Indexed In : Science Citation Index Expanded(SCIE), MEDLINE,
Pubmed/Pubmed Central, Elsevier Bibliographic, Google Scholar,
Databases(Scopus & Embase), KCI, KoreaMed, DOAJ
Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut atnd Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. +MORE
Yong Chan Lee |
Professor of Medicine Director, Gastrointestinal Research Laboratory Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Univ. California San Francisco San Francisco, USA |
Jong Pil Im | Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
Robert S. Bresalier | University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA |
Steven H. Itzkowitz | Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY, USA |
All papers submitted to Gut and Liver are reviewed by the editorial team before being sent out for an external peer review to rule out papers that have low priority, insufficient originality, scientific flaws, or the absence of a message of importance to the readers of the Journal. A decision about these papers will usually be made within two or three weeks.
The remaining articles are usually sent to two reviewers. It would be very helpful if you could suggest a selection of reviewers and include their contact details. We may not always use the reviewers you recommend, but suggesting reviewers will make our reviewer database much richer; in the end, everyone will benefit. We reserve the right to return manuscripts in which no reviewers are suggested.
The final responsibility for the decision to accept or reject lies with the editors. In many cases, papers may be rejected despite favorable reviews because of editorial policy or a lack of space. The editor retains the right to determine publication priorities, the style of the paper, and to request, if necessary, that the material submitted be shortened for publication.
Jin-Seok Park1, Seok Jeong1,2, Don Haeng Lee1,2,3, Jong Ho Moon4, Kyu Taek Lee5, Seok Ho Dong6
Correspondence to: Seok Ho Dong, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea, Tel: +82-2-958-8200, Fax: +82-2-968-1848, E-mail: gidrdong@hanmail.net
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Gut Liver 2016;10(6):969-974. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl15112
Published online May 16, 2016, Published date November 15, 2016
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
The covered self-expandable metal stent (CMS) was developed to prevent tumor ingrowth-induced stent occlusion during the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. However, complications such as cholecystitis, pancreatitis, and stent migration can occur after the endoscopic insertion of CMSs. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a double-layered CMS (DCMS) for the management of malignant bile duct obstruction. DCMSs were endoscopically introduced into 59 patients with unresectable malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction at four tertiary referral centers, and the patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Both the technical and functional success rates were 100%. Procedure-related complications including pancreatitis, cholangitis, stent migration, and liver abscess occurred in five patients (8.5%). The median follow-up period was 265 days (range, 31 to 752 days). Cumulative stent patency rates were 68.2% and 40.8% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. At the final follow-up, the rate of stent occlusion was 33.9% (20/59), and the median stent patency period was 276 days (range, 2 to 706 days). The clinical outcomes of DCMSs were comparable to the outcomes previously reported for CMSs with respect to stent patency period and complication rates.Background/Aims
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Keywords: Stents, Extrahepatic cholestasis, Feasibility studies, Common bile duct neoplasms, Adverse effects
Endoscopic biliary stenting is a well-established method that is considered the gold standard for the palliative treatment for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.1,2 The therapeutic effects of stent insertion are similar to those of surgical biliary drainage, but stent insertion is associated with a lower complication rate than the surgical procedure.3 Since 1979, plastic stents have been widely used to allow biliary drainage in cases of malignant biliary obstruction.3?5 However, stent failure due to clogging caused by protein in bile juice, bacterial growth, or biliary secretion frequently occurs after a short period of time. Therefore, stent replacement every 3 to 4 months is required to maintain adequate biliary drainage.5 Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are more expensive than plastic stents but remain patent for longer because of their larger diameters, which can be extended to 24?36 F. This results in a lower incidence of bacterial growth in the stent. However, SEMS failure usually occurs because of tissue hyperplasia or neoplastic tumor ingrowth through the stent mesh,6 and thus, covered self-expanding metal stent (CMS) with a membrane that prevents tissue ingrowth into the stent, were developed to overcome the drawbacks of SEMS. Nevertheless, although CMSs may increase stent patency related to tissue ingrowth, stent occlusion associated with bile sludge clogging or tumor overgrowth can occur.7,8 In addition, CMSs can cause complications associated with the stent-covering such as pancreatitis, cholecystitis, and stent migration.8,9 CMSs are also more likely to migrate due to a lack of tissue embedding.10,11
The biliary double-layered, covered metal stent (DCMS) was designed to reduce tissue ingrowth and stent covering-related complications. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the DCMS for the palliative treatment of malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction.
