Indexed In : Science Citation Index Expanded(SCIE), MEDLINE,
Pubmed/Pubmed Central, Elsevier Bibliographic, Google Scholar,
Databases(Scopus & Embase), KCI, KoreaMed, DOAJ
Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut atnd Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. +MORE
Yong Chan Lee |
Professor of Medicine Director, Gastrointestinal Research Laboratory Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Univ. California San Francisco San Francisco, USA |
Jong Pil Im | Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
Robert S. Bresalier | University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA |
Steven H. Itzkowitz | Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY, USA |
All papers submitted to Gut and Liver are reviewed by the editorial team before being sent out for an external peer review to rule out papers that have low priority, insufficient originality, scientific flaws, or the absence of a message of importance to the readers of the Journal. A decision about these papers will usually be made within two or three weeks.
The remaining articles are usually sent to two reviewers. It would be very helpful if you could suggest a selection of reviewers and include their contact details. We may not always use the reviewers you recommend, but suggesting reviewers will make our reviewer database much richer; in the end, everyone will benefit. We reserve the right to return manuscripts in which no reviewers are suggested.
The final responsibility for the decision to accept or reject lies with the editors. In many cases, papers may be rejected despite favorable reviews because of editorial policy or a lack of space. The editor retains the right to determine publication priorities, the style of the paper, and to request, if necessary, that the material submitted be shortened for publication.
Seung Jun Han1, Sang Gyun Kim1, Joo Hyun Lim2, Ji Min Choi2, Sooyeon Oh1, Jae Yong Park1, Jung Kim1, Joo Sung Kim1, Hyun Chae Jung1
Correspondence to: Sang Gyun Kim, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea, Tel: +82-2-740-8112, Fax: +82-2-743-6701, E-mail: harley1333@hanmail.net
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Gut Liver 2018;12(2):133-141. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl17073
Published online October 27, 2017, Published date March 15, 2018
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
Gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia due to Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of EGC were retrospectively reviewed. Changes in precancerous lesions and development of metachronous cancer were compared according to In total, 565 patients were followed for over 5 years after endoscopic resection of EGC. The grade of atrophy on corpus was significantly lower in the Background/Aims
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Keywords:
Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide.1 Early gastric cancer (EGC) is defined as a malignancy that does not invade deeper than the submucosa, irrespective of lymph node involvement (T1, any N). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for EGC has been widely accepted as a standard treatment in Korea and Japan. However, periodic surveillance is necessary for detection of metachronous cancers even after curative ESD.2,3
Whether the eradication of
The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effect of
Patients who underwent ESD for EGC between April 2005 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed at Seoul National University Hospital. Indications for ESD included differentiated adenocarcinoma, tumor confined to the mucosa, gross tumor size no more than 2 cm in diameter, and no evidence of distant metastasis. Patients were excluded from the analysis, if (1) they had a prior history of gastric cancer; (2) information was not available for
The location of the lesions was divided into three portions according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer: upper, middle, and lower.15 In almost all cases, additional biopsy samples were obtained during ESD from two sites in the lesser curvature of the antrum and two sites in the lesser curvature of the corpus to test for the presence of
Follow-up endoscopic examination was scheduled at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter.
Metachronous cancer was defined as the new carcinoma that occurred at another site in the stomach one year after ESD. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Seoul National University Hospital (IRB number: H-1519-082-688) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Demographic data were compared using the independent t-test or analysis of variance test for variables with a parametric distribution, and Pearson chi-square test or the Fisher exact test to compare the proportions. Changes in the histological grades of gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The cumulative incidence of metachronous cancer was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared between the groups were performed using the log-rank test. The statistical significance of metachronous cancer development according to variables was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. p-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
In total, 783 patients were reviewed and 218 were excluded in the analysis; three patients with prior histories of gastric cancers; 20 without the information about the initial
Finally, 565 patients were assessed for eligibility. The median follow-up periods for the negative group (157 patients), eradicated group (212 patients), and persistent group (196 patients) were 60, 61, and 60 months (range, 12 to 122 months), respectively. There were no significant differences among the groups in age, sex, location, size, depth of invasion, and tumor differentiation. The proportion of patients with corpus mucosal atrophy was significantly lower in the negative group than the eradicated and the persistent groups (p=0.020). However, the proportion of patients with antral mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia in both the antrum and corpus did not differ among the groups (Table 1).
