5.0)0.864

Data are presented as median (range) or number (%).

RFS, refeeding syndrome; BMI, body mass index; BISAP, bedside index for severity of acute pancreatitis; CT, computed tomography; APACHE-II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation-II; SOFA, sequential organic failure assessment; AP, acute pancreatitis; SAPS II, simplified acute physiology score II.

*Reference ranges (serum), conventional units; hematocrit, male 42% to 52%, female 37% to 47%; phosphate, 2.7–4.5 mg/dL; potassium, 3.5–5.1 mEq/L; sodium, 136–145 mEq/L; albumin, 3.5–5.2 g/dL.


  1. Lee KJ, Kim HM, Choi JS, Kim YJ, Kim YS, Cho JH. Comparison of predictive systems in severe acute pancreatitis according to the revised Atlanta classification. Pancreas 2016;45:46-50.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Cho JH, Choi JS, Hwang ET, et al. Usefulness of scheduled follow-up CT in discharged patients with acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2015;15:642-646.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Valverde-López F, Matas-Cobos AM, Alegría-Motte C, Jiménez-Rosales R, Úbeda-Muñoz M, Redondo-Cerezo E. BISAP, RANSON, lactate and others biomarkers in prediction of severe acute pancreatitis in a European cohort. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;32:1649-1656.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Crook MA, Hally V, Panteli JV. The importance of the refeeding syndrome. Nutrition 2001;17:632-637.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Mehanna H, Nankivell PC, Moledina J, Travis J. Refeeding syndrome: awareness, prevention and management. Head Neck Oncol 2009;1:4.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Dunn RL, Stettler N, Mascarenhas MR. Refeeding syndrome in hospitalized pediatric patients. Nutr Clin Pract 2003;18:327-332.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Fuentebella J, Kerner JA. Refeeding syndrome. Pediatr Clin North Am 2009;56:1201-1210.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Solomon SM, Kirby DF. The refeeding syndrome: a review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1990;14:90-97.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Katzman DK. Refeeding hospitalized adolescents with anorexia nervosa: is “start low, advance slow” urban legend or evidence based?. J Adolesc Health 2012;50:1-2.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Fernández López MT, López Otero MJ, Alvarez Vázquez P, Arias Delgado J, Varela Correa JJ. Refeeding syndrome. Farm Hosp 2009;33:183-193.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Kraft MD, Btaiche IF, Sacks GS. Review of the refeeding syndrome. Nutr Clin Pract 2005;20:625-633.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Khan LU, Ahmed J, Khan S, Macfie J. Refeeding syndrome: a literature review. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2011;2011 410971.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Gianotti L, Meier R, Lobo DN, et al. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: pancreas. Clin Nutr 2009;28:428-435.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Banks PA, Freeman ML; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2379-2400.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Gentile MG, Pastorelli P, Ciceri R, Manna GM, Collimedaglia S. Specialized refeeding treatment for anorexia nervosa patients suffering from extreme undernutrition. Clin Nutr 2010;29:627-632.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Webb GJ, Smith K, Thursby-Pelham F, Smith T, Stroud MA, Da Silva AN. Complications of emergency refeeding in anorexia nervosa: case series and review. Acute Med 2011;10:69-76.
    Pubmed
  17. Sachs K, Andersen D, Sommer J, Winkelman A, Mehler PS. Avoiding medical complications during the refeeding of patients with anorexia nervosa. Eat Disord 2015;23:411-421.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Friedli N, Stanga Z, Sobotka L, et al. Revisiting the refeeding syndrome: results of a systematic review. Nutrition 2017;35:151-160.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Nutrition support in adults: oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition (CG32). c2006. London: NICE. [cited 2019 Mar 19].
    Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg32
  20. Rio A, Whelan K, Goff L, Reidlinger DP, Smeeton N. Occurrence of refeeding syndrome in adults started on artificial nutrition support: prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002173.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Mehanna HM, Moledina J, Travis J. Refeeding syndrome: what it is, and how to prevent and treat it. BMJ 2008;336:1495-1498.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Veverbrants E, Arky RA. Effects of fasting and refeeding. I. Studies on sodium, potassium and water excretion on a constant electrolyte and fluid intake. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1969;29:55-62.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Preiser JC, van Zanten AR, Berger MM, et al. Metabolic and nutritional support of critically ill patients: consensus and controversies. Crit Care 2015;19:35.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Silvis SE, Paragas PD Jr. Paresthesias, weakness, seizures, and hypophosphatemia in patients receiving hyperalimentation. Gastroenterology 1972;62:513-520.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Hernández-Aranda JC, Gallo-Chico B, Luna-Cruz ML, et al. Malnutrition and total parenteral nutrition: a cohort study to determine the incidence of refeeding syndrome. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 1997;62:260-265.
    Pubmed
  26. Hayek ME, Eisenberg PG. Severe hypophosphatemia following the institution of enteral feedings. Arch Surg 1989;124:1325-1328.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Hearing SD. Refeeding syndrome. BMJ 2004;328:908-909.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Marik PE, Bedigian MK. Refeeding hypophosphatemia in critically ill patients in an intensive care unit: a prospective study. Arch Surg 1996;131:1043-1047.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Nunes G, Brito M, Santos CA, Fonseca J. Refeeding syndrome in the gastroenterology practice: how concerned should we be?. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;30:1270-1276.
    Pubmed CrossRef