DCMSs were endoscopically placed to treat unresectable malignant common bile duct obstruction at four tertiary referral centers between October 2007 and November 2011. All patients treated were enrolled in the present study and followed up, and clinical courses were recorded at each center. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of all participating centers. The inclusion criteria were (1) age >18 years, (2) inoperable malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction, (3) no previous attempt of endoscopic biliary drainage, and (4) no history of biliary tract surgery. The exclusion criteria were (1) intrahepatic biliary obstruction and (2) inadequate medical records. The medical records of the patients were analyzed and the following information was extracted: clinical characteristics, stent dysfunction, stent-related complications, and clinical outcome.
The structure of the DCMS (S&G BioTech Inc., Seongnam, Korea) used is shown in Fig. 1. The stent consists of a silicone membrane sandwiched between two nitinol stents. Since the cell of a nitinol stent partially overlaps with the cell of another nitinol stent, each cell size of DCMS is small compared to that of other CMSs. This is expected to reduce the risk of tissue hyperplasia and tumor ingrowth. Furthermore, the DCMS contains a special structure to reduce axial forces of the stent, which can straighten stents or result in the proximal end of a stent being pushed against the bile duct wall during stent insertion. A specially weaved V-shaped wire provides the stent with a flexible structure. A usual nitinol stent consists of two wires that are twisted together. Its mesh construction tends to be easily shortened, and it has a strong axial force. Adding the V-shaped wire to the twisted structure may add to its ability to resist axial forces and increase the radial force, and thus, prevent stent shortening (Fig. 2).
All stents were inserted into bile ducts by experienced pancreaticobiliary endoscopists using a routine procedure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed before stent insertion. Technical and functional success rates and complications associated with stent placement were evaluated. Technical success was defined as the successful placement of a stent across a stricture. Functional success was defined as an improvement in bilirubin to less than 75% of the pretreatment value within a month of the procedure. Early and late complications were defined as those occurring at <30 days or >30 days after stent placement, respectively.
Patients visited hospital monthly to three months after stent placement to assess stent function, and were examined for symptoms and signs of biliary obstruction. Blood tests were performed at each visit. Computed tomography (CT) was performed to assess stent dysfunction when biliary obstruction was suspected. The primary study end point was stent dysfunction, which was defined as the presence of symptoms of biliary obstruction, that is, abdominal pain, dark urine, fever, jaundice, nausea and vomiting, acholic stools or an increased bilirubin level with an abnormal liver profile by blood testing and confirmation by cholangiography or CT. Tumor ingrowth was defined as growth of the tumor invading the body of the stent and occluding its lumen on cholangiography. Likewise, tumor overgrowth was defined as growth of the tumor proximal or distal to stent and leading the lumen occlusion with function loss. Stent patency period was defined as the time elapsed between placement and occlusion. When a stent remained patent until death, the patency period was measured from date of placement to death. The secondary end point was stent migration rate. Migration was defined as movement of the stent to a position where it was no longer satisfactorily bridging the stricture. Stent migration period was measured from the date of stent insertion to the date of stent migration detection. Patient survival was defined as time from diagnosis to death. When a patient was lost to follow-up or date of death was unascertained, survival period was calculated from diagnosis to date of last visit. Cumulative patient survival and stent patency were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and SPSS version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The stent patency and survival periods of patients who were lost to follow-up or died during the study period were censored.
Fifty-nine patients with malignant extrahepatic biliary stricture that underwent endoscopic biliary drainage with the DCMS between October 2007 and November 2011 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The etiologies of malignancies are summarized in Table 1. In all patients, malignancy was confirmed by histopathologic examination. Median age of the patients was 70 years (range, 43 to 87 years), and the male:female ratio was approximately 3:2 (36:23 cases). Median follow-up was 265 days (range, 31 to 752 days). Pancreatic cancer was the most common cause of malignant extrahepatic biliary stricture, and the distal CBD was most commonly affected (Table 2).