Approximately 70% of patients had antral mucosal atrophy at the time of ESD. There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients with antral mucosal atrophy among the groups during follow-up. The initial proportion of patients with corpus mucosal atrophy did not differ significantly between the eradicated and the persistent group. At the last follow-up, corpus mucosal atrophy was more prominent in the persistent group than the eradicated and the negative groups (p=0.015 and p<0.001, respectively). The proportions of patients with intestinal metaplasia did not differ among the groups during follow-up (Fig. 1).
Although the mean histological grades for corpus mucosal atrophy did not differ between the eradicated and the persistent groups at baseline, it was significantly lower in the eradicated group than the persistent group at the last follow-up (1.03 vs 1.29, respectively; p=0.029). There were no significant differences in the grades of antral mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia in both the antrum and the corpus between the groups during follow-up (Table 2).
During a median follow-up period of 60 months (range, 12 to 122 months), metachronous gastric cancer had developed in 50 patients (50/565, 8.8%); 20 in the negative group (20/157, 12.7%), 12 in the eradicated group (12/212, 5.7%), and 18 in the persistent group (18/196, 9.2%). The incidence of metachronous cancer was lower in the eradicated group than the other groups without statistical significance (p=0.059). The median interval between ESD and the development of metachronous cancer was 36 months in the negative group, 52.5 months in the eradicated group, and 42.5 months in the persistent group. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with metachronous cancer among the groups (Table 3).
In patients less than 70 years of age, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative incidence rate of metachronous cancer was significantly lower in the eradicated group than the negative and the persistent groups (p=0.001 and p=0.018, respectively) (Fig. 2). In this subgroup, the mean histological grade of corpus mucosal atrophy at baseline was lower in the negative group than the others. At the last follow-up, the mean histological grade of corpus mucosal atrophy of the negative group was lower than that of the persistent group, but not different from that of the eradicated group (Table 4). There were no significant differences in the mean histological grades of precancerous lesions among all groups at baseline and the last follow-up in patients not less than 70 years of age. In subgroup analyses of patients less than 65 years of age, the cumulative incidence rate of metachronous cancer development was consistently lower in the eradicated group than the negative and the persistent group (p=0.014 and p=0.031, respectively).
Cox regression analysis showed that the age was an independent risk factor for metachronous cancer development (hazard ratio, 1.059; 95% confidence interval, 1.001 to 1.120; p=0.045). Sex, grades of precancerous lesions and
This retrospective study aimed to investigate the long-term effect of
On the contrary, the groups did not differ significantly in the proportions of patients with antral mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia. Many studies reported different results concerning the changes in precancerous lesions after
During the follow-up period, metachronous cancer had developed in 8.8% of patients, which did not differ significantly between the groups. In a prospective study,
In subgroup analyses of younger patients, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative incidence rate of metachronous cancer development was lower in the eradicated group than in the persistent and the negative groups. The difference of metachronous cancer development in the Kaplan-Meier curves was widened at a follow-up period of 72 to 84 months, and continued to widen thereafter. The mean histological grades of the corpus mucosal atrophy were not different between the negative and the eradicated groups at the last follow-up in subgroup of younger patients. Considering the eradicated group showed significantly higher histological grade than the negative group at baseline in this subgroup, this indicate that
Although
Our study had several limitations. As previous history of
In conclusion,
This work was supported by Promising-Pioneering Researcher Program through Seoul National University (SNU) in 2015.
Author contributions: S.J.H. and S.G.K. carried out study design, data analysis, and interpretation. S.J.H. carried out manuscript drafting. J.H.L., J.M.C., S.O., J.Y.P., J.K., J.S.K., and H.C.J. participated in manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
N, negative group; E, eradicated group; P, persistent group.
N, negative group; E, eradicated group; P, persistent group.