Article

Original Article

Gut and Liver 2019; 13(5): 576-581

Published online September 15, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl18458

Copyright © Gut and Liver.

Refeeding Syndrome as a Possible Cause of Very Early Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis

Tae Joo Jeon1, Kyong Joo Lee2, Hyun Sun Woo3, Eui Joo Kim3, Yeon Suk Kim3, Ji Young Park1, Jae Hee Cho3

1Department of Internal Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, 2Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, and 3Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea

Correspondence to:Jae Hee Cho
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon 21565, Korea
Tel: +82-32-460-8507, Fax: +82-32-460-2391, E-mail: jhcho9328@gmail.com

Tae Joo Jeon and Kyong Joo Lee contributed equally to this work as first authors.

Received: October 8, 2018; Revised: November 21, 2018; Accepted: December 10, 2018

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background/Aims

Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is a fatal clinical complication that can occur as a result of fluid and electrolyte shifts during early nutritional rehabilitation for malnourished patients. This study was conducted to determine the clinical implications of RFS in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP).

Methods

Between 2006 and 2016, AP patients with very early mortality were retrospectively enrolled from three university hospitals.

Results

Among 3,206 patients with AP, 44 patients died within 3 days after diagnosis. The median age was 52.5 years (range, 27 to 92 years), male-to-female ratio was 3:1, and median duration from admission to death was 33 hours (range, 5 to 72 hours). The etiology of AP was alcohol abuse in 32 patients, gallstones in five patients, and hypertriglyceridemia in two patients. Ranson score, bedside index for severity of AP, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation-II were valuable for predicting very early mortality (median, [range]; 5 [1 to 8], 3 [0 to 5], and 19 [4 to 45]). RFS was diagnosed in nine patients who died of septic shock (n=5), cardiogenic shock (n=2), or cardiac arrhythmia (n=2). In addition, patients with RFS had significant hypophosphatemia compared to non-RFS patients (2.6 mg/dL [1.3 to 5.1] vs 5.8 mg/dL [0.8 to 15.5]; p=0.001). The early AP-related mortality rate within 3 days was approximately 1.4%, and RFS occurred in 20.5% of these patients following sudden nutritional support.

Conclusions

The findings of current study emphasize that clinicians should be aware of the possibility of RFS in malnourished AP patients with electrolyte imbalances.

Keywords: Refeeding syndrome, Acute pancreatitis, Mortality, Prognosis, Nutrition

INTRODUCTION

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is the most common gastrointestinal indication requiring hospitalization. Despite adequate early treatment, it can be life-threatening in one-fifth of patients, and the overall mortality in hospitalized patients with AP is estimated to be approximately 3% to 5%.13 However, the incidence and causal factors for early mortality are not fully understood, even though it is not uncommon for physicians to experience unexpected early mortality while treating pancreatitis.

Malnourished patients with any internal medical disease such as pancreatitis or an eating disorder require nutritional rehabilitation. However, a potential risk associated with nutritional therapy in undernourished patients is refeeding syndrome (RFS), where electrolyte (phosphate, magnesium, and potassium) disturbances can lead to clinical deterioration and possible sudden mortality. Estimates of the prevalence of RFS vary widely from 0.43% to 34%.4 RFS broadly encompasses clinical complications that can occur as result of fatal fluid and electrolyte shifts in malnourished patients during refeeding by oral, enteral, or parenteral5 routes and can lead to cardiac arrhythmia, muscle weakness and cramping, seizures, delirium, and death.612 Although the relationship between AP-related early mortality and RFS has not been reported, patients with severe AP, especially those with chronic alcoholism and/or malnourishment, may be at risk of developing RFS.13 Although routine use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is not recommended for early management of pancreatitis, high calorie nutrition rehabilitation is often provided to patients with AP on admission. Therefore, RFS may be responsible for unexpected and unexplained early AP related mortality.