The DCMS was successfully deployed in all 59 cases, and technical and functional success rates were both 100%. Symptoms of biliary obstruction improved in all cases. Complications occurred in five patients (8.5%), and early complications in two of these five patients. Acute cholangitis occurred in one patient but responded to antibiotics without further complication. In one patient, stent migration was observed 2 days after placement, but after repositioning related symptoms and signs resolved. Asymptomatic hyperamylasemia occurred in two patients. Late complications occurred in three; stent migration in two patients and a liver abscess in one. These two late complications were cause by distal and proximal stent migration at 162 and 156 days, respectively, after placement. The distal migration resolved after replacement with a new DCMS, and the proximal migration was successfully treated by additional metal stent insertion without previous stent removal. The liver abscess was treated with antibiotics without additional biliary drainage (Table 3). Consequently, stent migration occurred in a total of three patients and all of them could be treated by stent repositioning or additional stent insertion. In this study, cholecystitis did not occur in any patients.
Median stent patency was 276 days (range, 2 to 706 days), and stent dysfunction was observed in 33.9% of cases (20/59). Cumulative stent patency rates were 68.2% at 6 months and 40.8% at 12 months after placement (Fig. 3). Causes of stent dysfunction were bile sludge (13/20, 65%), tumor ingrowth (4/20, 20%), and tumor overgrowth (3/20, 15%). Bile sludge was removed by mechanical cleaning with an extraction balloon catheter in seven patients, and in the other six patients additional biliary drainage was required to correct the stent dysfunction (a metal stent was used in four, a plastic stent in one, and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in one). Among 13 patients, stent clogging by biliary sludge occurred 2 days after stent insertion in one patient and the stent also could recover the patency by mechanical cleansing. Tumor ingrowth and overgrowth required additional metal or plastic stent insertions. For the 59 patients, overall stent dysfunction occurred at median periods of 158 days placement (Table 4). An analysis of time to stent dysfunction by cause showed that bile sludge (median days, 126) tended to occur faster than tissue ingrowth (189 days) or overgrowth (142 days).
Of the 59 patients, 56 were followed-up until death; median survival was 253 days (range, 15 to 752 days). Patient survival dropped rapidly during the early phase of follow-up (6-month cumulative survival rate, 58.9%), but then slowed (1-year cumulative survival rate, 26%) (Fig. 4). However, stent related death did not occur in this study. All stent dysfunctions were treated with endoscopic cleansing or additional biliary drainages.
The present study shows that DCMS placement is an effective palliative treatment for malignant biliary stricture; technical and functional success rates were both 100%.
The overall complication rate related to DCMS placement was 8.5%, which is similar to those reported by other studies on CMSs (Table 5). Pancreatitis has been reported to be more common in patients that have received a CMS,8 but the rate of pancreatitis was low in the present study. Furthermore, the incidence of stent migration was only 5% (three patients) even though DCMS does not have fixing equipment in the CBD, such as anchoring flap and flared end.12 We believe that the lower incidence of complications observed in this study is related to the V-shaped structure of the stent, which reduces axial forces applied to DCMSs.
Accordingly, DCMSs can be placed along the course of the bile duct because this reduction in axial force would tend to prevent stent migration and the incidence of complications related to stent insertion. Isayama
In the present study, the rate of DCMS dysfunction among the 59 study subjects was 33.9%, and sludge was the main cause of dysfunction (13/20). Despite the fact that the DCMS has special features to reduce stent dysfunction by sludge such as a polished inner layer to prevent sludge accumulation, the incidence of stent dysfunction caused by sludge formation remained high, which represents a limitation regarding the use of DCMSs to manage malignant biliary obstruction.