Baseline Characteristics
Variable | Negative group | Eradicated group | Persistent group | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 157 | 212 | 196 | |
Age, yr | 62.9±8.1 | 61.1±8.1 | 61±9 | 0.068 |
Sex | 0.081 | |||
Male | 131 (83.4) | 165 (77.8) | 144 (73.5) | |
Female | 26 (16.6) | 47 (22.2) | 52 (26.5) | |
Location of tumor | 0.380 | |||
Upper third | 4 (2.5) | 9 (4.2) | 10 (5.1) | |
Middle third | 45 (28.7) | 70 (33) | 50 (25.5) | |
Lower third | 108 (68.8) | 133 (62.7) | 136 (69.4) | |
Size of tumor, mm | 18.3±11.4 | 18.3±12.5 | 17.9±11.9 | 0.932 |
Depth of invasion of tumor | 0.481 | |||
Lamina propria | 77 (49) | 97 (45.8) | 94 (48) | |
Muscularis mucosa | 66 (42) | 90 (42.5) | 89 (45.4) | |
Submucosa | 14 (8.9) | 25 (11.8) | 13 (6.6) | |
Histology of tumor | 0.782 | |||
Well differentiated | 90 (57.3) | 127 (59.9) | 121 (61.7) | |
Moderately differentiated | 62 (39.5) | 80 (37.7) | 69 (35.2) | |
Poorly differentiated | 5 (3.2) | 4 (1.9) | 4 (2.0) | |
Poorly cohesive | 0 | 1 (0.5) | 2 (1.0) | |
Lauren’s classification of tumor | 0.712 | |||
Intestinal | 152 (96.8) | 209 (98.6) | 189 (96.4) | |
Diffuse | 3 (1.9) | 2 (0.9) | 4 (2.0) | |
Mixed | 2 (1.3) | 1 (0.5) | 3 (1.5) | |
Antral mucosal atrophy | 0.671 | |||
None | 38 (24.2) | 43 (20.3) | 34 (17.3) | |
Mild | 32 (20.4) | 39 (18.4) | 39 (19.9) | |
Moderate | 24 (15.3) | 38 (17.9) | 40 (20.4) | |
Marked | 7 (4.5) | 9 (4.2) | 12 (6.1) | |
Non-applicable | 56 (35.7) | 83 (39.2) | 71 (36.2) | |
Corpus mucosal atrophy | 0.020 | |||
None | 61 (38.9) | 52 (24.5) | 53 (27.0) | |
Mild | 22 (14.0) | 41 (19.3) | 30 (15.3) | |
Moderate | 17 (10.8) | 39 (18.4) | 35 (17.9) | |
Marked | 11 (7.0) | 11 (5.2) | 19 (9.7) | |
Non-applicable | 46 (29.3) | 69 (32.5) | 59 (30.1) | |
Antral intestinal metaplasia | 0.084 | |||
None | 25 (15.9) | 32 (15.1) | 34 (17.3) | |
Mild | 45 (28.7) | 47 (22.2) | 52 (26.5) | |
Moderate | 62 (39.5) | 89 (42.0) | 59 (30.1) | |
Marked | 20 (12.7) | 38 (17.9) | 45 (23.0) | |
Non-applicable | 5 (3.2) | 6 (2.8) | 6 (3.1) | |
Corpus intestinal metaplasia | 0.429 | |||
None | 56 (35.7) | 66 (31.1) | 62 (31.6) | |
Mild | 33 (21.0) | 38 (17.9) | 34 (17.3) | |
Moderate | 28 (17.8) | 61 (28.8) | 52 (26.5) | |
Marked | 32 (20.4) | 42 (19.8) | 39 (19.9) | |
Non-applicable | 8 (5.1) | 5 (2.4) | 9 (4.6) | |
Follow-up duration, mo | 60.0 (44.5–74.5) | 61.0 (49.0–87.8) | 60.0 (48.0–78.0) |
Changes in the Average Number of Precancerous Lesions
Baseline | p-value | The last follow-up | p-value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | E | P | N | E | P | |||
Mucosal atrophy | ||||||||
Antrum | 1.00 | 1.10 | 1.24 | 0.156 | 1.10 | 1.46 | 1.28 | 0.013 (N vs E) * |
Corpus | 0.80 | 1.06 | 1.15 | 0.015 (N vs E)* | 0.79 | 1.03 | 1.29 | <0.001 (N vs P)* |
0.009 (N vs P)* | 0.029 (E vs P) * | |||||||
Intestinal metaplasia | ||||||||
Antrum | 1.51 | 1.65 | 1.61 | 0.357 | 1.68 | 1.78 | 1.69 | 0.492 |
Corpus | 1.24 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 0.489 | 1.16 | 1.37 | 1.30 | 0.242 |
Data are presented as mean.
Kruskal-Wallis test. Patients with no precancerous lesion were scored as 0; mild, 1; moderate, 2; and marked, 3 based on the updated Sydney system.
N, negative group; E, eradicated group; P, persistent group.
Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Metachronous Cancer
Variable | Negative group | Eradicated group | Persistent group | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 20 | 12 | 18 | |
Age, yr | 63.9±7.8 | 65.3±8.4 | 59.6±8.6 | 0.135 |
Sex | 0.822 | |||
Male | 19 (95) | 11 (91.7) | 16 (88.9) | |
Female | 1 (5) | 1 (8.3) | 2 (11.1) | |
Location of tumor | 0.888 | |||
Upper third | 0 | 0 | 1 (5.6) | |
Middle third | 6 (30) | 3 (25) | 6 (33.3) | |
Lower third | 14 (70) | 9 (75) | 11 (61.1) | |
Size of tumor, mm | 17.6±10.3 | 23.6±14.0 | 17.8±7.0 | 0.234 |
Depth of invasion of tumor | 0.383 | |||
Lamina propria | 10 (50) | 4 (33.3) | 9 (50) | |
Muscularis mucosa | 7 (35) | 7 (58.3) | 9 (50) | |
Submucosa | 3 (15) | 1 (8.3) | 0 | |
Histology of tumor | 0.620 | |||
Well differentiated | 11 (55) | 5 (41.7) | 11 (61.1) | |
Moderately differentiated | 8 (40) | 6 (50) | 7 (38.9) | |
Poorly differentiated | 1 (5) | 0 | 0 | |
Poorly cohesive | 0 | 1 (8.3) | 0 | |
Lauren’s classification of tumor | 0.537 | |||
Intestinal | 18 (95.0) | 12 (100.0) | 18 (100.0) | |
Diffuse | 1 (2.5) | 0 | 0 | |
Mixed | 1 (2.5) | 0 | 0 | |
Antral mucosal atrophy | 0.881 | |||
None | 2 (10.0) | 0 | 2 (11.1) | |
Mild | 7 (35.0) | 4 (33.3) | 4 (22.2) | |
Moderate | 4 (20.0) | 3 (25.0) | 4 (22.2) | |
Marked | 1 (5.0) | 1 (8.3) | 2 (11.1) | |
Non-applicable | 6 (30.0) | 4 (33.3) | 6 (33.3) | |
Corpus mucosal atrophy | 0.087 | |||
None | 8 (40.0) | 0 | 3 (16.7) | |
Mild | 2 (10.0) | 5 (41.7) | 3 (16.7) | |
Moderate | 4 (20.0) | 2 (16.7) | 3 (16.7) | |
Marked | 1 (5.0) | 1 (8.3) | 3 (16.7) | |
Non-applicable | 5 (25.0) | 4 (33.3) | 6 (33.3) | |
Antral intestinal metaplasia | 0.697 | |||
None | 2 (10.0) | 1 (8.3) | 1 (5.6) | |
Mild | 8 (40.0) | 2 (16.7) | 5 (27.8) | |
Moderate | 5 (25.0) | 5 (41.7) | 4 (22.2) | |
Marked | 4 (20.0) | 4 (33.3) | 7 (38.9) | |
Non-applicable | 1 (5.0) | 0 | 1 (5.6) | |
Corpus intestinal metaplasia | 0.770 | |||
None | 5 (27.8) | 1 (8.3) | 5 (29.4) | |
Mild | 4 (22.2) | 3 (25) | 2 (11.8) | |
Moderate | 6 (33.3) | 5 (41.7) | 5 (29.4) | |
Marked | 3 (16.7) | 3 (25) | 5 (29.4) | |
Non-applicable | 2 (10.0) | 0 | 1 (5.6) | |
Follow-up duration, mo | 36.0 (25.2–47.0) | 52.5 (37.8–74.5) | 42.5 (34.5–84.3) |
Changes in the Average Number of Precancerous Lesions in Patients Less Than 70 Years of Age
Baseline | p-value | The last follow-up | p-value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | E | P | N | E | P | |||
Mucosal atrophy | ||||||||
Antrum | 0.92 | 1.05 | 1.17 | 0.224 | 1.16 | 1.43 | 1.27 | 0.183 |
Corpus | 0.76 | 1.05 | 1.13 | 0.025 (N vs E)* | 0.78 | 1.08 | 1.28 | 0.011 (N vs P)* |
0.001 (N vs P)* | ||||||||
Intestinal metaplasia | ||||||||
Antrum | 1.48 | 1.58 | 1.56 | 0.562 | 1.71 | 1.74 | 1.67 | 0.844 |
Corpus | 1.25 | 1.34 | 1.39 | 0.616 | 1.13 | 1.34 | 1.24 | 0.302 |
Data are presented as mean.
Kruskal-Wallis test. Patients with no precancerous lesion numbered 0; mild 1; moderate 2; and marked 3 based on the updated Sydney system.
N, negative group; E, eradicated group; P, persistent group.