However, the importance of RFS has been overlooked in many clinical fields, and most gastroenterologists pay little attention to the risk of RFS during initial nutritional support. Because RFS may be a possible cause of early AP-related mortality, we aimed to determine the possible causes of very early mortality (within 3 days) in patients with AP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Patients and methods

This was a retrospective multicenter study involving three university hospitals: Gil Medical Center of Gachon University, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital of Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, and Sanggye Paik Hospital of Inje University. Medical records of patients admitted from January 2006 to December 2016 were reviewed and a total of 3,206 patients with suspected AP were identified (Fig. 1). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards for Human Research of Gachon Gil University (GAIRB2017-220), Wonju Severance Christian Hospital (CR315005), and Sanggye Paik Hospital (SGPAIK2018-11-017). This study was performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of each institution. No consent was required because data were anonymized before analyses.

Patients diagnosed with AP were required to satisfy two of the following three criteria: abdominal pain characteristic of AP, serum amylase and/or lipase ≥3 times the upper limit of normal, and computed tomography (CT) findings of AP.14 In this study, very early mortality was defined as death within 3 days after diagnosis of AP, because RFS can develop rapidly within 3 days after beginning nutritional rehabilitation.1518 The severity of AP was evaluated using Ranson criteria, bedside index for severity of AP (BISAP), CT severity index (CTSI), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation-II (APACHE-II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), Harmless AP, and simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II.

2. Definitions of refeeding syndrome

Although there is no universal agreement on the definition of RFS, it has been defined as severe fluid and electrolyte shifts in malnourished patients during oral, enteral, or parenteral refeeding. If one of the following criteria was met: body mass index <16 kg/m2, unintentional weight loss >15% in the preceding 3 to 6 months, very little or no nutritional intake for more than 10 days, or low levels of serum potassium phosphate or magnesium prior to feeding, the patient was determined to be at risk of RFS.19 The patient was also considered at risk of RFS if two of the following criteria were met: body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, unintentional weight loss >10% in the preceding 3 to 6 months, minimal or no significant nutritional intake for >5 days, and/or medical history of alcohol or drug abuse.19 RFS was confirmed using the three diagnostic criteria of severely low-serum electrolyte levels of phosphate, magnesium, or potassium; fluid balance abnormalities such as cardiac failure, pleural effusion, hypotension and acute kidney injury; and organ dysfunction.20,21

3. Statistical analyses

Standard descriptive statistics were used to evaluate data from the participants. The Mann-Whitney test and Fisher exact test were used to compare data between patients with RFS and without RFS. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

1. Characteristics of AP patients with very early mortality

In this study, 44 (1.4%) of 3,206 patients with AP died within 3 days after diagnosis. Their median age was 52.5 years (range, 27 to 92 years), and very early mortality affected more male than female patients. The most common etiology of AP was alcohol abuse, while other causes were gallstones, malignancy, hypertriglyceridemia, pancreas divisum, and idiopathic. In terms of immediate cause of death, septic shock was the most common cause of very early mortality in AP, followed by cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrhythmia, alcoholic ketoacidosis, and respiratory failure. Median duration of admission to death was 33 hours (range, 5 to 72 hours). Among various scoring systems, Ranson score, BISAP, and APACHE-II were confirmed to be valuable at predicting very early mortality in AP patients (median [range]; 5 [1 to 8], 3 [0 to 5], 19 [4 to 45]); however, CTSI was not helpful for predicting very early mortality in AP patients (median, 2; range, 0 to 10) (Table 1).