Tumor ingrowth was observed in four patients (6.8%) in the present study, which is similar or slightly lower than that found in other CMS studies.8,16,17 In fact, it has been reported that tumor ingrowth occurs in 8.8% to 16% of CMSs.13,15 The DCMS used in the present study was developed to suppress tumor ingrowth by increasing surface tension through a reduction in the cell size. The cells of DCMSs are 2 mm in diameter, whereas the cells of other CMSs are approximately 4 mm in diameter. In addition, a silicone membrane is placed between two layers of nitinol wires. In the present study, tissue ingrowth occurred in four patients after a mean period of 208 days, which could have been due to loss of silicone membrane integrity after nearly 7 months. However, the integrity of silicone membrane have not been studied in current study. Therefore, the futher study would be needed to verify the our hypothesis. In the present study, the median stent patency period was 276 days, which is similar or slightly longer than values reported in studies on CMSs (Table 5).8,10,11,15,18 However, the 6-month patency rate in the present study was 68.2%, which is lower than those of previous relevant series, which reported rates ranging from 78% to 93%.19 We believe that this result could be associated with stent dysfunction rates. Stent dysfunction occurred in 15 cases within 6 months, and subsequently, only five cases were reported during the 2-year follow-up. Stent dysfunction caused by bile sludge tended to occur earlier than those caused by other factors; in fact, most cases of stent dysfunction within the first 6 months were caused by bile sludge. Thus, longer DCMS patency would be expected if bile sludge accumulation could be inhibited in the stent lumen.
This study has several limitations that warrant consideration. First, the study is limited by its retrospective nature, and as a result, we were not able to enroll sufficient patients to precisely evaluate the efficacy of the stent. Second, the study has only a single arm, and thus, the DCMS could not be compared with other biliary stents.
In conclusion, the DCMS was found to have the ability to prevent tissue ingrowth and stent migration. In addition, its patency and complication rates were similar to those reported for CMSs. However, stent dysfunction caused by bile sludge occurred frequently, and this aspect of the DCMS requires further research effort to identify an effective solution.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
This work was supported by Inha University Hospital Research Grant.
Authors’ contributions: J.S.P. and S.J.: conception and design, collection and assembly of data, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article, provision of study materials, administrative, technical, and logistic support. D.H.L., J.H.M., and K.T.L.: collection and assembly of data and the provision of study materials or patients. S.H.D.: conception and design, collection and assembly of data, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, administrative aspects, and final approval of the article.
Types of Malignancy Causing Obstruction
?Type of malignancy? | ?No. (%)? |
---|---|
?Pancreatic | 35 (59.3) |
?Primary bile duct | 12 (20.3) |
?Gall bladder | 4 (6.8) |
?Ampullary | 4 (6.8) |
Other cancers | |
??Lung | 2 (3.4) |
??Stomach | 1 (1.7) |
??Unknown origin | 1 (1.7) |
?Total | 59 |
Location of Extrahepatic Obstructions
?Location of obstruction? | ?No. (%)? |
---|---|
?Distal common bile duct | 34 (57.6) |
?Mid common bile duct | 17 (28.8) |
?Proximal common bile duct | 8 (13.6) |
?Total | 59 |
Reasons for Stent Dysfunction and Stent-Associated Complications
?No. (%)? | |
---|---|
?Stent dysfunction | 20 (33.9) |
??Ingrowth | 4 |
??Overgrowth | 3 |
??Sludge | 13 |
?Complications | 5 (8.5) |
?Early complications | |
???Cholangitis | 1 |
???Migration | 1 |
?Delayed complications | |
???Liver abscess??? | 1 |
???Migration | 2 |
Stent Patency according to the Cause of Stent Obstruction
Reason | ?No.? | ?Mean stent patency (SD), day? | ?Median stent patency (range), day? |
---|---|---|---|
?Tumor ingrowth | 4?? | ?????208.5 (45.3) | ?????189 (180?276) |
?Tumor overgrowth? | 3?? | ?????201.0 (111.9) | ?????142 (131?330) |
?Sludge | 13?? | ?????133.5 (90.7) | ?????126 (2?210) |
?Total | ?20?? | ?????158.6 (89.9) | ?????149 |
Results of Trials Evaluating CMSs for the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Study | No. of patients | Type of stent | Survival, day | Patency, day | Total no. of complications (%) | Follow-up |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
?Kahaleh | 80 | ?Covered Wallstent | 177† | 171† | 7 (8.7) | 3 mo* |
?Nakai | 69 | ?Covered Wallstent | 200† | 139† | 9 (13) | 2 yr† |
?Isayama | 47 | ?Covered ComVi | 255† | 208† | 2 (4.2) | NA |
?Telford | 68 | ?Covered Wallstent | 227* | 357* | 19 (27) | 201 day* |
?Perri | 70 | ?Covered ComVi | 190* | 154* | 5 (7.1) | 12 mo* |
?Present study | 59 | ?Biliary double-layered and membrane covered stent | 253* | 276* | 5 (8.5) | 265 day* |
NA, not assessable.