Risk Factors for the Development of Metachronous Cancer
Variable | HR | 95% CI | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Age (each incremental year) | 1.059 | 1.001–1.120 | 0.045 |
Male (female-reference) | 2.827 | 0.654–12.216 | 0.164 |
Antral mucosal atrophy (each incremental grade) | 1.578 | 0.920–2.706 | 0.098 |
Corpus mucosal atrophy (each incremental grade) | 0.790 | 0.469–1.330 | 0.375 |
Antral intestinal metaplasia (each incremental grade) | 0.743 | 0.440–1.254 | 0.267 |
Corpus intestinal metaplasia (each incremental grade) | 1.453 | 0.915–2.308 | 0.113 |
Negative group (persistent group-reference) | 1.583 | 0.629–3.985 | 0.330 |
Eradicated group (persistent group-reference) | 0.862 | 0.309–2.402 | 0.776 |
Gut and Liver 2018; 12(2): 133-141
Published online March 15, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl17073
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
Seung Jun Han1, Sang Gyun Kim1, Joo Hyun Lim2, Ji Min Choi2, Sooyeon Oh1, Jae Yong Park1, Jung Kim1, Joo Sung Kim1, Hyun Chae Jung1
1Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, 2Department of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to:Sang Gyun Kim, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea, Tel: +82-2-740-8112, Fax: +82-2-743-6701, E-mail: harley1333@hanmail.net
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia due to Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of EGC were retrospectively reviewed. Changes in precancerous lesions and development of metachronous cancer were compared according to In total, 565 patients were followed for over 5 years after endoscopic resection of EGC. The grade of atrophy on corpus was significantly lower in the Background/Aims
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Keywords:
Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide.1 Early gastric cancer (EGC) is defined as a malignancy that does not invade deeper than the submucosa, irrespective of lymph node involvement (T1, any N). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for EGC has been widely accepted as a standard treatment in Korea and Japan. However, periodic surveillance is necessary for detection of metachronous cancers even after curative ESD.2,3
Whether the eradication of
The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effect of
Patients who underwent ESD for EGC between April 2005 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed at Seoul National University Hospital. Indications for ESD included differentiated adenocarcinoma, tumor confined to the mucosa, gross tumor size no more than 2 cm in diameter, and no evidence of distant metastasis. Patients were excluded from the analysis, if (1) they had a prior history of gastric cancer; (2) information was not available for
The location of the lesions was divided into three portions according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer: upper, middle, and lower.15 In almost all cases, additional biopsy samples were obtained during ESD from two sites in the lesser curvature of the antrum and two sites in the lesser curvature of the corpus to test for the presence of
Follow-up endoscopic examination was scheduled at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter.
Metachronous cancer was defined as the new carcinoma that occurred at another site in the stomach one year after ESD. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Seoul National University Hospital (IRB number: H-1519-082-688) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Demographic data were compared using the independent t-test or analysis of variance test for variables with a parametric distribution, and Pearson chi-square test or the Fisher exact test to compare the proportions. Changes in the histological grades of gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The cumulative incidence of metachronous cancer was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared between the groups were performed using the log-rank test. The statistical significance of metachronous cancer development according to variables was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. p-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
In total, 783 patients were reviewed and 218 were excluded in the analysis; three patients with prior histories of gastric cancers; 20 without the information about the initial
Finally, 565 patients were assessed for eligibility. The median follow-up periods for the negative group (157 patients), eradicated group (212 patients), and persistent group (196 patients) were 60, 61, and 60 months (range, 12 to 122 months), respectively. There were no significant differences among the groups in age, sex, location, size, depth of invasion, and tumor differentiation. The proportion of patients with corpus mucosal atrophy was significantly lower in the negative group than the eradicated and the persistent groups (p=0.020). However, the proportion of patients with antral mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia in both the antrum and corpus did not differ among the groups (Table 1).
Approximately 70% of patients had antral mucosal atrophy at the time of ESD. There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients with antral mucosal atrophy among the groups during follow-up. The initial proportion of patients with corpus mucosal atrophy did not differ significantly between the eradicated and the persistent group. At the last follow-up, corpus mucosal atrophy was more prominent in the persistent group than the eradicated and the negative groups (p=0.015 and p<0.001, respectively). The proportions of patients with intestinal metaplasia did not differ among the groups during follow-up (Fig. 1).
Although the mean histological grades for corpus mucosal atrophy did not differ between the eradicated and the persistent groups at baseline, it was significantly lower in the eradicated group than the persistent group at the last follow-up (1.03 vs 1.29, respectively; p=0.029). There were no significant differences in the grades of antral mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia in both the antrum and the corpus between the groups during follow-up (Table 2).