2. Characteristics of AP patients with RFS

Of 44 AP patients with very early mortality, nine (20.5%) were diagnosed with RFS because of a positive history of alcohol abuse, inadequate nutritional intake for more than 5 days, or low serum levels of phosphate (n=5), magnesium (n=1), and potassium (n=2) before initial nutritional rehabilitation. Also, all patients expired suddenly after rapid parenteral nutritional support, and most showed electrolyte imbalance and/or abnormal fluid distribution such as pleural effusion (n=6). Immediate causes of death in RFS were septic shock (n=5, 55.6%), cardiogenic shock (n=2, 22.2%), and cardiac arrhythmia (n=2, 22.2%), which coincided with nutritional support of total parental nutrition of more than 10 kcal/kg/day. This nutritional rehabilitation aggravated the clinical manifestations of the nine patients and was likely the immediate cause of death within 3 days (Table 2).

The nine RFS AP patients were compared with the 35 non-RFS AP patients with very early mortality. Only phosphate level was significantly different between the two groups (2.6 mg/dL vs 5.8 mg/dL, p=0.001). There were no significant differences in age, sex, duration from admission to death, etiology of AP, immediate cause of death, severity of AP, BMI, or levels of hematocrit, potassium, sodium, and albumin between the two groups (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

This study reviewed the medical records of 44 patients with AP with very early mortality (death within 3 days after diagnosis of AP). The history of alcohol abuse and malnutrition in these patients supports the hypothesis that RFS is associated with early AP-related mortality as 20% of these patients had RFS. Considering the fatal consequences of RFS, early detection and prevention are critical, particular in patients at high risk for RFS, namely elderly patients as well as those with cancer, chronic alcoholism, anorexia nervosa, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, or malabsorption syndromes such as inflammatory bowel disease or chronic pancreatitis.4,21,22

It is important to gain an understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms involved in refeeding to examine how this may result in early mortality in patients with AP. Introduction of energy can cause RFS because of the change from the catabolic state of starvation to anabolic metabolism during nutritional rehabilitation. Initial nutrition support with TPN can elicit congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema because of hyperinsulinemia and decreased renal excretion of sodium and water.21,22 A physiological shift from fat to carbohydrate metabolism will result in electrolyte imbalance, which is responsible for cellular uptake of phosphate, magnesium, and potassium ions. Phosphate is the major intracellular divalent anion and is an important intracellular buffer as well as a major structural component of nucleic acids, nucleoproteins, and phospholipids. It plays an important role in maintenance of the structural integrity of the cell membrane, activation of many enzymes and second messengers, and energy storage in the form of adenosine triphosphate.21 Severe hypophosphatemia is an early warning sign of RFS, and serum phosphate level should be closely monitored in patients at high risk of RFS.23 However, other electrolyte imbalances such as hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia can also develop.2427

Some patients with AP also have typical characteristics of alcohol abuse and little or no nutritional intake for more than 5 days, which are both risk factors for RFS according to criteria established by the guidelines of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).19 However, most gastroenterologists have paid little attention to RFS. Starvation for a period as short as 48 hours and poor nutrition status can predispose a person to RFS.28 In our study, the nine patients with RFS had little or no nutritional intake for more than 5 days. Among them, eight patients were chronic alcoholics. Hypophosphatemia is known as a major feature of RFS after reintroduction of nutrition. In our study, five of the nine RFS patients had hypophosphatemia before TPN and the other three patients developed hypophosphatemia after administration of TPN. Unfortunately, one patient did not have a follow-up phosphate level measurement due to sudden death, but hypokalemia was observed in this patient. Potassium is also depleted in undernutrition, but serum concentrations remain normal.21 In our study, hyperkalemia or an increase in potassium levels were seen in five patients. Dehydration and acute kidney injury may have induced these phenomena. In addition, six AP patients with RFS developed fluid overload such as pleural effusion. Thus, electrolyte imbalance and abnormal fluid distribution might have contributed to the early deaths of nine patients with RFS because their conditions were definitely aggravated after nutritional rehabilitation.

Therefore, in patients with severe AP, especially chronic alcoholics, serum electrolytes such as sodium, potassium, magnesium and phosphorus should be checked before starting nutritional support.29 High calorie nutrition rehabilitation using TPN or enteral feeding should not be started in patients with severe fluid and electrolytes imbalances. For patients at high risk of RFS, energy replacement should be started slowly at a maximum rate of 10 kcal/kg/day and be increased over 4 to 7 days.5,21 Complete normalization of electrolytes before feeding is not necessary, but correction should be started from the beginning and maintained alongside feeding.29

There are several limitations that warrant careful interpretation of our findings. First, this was a retrospective small population study. Second, many patients with AP died due to sudden death before their phosphate level was rechecked. Therefore, it is likely that the incidence of hypophosphatemia after refeeding was underestimated. Third, we only included patients with early AP-related mortalities within 3 days. Patients with all AP-related mortality should be included in future studies to determine if there is a causal relationship between RFS and early mortality in AP patients. Finally, although there is some consensus regarding risk factors and timely occurrence of RFS, the definition of RFS is heterogeneous. Therefore, further prospective well-designed studies using an established definition of RFS are warranted to evaluate the association between RFS and prognosis of AP.