†Values are expressed as means.
Gut and Liver 2016; 10(6): 969-974
Published online November 15, 2016 https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl15112
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
Jin-Seok Park1, Seok Jeong1,2, Don Haeng Lee1,2,3, Jong Ho Moon4, Kyu Taek Lee5, Seok Ho Dong6
1Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea, 2The National Center of Efficacy Evaluation for the Development of Health Products Targeting Digestive Disorders (NCEED), Incheon, Korea, 3Utah-Inha DDS & Advanced Therapeutics Research Center, Incheon, Korea, 4Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea, 5Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, 6Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to: Seok Ho Dong, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea, Tel: +82-2-958-8200, Fax: +82-2-968-1848, E-mail: gidrdong@hanmail.net
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The covered self-expandable metal stent (CMS) was developed to prevent tumor ingrowth-induced stent occlusion during the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. However, complications such as cholecystitis, pancreatitis, and stent migration can occur after the endoscopic insertion of CMSs. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a double-layered CMS (DCMS) for the management of malignant bile duct obstruction. DCMSs were endoscopically introduced into 59 patients with unresectable malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction at four tertiary referral centers, and the patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Both the technical and functional success rates were 100%. Procedure-related complications including pancreatitis, cholangitis, stent migration, and liver abscess occurred in five patients (8.5%). The median follow-up period was 265 days (range, 31 to 752 days). Cumulative stent patency rates were 68.2% and 40.8% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. At the final follow-up, the rate of stent occlusion was 33.9% (20/59), and the median stent patency period was 276 days (range, 2 to 706 days). The clinical outcomes of DCMSs were comparable to the outcomes previously reported for CMSs with respect to stent patency period and complication rates.Background/Aims
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Keywords: Stents, Extrahepatic cholestasis, Feasibility studies, Common bile duct neoplasms, Adverse effects
Endoscopic biliary stenting is a well-established method that is considered the gold standard for the palliative treatment for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.1,2 The therapeutic effects of stent insertion are similar to those of surgical biliary drainage, but stent insertion is associated with a lower complication rate than the surgical procedure.3 Since 1979, plastic stents have been widely used to allow biliary drainage in cases of malignant biliary obstruction.3?5 However, stent failure due to clogging caused by protein in bile juice, bacterial growth, or biliary secretion frequently occurs after a short period of time. Therefore, stent replacement every 3 to 4 months is required to maintain adequate biliary drainage.5 Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are more expensive than plastic stents but remain patent for longer because of their larger diameters, which can be extended to 24?36 F. This results in a lower incidence of bacterial growth in the stent. However, SEMS failure usually occurs because of tissue hyperplasia or neoplastic tumor ingrowth through the stent mesh,6 and thus, covered self-expanding metal stent (CMS) with a membrane that prevents tissue ingrowth into the stent, were developed to overcome the drawbacks of SEMS. Nevertheless, although CMSs may increase stent patency related to tissue ingrowth, stent occlusion associated with bile sludge clogging or tumor overgrowth can occur.7,8 In addition, CMSs can cause complications associated with the stent-covering such as pancreatitis, cholecystitis, and stent migration.8,9 CMSs are also more likely to migrate due to a lack of tissue embedding.10,11
The biliary double-layered, covered metal stent (DCMS) was designed to reduce tissue ingrowth and stent covering-related complications. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the DCMS for the palliative treatment of malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction.