During a median follow-up period of 60 months (range, 12 to 122 months), metachronous gastric cancer had developed in 50 patients (50/565, 8.8%); 20 in the negative group (20/157, 12.7%), 12 in the eradicated group (12/212, 5.7%), and 18 in the persistent group (18/196, 9.2%). The incidence of metachronous cancer was lower in the eradicated group than the other groups without statistical significance (p=0.059). The median interval between ESD and the development of metachronous cancer was 36 months in the negative group, 52.5 months in the eradicated group, and 42.5 months in the persistent group. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with metachronous cancer among the groups (Table 3).
In patients less than 70 years of age, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative incidence rate of metachronous cancer was significantly lower in the eradicated group than the negative and the persistent groups (p=0.001 and p=0.018, respectively) (Fig. 2). In this subgroup, the mean histological grade of corpus mucosal atrophy at baseline was lower in the negative group than the others. At the last follow-up, the mean histological grade of corpus mucosal atrophy of the negative group was lower than that of the persistent group, but not different from that of the eradicated group (Table 4). There were no significant differences in the mean histological grades of precancerous lesions among all groups at baseline and the last follow-up in patients not less than 70 years of age. In subgroup analyses of patients less than 65 years of age, the cumulative incidence rate of metachronous cancer development was consistently lower in the eradicated group than the negative and the persistent group (p=0.014 and p=0.031, respectively).
Cox regression analysis showed that the age was an independent risk factor for metachronous cancer development (hazard ratio, 1.059; 95% confidence interval, 1.001 to 1.120; p=0.045). Sex, grades of precancerous lesions and
This retrospective study aimed to investigate the long-term effect of
On the contrary, the groups did not differ significantly in the proportions of patients with antral mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia. Many studies reported different results concerning the changes in precancerous lesions after
During the follow-up period, metachronous cancer had developed in 8.8% of patients, which did not differ significantly between the groups. In a prospective study,
In subgroup analyses of younger patients, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative incidence rate of metachronous cancer development was lower in the eradicated group than in the persistent and the negative groups. The difference of metachronous cancer development in the Kaplan-Meier curves was widened at a follow-up period of 72 to 84 months, and continued to widen thereafter. The mean histological grades of the corpus mucosal atrophy were not different between the negative and the eradicated groups at the last follow-up in subgroup of younger patients. Considering the eradicated group showed significantly higher histological grade than the negative group at baseline in this subgroup, this indicate that
Although
Our study had several limitations. As previous history of
In conclusion,
This work was supported by Promising-Pioneering Researcher Program through Seoul National University (SNU) in 2015.
Author contributions: S.J.H. and S.G.K. carried out study design, data analysis, and interpretation. S.J.H. carried out manuscript drafting. J.H.L., J.M.C., S.O., J.Y.P., J.K., J.S.K., and H.C.J. participated in manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