In conclusion, clinicians should consider AP patients to be at risk of RFS when these patients present with little or no nutritional intake for more than 5 days, a history of alcohol abuse, old age, or a low level of phosphate before refeeding. When treating such patients, energy replacement should be started at no more than 10 kcal/kg/day and slowly increased over 4 to 7 days. It is also necessary to supplement thiamine, vitamin B, potassium, phosphate, calcium, and magnesium levels.21 Careful monitoring and multidiscipline nutritional team management may help to reduce the morbidity and mortality of RFS in patients with AP.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Study concept and design: J.H.C. Data acquisition: H.S.W., E.J.K., Y.S.K., J.Y.P. Data analysis and interpretation: T.J.J., K.J.L. Drafting of the manuscript; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: T.J.J., K.J.L., J.H.C. Statistical analysis: J.H.C. Administrative, technical, or material support; study supervision: J.H.C.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.The study design evaluating early mortality of patients with acute pancreatitis and refeeding syndrome.
Gut and Liver 2019; 13: 576-581https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl18458

Table 1 Clinical Features of Patients with Acute Pancreatitis Related to Very Early Mortality (within 3 Days of Diagnosis)*

Clinical characteristicValue (n=44)
Age, yr52.5 (27–92)
Sex, female:male1:3
BMI, kg/m223.4 (17.6–28.4)
Etiology
 Alcohol abuse32 (72.7)
 Gallstones5 (11.4)
 Hypertriglyceridemia2 (4.5)
 Malignancy1 (2.3)
 Pancreas divisum1 (2.3)
 Idiopathic origin3 (6.8)
Immediate cause of death
 Septic shock24 (54.5)
 Cardiogenic shock9 (20.5)
 Cardiac arrhythmia5 (11.4)
 Alcoholic ketoacidosis4 (9.1)
 Respiratory failure2 (4.5)
Duration from admission to death, hr33 (5–72)
Scoring systems and laboratory findings
 Ranson score5 (1–8)
 BISAP3 (0–5)
 CT severity index2 (0–10)
 APACHE-II19 (4–45)
 SOFA7 (0–16)
 Harmless AP1 (0–3)
 SAPS II45 (23–93)
Hematocrit, %40.85 (27.8–54.3)
Phosphate, mg/dL5.0 (0.8–15.5)
Potassium, mEq/L4.2 (2.6–6.6)
Sodium, mEq/L131.5 (109.0–149.0)
Albumin, g/dL3.5 (1.7–5.0)

Data are presented as median (range) or number (%).

BMI, body mass index; BISAP, bedside index for severity of acute pancreatitis; CT, computed tomography; APACHE-II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation-II; SOFA, sequential organic failure assessment; AP, acute pancreatitis; SAPS II, simplified acute physiology score II.

*Reference range (serum), conventional units; hematocrit, males 42% to 52%, females 37% to 47%; phosphate, 2.7–4.5 mg/dL; potassium, 3.5–5.1 mEq/L; sodium, 136–145 mEq/L; albumin, 3.5–5.2 g/dL.


Table 2 Detailed Clinical Characteristics Related to Early Mortality in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis with Refeeding Syndrome*

CaseAge, yrSexAlcohol abuseBMI, kg/m2Nutritional support on the 1st day, kcal/dayPhosphate, mg/dLMagnesium, mg/dLPotassium, mEq/LCreatinine, mg/dLAlbumin, g/dLPleural effusionCauses of deathDuration from admission to death, hrDiagnostic criteria of RFS
147M+19.21,2002.53.90.43.8Septic shock111,2,3
241M+24.91,4001.8 → 1.31.9 → 1.86.5 → 6.53.03.5 → 3.0+Septic shock201,2,3
352M+28.41,0001.54.5 → 5.00.73.6 → 3.3+Cardiac arrhythmia361,2,3
427M+20.01,0002.93.40.73.5+Cardiac arrhythmia481,2,3
546M+24.91,2005.0 → 3.24.5 → 4.93.53.0 → 1.9+Cardiogenic shock721,2,3
647M+22.61,4005.1 → 0.91.4 → 1.64.9 → 3.23.133.3 → 2.2+Septic shock701,2,3
780M+23.42,3003.8 → 2.52.1 → 2.23.6 → 4.50.884.2 → 2.1Septic shock251,2,3
839M+25.72,2001.3 → 1.32.3 → 2.33.4 → 6.91.25.0Cardiogenic shock411,2,3
989F20.51,2002.61.74.2 → 4.10.93.1+Septic shock611,2,3