DCMSs were endoscopically placed to treat unresectable malignant common bile duct obstruction at four tertiary referral centers between October 2007 and November 2011. All patients treated were enrolled in the present study and followed up, and clinical courses were recorded at each center. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of all participating centers. The inclusion criteria were (1) age >18 years, (2) inoperable malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction, (3) no previous attempt of endoscopic biliary drainage, and (4) no history of biliary tract surgery. The exclusion criteria were (1) intrahepatic biliary obstruction and (2) inadequate medical records. The medical records of the patients were analyzed and the following information was extracted: clinical characteristics, stent dysfunction, stent-related complications, and clinical outcome.
The structure of the DCMS (S&G BioTech Inc., Seongnam, Korea) used is shown in Fig. 1. The stent consists of a silicone membrane sandwiched between two nitinol stents. Since the cell of a nitinol stent partially overlaps with the cell of another nitinol stent, each cell size of DCMS is small compared to that of other CMSs. This is expected to reduce the risk of tissue hyperplasia and tumor ingrowth. Furthermore, the DCMS contains a special structure to reduce axial forces of the stent, which can straighten stents or result in the proximal end of a stent being pushed against the bile duct wall during stent insertion. A specially weaved V-shaped wire provides the stent with a flexible structure. A usual nitinol stent consists of two wires that are twisted together. Its mesh construction tends to be easily shortened, and it has a strong axial force. Adding the V-shaped wire to the twisted structure may add to its ability to resist axial forces and increase the radial force, and thus, prevent stent shortening (Fig. 2).
All stents were inserted into bile ducts by experienced pancreaticobiliary endoscopists using a routine procedure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed before stent insertion. Technical and functional success rates and complications associated with stent placement were evaluated. Technical success was defined as the successful placement of a stent across a stricture. Functional success was defined as an improvement in bilirubin to less than 75% of the pretreatment value within a month of the procedure. Early and late complications were defined as those occurring at <30 days or >30 days after stent placement, respectively.
Patients visited hospital monthly to three months after stent placement to assess stent function, and were examined for symptoms and signs of biliary obstruction. Blood tests were performed at each visit. Computed tomography (CT) was performed to assess stent dysfunction when biliary obstruction was suspected. The primary study end point was stent dysfunction, which was defined as the presence of symptoms of biliary obstruction, that is, abdominal pain, dark urine, fever, jaundice, nausea and vomiting, acholic stools or an increased bilirubin level with an abnormal liver profile by blood testing and confirmation by cholangiography or CT. Tumor ingrowth was defined as growth of the tumor invading the body of the stent and occluding its lumen on cholangiography. Likewise, tumor overgrowth was defined as growth of the tumor proximal or distal to stent and leading the lumen occlusion with function loss. Stent patency period was defined as the time elapsed between placement and occlusion. When a stent remained patent until death, the patency period was measured from date of placement to death. The secondary end point was stent migration rate. Migration was defined as movement of the stent to a position where it was no longer satisfactorily bridging the stricture. Stent migration period was measured from the date of stent insertion to the date of stent migration detection. Patient survival was defined as time from diagnosis to death. When a patient was lost to follow-up or date of death was unascertained, survival period was calculated from diagnosis to date of last visit. Cumulative patient survival and stent patency were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and SPSS version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The stent patency and survival periods of patients who were lost to follow-up or died during the study period were censored.
Fifty-nine patients with malignant extrahepatic biliary stricture that underwent endoscopic biliary drainage with the DCMS between October 2007 and November 2011 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The etiologies of malignancies are summarized in Table 1. In all patients, malignancy was confirmed by histopathologic examination. Median age of the patients was 70 years (range, 43 to 87 years), and the male:female ratio was approximately 3:2 (36:23 cases). Median follow-up was 265 days (range, 31 to 752 days). Pancreatic cancer was the most common cause of malignant extrahepatic biliary stricture, and the distal CBD was most commonly affected (Table 2).
The DCMS was successfully deployed in all 59 cases, and technical and functional success rates were both 100%. Symptoms of biliary obstruction improved in all cases. Complications occurred in five patients (8.5%), and early complications in two of these five patients. Acute cholangitis occurred in one patient but responded to antibiotics without further complication. In one patient, stent migration was observed 2 days after placement, but after repositioning related symptoms and signs resolved. Asymptomatic hyperamylasemia occurred in two patients. Late complications occurred in three; stent migration in two patients and a liver abscess in one. These two late complications were cause by distal and proximal stent migration at 162 and 156 days, respectively, after placement. The distal migration resolved after replacement with a new DCMS, and the proximal migration was successfully treated by additional metal stent insertion without previous stent removal. The liver abscess was treated with antibiotics without additional biliary drainage (Table 3). Consequently, stent migration occurred in a total of three patients and all of them could be treated by stent repositioning or additional stent insertion. In this study, cholecystitis did not occur in any patients.