N, negative group; E, eradicated group; P, persistent group.
N, negative group; E, eradicated group; P, persistent group.
Table 1 Baseline Characteristics
Variable | Negative group | Eradicated group | Persistent group | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 157 | 212 | 196 | |
Age, yr | 62.9±8.1 | 61.1±8.1 | 61±9 | 0.068 |
Sex | 0.081 | |||
Male | 131 (83.4) | 165 (77.8) | 144 (73.5) | |
Female | 26 (16.6) | 47 (22.2) | 52 (26.5) | |
Location of tumor | 0.380 | |||
Upper third | 4 (2.5) | 9 (4.2) | 10 (5.1) | |
Middle third | 45 (28.7) | 70 (33) | 50 (25.5) | |
Lower third | 108 (68.8) | 133 (62.7) | 136 (69.4) | |
Size of tumor, mm | 18.3±11.4 | 18.3±12.5 | 17.9±11.9 | 0.932 |
Depth of invasion of tumor | 0.481 | |||
Lamina propria | 77 (49) | 97 (45.8) | 94 (48) | |
Muscularis mucosa | 66 (42) | 90 (42.5) | 89 (45.4) | |
Submucosa | 14 (8.9) | 25 (11.8) | 13 (6.6) | |
Histology of tumor | 0.782 | |||
Well differentiated | 90 (57.3) | 127 (59.9) | 121 (61.7) | |
Moderately differentiated | 62 (39.5) | 80 (37.7) | 69 (35.2) | |
Poorly differentiated | 5 (3.2) | 4 (1.9) | 4 (2.0) | |
Poorly cohesive | 0 | 1 (0.5) | 2 (1.0) | |
Lauren’s classification of tumor | 0.712 | |||
Intestinal | 152 (96.8) | 209 (98.6) | 189 (96.4) | |
Diffuse | 3 (1.9) | 2 (0.9) | 4 (2.0) | |
Mixed | 2 (1.3) | 1 (0.5) | 3 (1.5) | |
Antral mucosal atrophy | 0.671 | |||
None | 38 (24.2) | 43 (20.3) | 34 (17.3) | |
Mild | 32 (20.4) | 39 (18.4) | 39 (19.9) | |
Moderate | 24 (15.3) | 38 (17.9) | 40 (20.4) | |
Marked | 7 (4.5) | 9 (4.2) | 12 (6.1) | |
Non-applicable | 56 (35.7) | 83 (39.2) | 71 (36.2) | |
Corpus mucosal atrophy | 0.020 | |||
None | 61 (38.9) | 52 (24.5) | 53 (27.0) | |
Mild | 22 (14.0) | 41 (19.3) | 30 (15.3) | |
Moderate | 17 (10.8) | 39 (18.4) | 35 (17.9) | |
Marked | 11 (7.0) | 11 (5.2) | 19 (9.7) | |
Non-applicable | 46 (29.3) | 69 (32.5) | 59 (30.1) | |
Antral intestinal metaplasia | 0.084 | |||
None | 25 (15.9) | 32 (15.1) | 34 (17.3) | |
Mild | 45 (28.7) | 47 (22.2) | 52 (26.5) | |
Moderate | 62 (39.5) | 89 (42.0) | 59 (30.1) | |
Marked | 20 (12.7) | 38 (17.9) | 45 (23.0) | |
Non-applicable | 5 (3.2) | 6 (2.8) | 6 (3.1) | |
Corpus intestinal metaplasia | 0.429 | |||
None | 56 (35.7) | 66 (31.1) | 62 (31.6) | |
Mild | 33 (21.0) | 38 (17.9) | 34 (17.3) | |
Moderate | 28 (17.8) | 61 (28.8) | 52 (26.5) | |
Marked | 32 (20.4) | 42 (19.8) | 39 (19.9) | |
Non-applicable | 8 (5.1) | 5 (2.4) | 9 (4.6) | |
Follow-up duration, mo | 60.0 (44.5–74.5) | 61.0 (49.0–87.8) | 60.0 (48.0–78.0) |
Data are presented as mean±SD, number (%), or median (interquartile range).
Table 2 Changes in the Average Number of Precancerous Lesions
Baseline | p-value | The last follow-up | p-value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | E | P | N | E | P | |||
Mucosal atrophy | ||||||||
Antrum | 1.00 | 1.10 | 1.24 | 0.156 | 1.10 | 1.46 | 1.28 | 0.013 (N vs E) * |
Corpus | 0.80 | 1.06 | 1.15 | 0.015 (N vs E)* | 0.79 | 1.03 | 1.29 | <0.001 (N vs P)* |
0.009 (N vs P)* | 0.029 (E vs P) * | |||||||
Intestinal metaplasia | ||||||||
Antrum | 1.51 | 1.65 | 1.61 | 0.357 | 1.68 | 1.78 | 1.69 | 0.492 |
Corpus | 1.24 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 0.489 | 1.16 | 1.37 | 1.30 | 0.242 |
Data are presented as mean.
Kruskal-Wallis test. Patients with no precancerous lesion were scored as 0; mild, 1; moderate, 2; and marked, 3 based on the updated Sydney system.
N, negative group; E, eradicated group; P, persistent group.