BMI, body mass index; RFS, refeeding syndrome; M, male; F, female.

*Reference range (serum), conventional units; hematocrit, males 42% to 52%, females 37% to 47%; phosphate, 2.7–4.5 mg/dL; magnesium, 1.6–2.6 mg/dL; potassium, 3.5–5.1 mEq/L; creatinine, male 0.7–1.3 mg/dL, female 0.6–1.1 mg/dL; albumin, 3.5–5.2 g/dL;

Admission → follow-up;

Diagnostic criteria for RFS; (1) electrolyte derangements (hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia), (2) fluid balance abnormalities (cardiac failure, pleural effusion, hypotension, acute kidney injury), and (3) organ failure.


Table 3 Comparison of Clinical Characteristics Related to Very Early Mortality in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis with or without Refeeding Syndrome*

Clinical characteristicWith RFS (n=9)Without RFS (n=35)p-value
Age, yr47 (27–89)60 (28–92)0.125
Sex, female:male1:810:250.286
BMI, kg/m223.4 (19.3–28.4)23.4 (17.6–28.4)0.756
Etiology0.697
 Alcohol abuse8 (88.9)24 (68.6)
 Gallstones05 (14.3)
 Others1 (11.1)6 (17.4)
Immediate cause of death0.956
 Septic shock5 (55.6)19 (54.3)
 Cardiogenic shock2 (22.2)7 (20.0)
 Cardiac arrhythmia2 (22.2)3 (8.6)
 Alcoholic ketoacidosis04 (11.4)
 Respiratory failure02 (5.7)
Duration of admission to death, hr48 (11–72)31 (5–2)0.148
Scoring systems and laboratory findings
 Ranson score6 (5–8)5 (1–7)0.120
 BISAP2.5 (0–4)3 (1–5)0.475
 CT severity index3 (0–8)2 (0–10)0.626
 APACHE-II19 (4–45)19.5 (10–45)0.506
 SOFA7 (3–12)7.5 (0–16)0.576
 Harmless AP1 (1–3)1 (0–3)0.479
 SAPS II34 (33–35)50 (23–93)0.286
Hematocrit, %40.7 (29.6–49.2)41.3 (27.8–54.3)0.731
Phosphate, mg/dL2.6 (1.3–5.1)5.8 (0.8–15.5)0.001
Potassium, mEq/L4.2 (3.4–6.5)4.3 (2.6–6.6)0.607
Sodium, mEq/L138 (109–142)131 (111–149)0.864
Albumin, g/dL3.5 (3.0–5.0)3.5 (1.7–5.0)0.864

Data are presented as median (range) or number (%).

RFS, refeeding syndrome; BMI, body mass index; BISAP, bedside index for severity of acute pancreatitis; CT, computed tomography; APACHE-II, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation-II; SOFA, sequential organic failure assessment; AP, acute pancreatitis; SAPS II, simplified acute physiology score II.

*Reference ranges (serum), conventional units; hematocrit, male 42% to 52%, female 37% to 47%; phosphate, 2.7–4.5 mg/dL; potassium, 3.5–5.1 mEq/L; sodium, 136–145 mEq/L; albumin, 3.5–5.2 g/dL.