Median stent patency was 276 days (range, 2 to 706 days), and stent dysfunction was observed in 33.9% of cases (20/59). Cumulative stent patency rates were 68.2% at 6 months and 40.8% at 12 months after placement (Fig. 3). Causes of stent dysfunction were bile sludge (13/20, 65%), tumor ingrowth (4/20, 20%), and tumor overgrowth (3/20, 15%). Bile sludge was removed by mechanical cleaning with an extraction balloon catheter in seven patients, and in the other six patients additional biliary drainage was required to correct the stent dysfunction (a metal stent was used in four, a plastic stent in one, and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in one). Among 13 patients, stent clogging by biliary sludge occurred 2 days after stent insertion in one patient and the stent also could recover the patency by mechanical cleansing. Tumor ingrowth and overgrowth required additional metal or plastic stent insertions. For the 59 patients, overall stent dysfunction occurred at median periods of 158 days placement (Table 4). An analysis of time to stent dysfunction by cause showed that bile sludge (median days, 126) tended to occur faster than tissue ingrowth (189 days) or overgrowth (142 days).
Of the 59 patients, 56 were followed-up until death; median survival was 253 days (range, 15 to 752 days). Patient survival dropped rapidly during the early phase of follow-up (6-month cumulative survival rate, 58.9%), but then slowed (1-year cumulative survival rate, 26%) (Fig. 4). However, stent related death did not occur in this study. All stent dysfunctions were treated with endoscopic cleansing or additional biliary drainages.
The present study shows that DCMS placement is an effective palliative treatment for malignant biliary stricture; technical and functional success rates were both 100%.
The overall complication rate related to DCMS placement was 8.5%, which is similar to those reported by other studies on CMSs (Table 5). Pancreatitis has been reported to be more common in patients that have received a CMS,8 but the rate of pancreatitis was low in the present study. Furthermore, the incidence of stent migration was only 5% (three patients) even though DCMS does not have fixing equipment in the CBD, such as anchoring flap and flared end.12 We believe that the lower incidence of complications observed in this study is related to the V-shaped structure of the stent, which reduces axial forces applied to DCMSs.
Accordingly, DCMSs can be placed along the course of the bile duct because this reduction in axial force would tend to prevent stent migration and the incidence of complications related to stent insertion. Isayama
In the present study, the rate of DCMS dysfunction among the 59 study subjects was 33.9%, and sludge was the main cause of dysfunction (13/20). Despite the fact that the DCMS has special features to reduce stent dysfunction by sludge such as a polished inner layer to prevent sludge accumulation, the incidence of stent dysfunction caused by sludge formation remained high, which represents a limitation regarding the use of DCMSs to manage malignant biliary obstruction.
Tumor ingrowth was observed in four patients (6.8%) in the present study, which is similar or slightly lower than that found in other CMS studies.8,16,17 In fact, it has been reported that tumor ingrowth occurs in 8.8% to 16% of CMSs.13,15 The DCMS used in the present study was developed to suppress tumor ingrowth by increasing surface tension through a reduction in the cell size. The cells of DCMSs are 2 mm in diameter, whereas the cells of other CMSs are approximately 4 mm in diameter. In addition, a silicone membrane is placed between two layers of nitinol wires. In the present study, tissue ingrowth occurred in four patients after a mean period of 208 days, which could have been due to loss of silicone membrane integrity after nearly 7 months. However, the integrity of silicone membrane have not been studied in current study. Therefore, the futher study would be needed to verify the our hypothesis. In the present study, the median stent patency period was 276 days, which is similar or slightly longer than values reported in studies on CMSs (Table 5).8,10,11,15,18 However, the 6-month patency rate in the present study was 68.2%, which is lower than those of previous relevant series, which reported rates ranging from 78% to 93%.19 We believe that this result could be associated with stent dysfunction rates. Stent dysfunction occurred in 15 cases within 6 months, and subsequently, only five cases were reported during the 2-year follow-up. Stent dysfunction caused by bile sludge tended to occur earlier than those caused by other factors; in fact, most cases of stent dysfunction within the first 6 months were caused by bile sludge. Thus, longer DCMS patency would be expected if bile sludge accumulation could be inhibited in the stent lumen.