Table 3 Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Metachronous Cancer
Variable | Negative group | Eradicated group | Persistent group | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 20 | 12 | 18 | |
Age, yr | 63.9±7.8 | 65.3±8.4 | 59.6±8.6 | 0.135 |
Sex | 0.822 | |||
Male | 19 (95) | 11 (91.7) | 16 (88.9) | |
Female | 1 (5) | 1 (8.3) | 2 (11.1) | |
Location of tumor | 0.888 | |||
Upper third | 0 | 0 | 1 (5.6) | |
Middle third | 6 (30) | 3 (25) | 6 (33.3) | |
Lower third | 14 (70) | 9 (75) | 11 (61.1) | |
Size of tumor, mm | 17.6±10.3 | 23.6±14.0 | 17.8±7.0 | 0.234 |
Depth of invasion of tumor | 0.383 | |||
Lamina propria | 10 (50) | 4 (33.3) | 9 (50) | |
Muscularis mucosa | 7 (35) | 7 (58.3) | 9 (50) | |
Submucosa | 3 (15) | 1 (8.3) | 0 | |
Histology of tumor | 0.620 | |||
Well differentiated | 11 (55) | 5 (41.7) | 11 (61.1) | |
Moderately differentiated | 8 (40) | 6 (50) | 7 (38.9) | |
Poorly differentiated | 1 (5) | 0 | 0 | |
Poorly cohesive | 0 | 1 (8.3) | 0 | |
Lauren’s classification of tumor | 0.537 | |||
Intestinal | 18 (95.0) | 12 (100.0) | 18 (100.0) | |
Diffuse | 1 (2.5) | 0 | 0 | |
Mixed | 1 (2.5) | 0 | 0 | |
Antral mucosal atrophy | 0.881 | |||
None | 2 (10.0) | 0 | 2 (11.1) | |
Mild | 7 (35.0) | 4 (33.3) | 4 (22.2) | |
Moderate | 4 (20.0) | 3 (25.0) | 4 (22.2) | |
Marked | 1 (5.0) | 1 (8.3) | 2 (11.1) | |
Non-applicable | 6 (30.0) | 4 (33.3) | 6 (33.3) | |
Corpus mucosal atrophy | 0.087 | |||
None | 8 (40.0) | 0 | 3 (16.7) | |
Mild | 2 (10.0) | 5 (41.7) | 3 (16.7) | |
Moderate | 4 (20.0) | 2 (16.7) | 3 (16.7) | |
Marked | 1 (5.0) | 1 (8.3) | 3 (16.7) | |
Non-applicable | 5 (25.0) | 4 (33.3) | 6 (33.3) | |
Antral intestinal metaplasia | 0.697 | |||
None | 2 (10.0) | 1 (8.3) | 1 (5.6) | |
Mild | 8 (40.0) | 2 (16.7) | 5 (27.8) | |
Moderate | 5 (25.0) | 5 (41.7) | 4 (22.2) | |
Marked | 4 (20.0) | 4 (33.3) | 7 (38.9) | |
Non-applicable | 1 (5.0) | 0 | 1 (5.6) | |
Corpus intestinal metaplasia | 0.770 | |||
None | 5 (27.8) | 1 (8.3) | 5 (29.4) | |
Mild | 4 (22.2) | 3 (25) | 2 (11.8) | |
Moderate | 6 (33.3) | 5 (41.7) | 5 (29.4) | |
Marked | 3 (16.7) | 3 (25) | 5 (29.4) | |
Non-applicable | 2 (10.0) | 0 | 1 (5.6) | |
Follow-up duration, mo | 36.0 (25.2–47.0) | 52.5 (37.8–74.5) | 42.5 (34.5–84.3) |
Data are presented as mean±SD, number (%), or median (interquartile range).
Table 4 Changes in the Average Number of Precancerous Lesions in Patients Less Than 70 Years of Age
Baseline | p-value | The last follow-up | p-value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | E | P | N | E | P | |||
Mucosal atrophy | ||||||||
Antrum | 0.92 | 1.05 | 1.17 | 0.224 | 1.16 | 1.43 | 1.27 | 0.183 |
Corpus | 0.76 | 1.05 | 1.13 | 0.025 (N vs E)* | 0.78 | 1.08 | 1.28 | 0.011 (N vs P)* |
0.001 (N vs P)* | ||||||||
Intestinal metaplasia | ||||||||
Antrum | 1.48 | 1.58 | 1.56 | 0.562 | 1.71 | 1.74 | 1.67 | 0.844 |
Corpus | 1.25 | 1.34 | 1.39 | 0.616 | 1.13 | 1.34 | 1.24 | 0.302 |
Data are presented as mean.
Kruskal-Wallis test. Patients with no precancerous lesion numbered 0; mild 1; moderate 2; and marked 3 based on the updated Sydney system.
N, negative group; E, eradicated group; P, persistent group.
Table 5 Risk Factors for the Development of Metachronous Cancer
Variable | HR | 95% CI | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Age (each incremental year) | 1.059 | 1.001–1.120 | 0.045 |
Male (female-reference) | 2.827 | 0.654–12.216 | 0.164 |
Antral mucosal atrophy (each incremental grade) | 1.578 | 0.920–2.706 | 0.098 |
Corpus mucosal atrophy (each incremental grade) | 0.790 | 0.469–1.330 | 0.375 |
Antral intestinal metaplasia (each incremental grade) | 0.743 | 0.440–1.254 | 0.267 |
Corpus intestinal metaplasia (each incremental grade) | 1.453 | 0.915–2.308 | 0.113 |
Negative group (persistent group-reference) | 1.583 | 0.629–3.985 | 0.330 |
Eradicated group (persistent group-reference) | 0.862 | 0.309–2.402 | 0.776 |
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.