References

  1. Lee KJ, Kim HM, Choi JS, Kim YJ, Kim YS, Cho JH. Comparison of predictive systems in severe acute pancreatitis according to the revised Atlanta classification. Pancreas 2016;45:46-50.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Cho JH, Choi JS, Hwang ET, et al. Usefulness of scheduled follow-up CT in discharged patients with acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2015;15:642-646.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Valverde-López F, Matas-Cobos AM, Alegría-Motte C, Jiménez-Rosales R, Úbeda-Muñoz M, Redondo-Cerezo E. BISAP, RANSON, lactate and others biomarkers in prediction of severe acute pancreatitis in a European cohort. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;32:1649-1656.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Crook MA, Hally V, Panteli JV. The importance of the refeeding syndrome. Nutrition 2001;17:632-637.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Mehanna H, Nankivell PC, Moledina J, Travis J. Refeeding syndrome: awareness, prevention and management. Head Neck Oncol 2009;1:4.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Dunn RL, Stettler N, Mascarenhas MR. Refeeding syndrome in hospitalized pediatric patients. Nutr Clin Pract 2003;18:327-332.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Fuentebella J, Kerner JA. Refeeding syndrome. Pediatr Clin North Am 2009;56:1201-1210.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Solomon SM, Kirby DF. The refeeding syndrome: a review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1990;14:90-97.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Katzman DK. Refeeding hospitalized adolescents with anorexia nervosa: is “start low, advance slow” urban legend or evidence based?. J Adolesc Health 2012;50:1-2.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Fernández López MT, López Otero MJ, Alvarez Vázquez P, Arias Delgado J, Varela Correa JJ. Refeeding syndrome. Farm Hosp 2009;33:183-193.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Kraft MD, Btaiche IF, Sacks GS. Review of the refeeding syndrome. Nutr Clin Pract 2005;20:625-633.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Khan LU, Ahmed J, Khan S, Macfie J. Refeeding syndrome: a literature review. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2011;2011 410971.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Gianotti L, Meier R, Lobo DN, et al. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: pancreas. Clin Nutr 2009;28:428-435.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Banks PA, Freeman ML; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2379-2400.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Gentile MG, Pastorelli P, Ciceri R, Manna GM, Collimedaglia S. Specialized refeeding treatment for anorexia nervosa patients suffering from extreme undernutrition. Clin Nutr 2010;29:627-632.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Webb GJ, Smith K, Thursby-Pelham F, Smith T, Stroud MA, Da Silva AN. Complications of emergency refeeding in anorexia nervosa: case series and review. Acute Med 2011;10:69-76.
    Pubmed
  17. Sachs K, Andersen D, Sommer J, Winkelman A, Mehler PS. Avoiding medical complications during the refeeding of patients with anorexia nervosa. Eat Disord 2015;23:411-421.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Friedli N, Stanga Z, Sobotka L, et al. Revisiting the refeeding syndrome: results of a systematic review. Nutrition 2017;35:151-160.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Nutrition support in adults: oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition (CG32). c2006. London: NICE. [cited 2019 Mar 19]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg32.
  20. Rio A, Whelan K, Goff L, Reidlinger DP, Smeeton N. Occurrence of refeeding syndrome in adults started on artificial nutrition support: prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002173.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Mehanna HM, Moledina J, Travis J. Refeeding syndrome: what it is, and how to prevent and treat it. BMJ 2008;336:1495-1498.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Veverbrants E, Arky RA. Effects of fasting and refeeding. I. Studies on sodium, potassium and water excretion on a constant electrolyte and fluid intake. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1969;29:55-62.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Preiser JC, van Zanten AR, Berger MM, et al. Metabolic and nutritional support of critically ill patients: consensus and controversies. Crit Care 2015;19:35.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Silvis SE, Paragas PD Jr. Paresthesias, weakness, seizures, and hypophosphatemia in patients receiving hyperalimentation. Gastroenterology 1972;62:513-520.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Hernández-Aranda JC, Gallo-Chico B, Luna-Cruz ML, et al. Malnutrition and total parenteral nutrition: a cohort study to determine the incidence of refeeding syndrome. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 1997;62:260-265.
    Pubmed
  26. Hayek ME, Eisenberg PG. Severe hypophosphatemia following the institution of enteral feedings. Arch Surg 1989;124:1325-1328.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Hearing SD. Refeeding syndrome. BMJ 2004;328:908-909.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Marik PE, Bedigian MK. Refeeding hypophosphatemia in critically ill patients in an intensive care unit: a prospective study. Arch Surg 1996;131:1043-1047.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Nunes G, Brito M, Santos CA, Fonseca J. Refeeding syndrome in the gastroenterology practice: how concerned should we be?. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;30:1270-1276.
    Pubmed CrossRef
Gut and Liver

Vol.18 No.5
September, 2024

pISSN 1976-2283
eISSN 2005-1212

qrcode
qrcode

Share this article on :

  • line

Popular Keywords

Gut and LiverQR code Download
qr-code

Editorial Office