This study has several limitations that warrant consideration. First, the study is limited by its retrospective nature, and as a result, we were not able to enroll sufficient patients to precisely evaluate the efficacy of the stent. Second, the study has only a single arm, and thus, the DCMS could not be compared with other biliary stents.
In conclusion, the DCMS was found to have the ability to prevent tissue ingrowth and stent migration. In addition, its patency and complication rates were similar to those reported for CMSs. However, stent dysfunction caused by bile sludge occurred frequently, and this aspect of the DCMS requires further research effort to identify an effective solution.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
This work was supported by Inha University Hospital Research Grant.
Authors’ contributions: J.S.P. and S.J.: conception and design, collection and assembly of data, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article, provision of study materials, administrative, technical, and logistic support. D.H.L., J.H.M., and K.T.L.: collection and assembly of data and the provision of study materials or patients. S.H.D.: conception and design, collection and assembly of data, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, administrative aspects, and final approval of the article.
Table 1 Types of Malignancy Causing Obstruction
?Type of malignancy? | ?No. (%)? |
---|---|
?Pancreatic | 35 (59.3) |
?Primary bile duct | 12 (20.3) |
?Gall bladder | 4 (6.8) |
?Ampullary | 4 (6.8) |
Other cancers | |
??Lung | 2 (3.4) |
??Stomach | 1 (1.7) |
??Unknown origin | 1 (1.7) |
?Total | 59 |
Table 2 Location of Extrahepatic Obstructions
?Location of obstruction? | ?No. (%)? |
---|---|
?Distal common bile duct | 34 (57.6) |
?Mid common bile duct | 17 (28.8) |
?Proximal common bile duct | 8 (13.6) |
?Total | 59 |
Table 3 Reasons for Stent Dysfunction and Stent-Associated Complications
?No. (%)? | |
---|---|
?Stent dysfunction | 20 (33.9) |
??Ingrowth | 4 |
??Overgrowth | 3 |
??Sludge | 13 |
?Complications | 5 (8.5) |
?Early complications | |
???Cholangitis | 1 |
???Migration | 1 |
?Delayed complications | |
???Liver abscess??? | 1 |
???Migration | 2 |
Table 4 Stent Patency according to the Cause of Stent Obstruction
Reason | ?No.? | ?Mean stent patency (SD), day? | ?Median stent patency (range), day? |
---|---|---|---|
?Tumor ingrowth | 4?? | ?????208.5 (45.3) | ?????189 (180?276) |
?Tumor overgrowth? | 3?? | ?????201.0 (111.9) | ?????142 (131?330) |
?Sludge | 13?? | ?????133.5 (90.7) | ?????126 (2?210) |
?Total | ?20?? | ?????158.6 (89.9) | ?????149 |
Table 5 Results of Trials Evaluating CMSs for the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Study | No. of patients | Type of stent | Survival, day | Patency, day | Total no. of complications (%) | Follow-up |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
?Kahaleh | 80 | ?Covered Wallstent | 177† | 171† | 7 (8.7) | 3 mo* |
?Nakai | 69 | ?Covered Wallstent | 200† | 139† | 9 (13) | 2 yr† |
?Isayama | 47 | ?Covered ComVi | 255† | 208† | 2 (4.2) | NA |
?Telford | 68 | ?Covered Wallstent | 227* | 357* | 19 (27) | 201 day* |
?Perri | 70 | ?Covered ComVi | 190* | 154* | 5 (7.1) | 12 mo* |
?Present study | 59 | ?Biliary double-layered and membrane covered stent | 253* | 276* | 5 (8.5) | 265 day* |
NA, not assessable.
†Values are expressed as means.