Article Search
검색
검색 팝업 닫기

Metrics

Help

  • 1. Aims and Scope

    Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut atnd Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. +MORE

  • 2. Editorial Board

    Editor-in-Chief + MORE

    Editor-in-Chief
    Yong Chan Lee Professor of Medicine
    Director, Gastrointestinal Research Laboratory
    Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Univ. California San Francisco
    San Francisco, USA

    Deputy Editor

    Deputy Editor
    Jong Pil Im Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
    Robert S. Bresalier University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
    Steven H. Itzkowitz Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY, USA
  • 3. Editorial Office
  • 4. Articles
  • 5. Instructions for Authors
  • 6. File Download (PDF version)
  • 7. Ethical Standards
  • 8. Peer Review

    All papers submitted to Gut and Liver are reviewed by the editorial team before being sent out for an external peer review to rule out papers that have low priority, insufficient originality, scientific flaws, or the absence of a message of importance to the readers of the Journal. A decision about these papers will usually be made within two or three weeks.
    The remaining articles are usually sent to two reviewers. It would be very helpful if you could suggest a selection of reviewers and include their contact details. We may not always use the reviewers you recommend, but suggesting reviewers will make our reviewer database much richer; in the end, everyone will benefit. We reserve the right to return manuscripts in which no reviewers are suggested.

    The final responsibility for the decision to accept or reject lies with the editors. In many cases, papers may be rejected despite favorable reviews because of editorial policy or a lack of space. The editor retains the right to determine publication priorities, the style of the paper, and to request, if necessary, that the material submitted be shortened for publication.

Search

Search

Year

to

Article Type

Review Article

Split Viewer

Investigating Human Liver Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells from the Perspectives of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists

Ji Won Han1,2 , Eui-Cheol Shin3,4

1The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea; 3Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea; 4The Center for Viral Immunology, Korea Virus Research Institute, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon, Korea

Correspondence to: Ji Won Han
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-1450
E-mail tmznjf@catholic.ac.kr.

Eui-Cheol Shin
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-9503
E-mail ecshin@kaist.ac.kr.

Received: August 17, 2024; Revised: September 18, 2024; Accepted: September 22, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Gut Liver 2025;19(2):161-170. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl240366

Published online March 10, 2025, Published date March 15, 2025

Copyright © Gut and Liver.

Liver tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells play a pivotal role in hepatic immune responses. Their unique residence within liver sinusoids allow continuous antigen surveillance. In this review, we highlight the role of liver TRM cells in protective immunity and disease pathology. Comparisons between human and murine liver TRM cells reveal species-specific characteristics, suggesting the need for human-focused studies. One key finding is the involvement of liver TRM cells in viral hepatitis, where they can both control infection and contribute to liver damage. Liver TRM cells also exhibit dual roles in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease, promoting inflammation and fibrosis while also contributing to fibrosis resolution. In autoimmune liver diseases, such as autoimmune hepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, the presence of liver TRM cells correlates with disease severity. In this review, we underscore the importance of liver TRM cells in vaccine development, particularly vaccines against malaria. Future research should focus on the mechanisms governing TRM-cell formation, maintenance, and function, with the aim of supporting their protective roles while mitigating detrimental effects. Advancing our understanding of liver TRM cells will enhance our knowledge of liver immunology and inform novel therapeutic strategies for liver disease management.

Keywords: T-lymphocytes, Tissue resident T cell, Liver diseases

Most immune cells, including over 95% of T cells, reside and function in tissues rather than in blood.1 These tissues include lymphoid organs (e.g., bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes) and barrier surfaces (e.g., the skin, gut, and mucous membranes). Key populations of tissue-resident immune cells include tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and innate lymphoid cells, which are crucial for local immune responses.2 T cells constitute an adaptive immune cell population that plays a central role in immune defense. Notably, CD8+ T cells eliminate infected, damaged, or tumor cells, while CD4+ T cells facilitate and regulate immune responses. The most important feature of the adaptive immune system is the formation of memory T cells, which enable a rapid and effective response upon re-exposure to pathogens. TRM cells might serve this role immediately at the entry sites of various pathogens.3

The liver is a vital immunological organ, buffering gut contents and systemic circulation. About 80% of the liver’s blood supply comes from the gut via the portal vein. This blood is rich in dietary and microbial antigens, which must be processed by the liver as it performs immunosurveillance.4 Additionally, the liver has a distinctive anatomical vascular system, which allows continuous connection between immune cells, liver sinusoid endothelial cells (LSEC), and hepatocytes. Notably, its low-pressure blood flow and fenestrated endothelium facilitate interactions between immune cells and hepatic cells.5 The liver sinusoids and the space of Disse are populated by immune cells that maintain organ homeostasis and regulate inflammation. These cells adapt to this unique environment, adopting unique characteristics compared to the circulating population. For example, liver CD8+ TRM cells exhibit special characteristics compared to circulating T cells, and play crucial roles in liver immunity, participating in both the initiation and resolution of intrahepatic inflammation. Dysregulation of TRM cells is implicated in the pathogenesis of various liver diseases.6

In this review, we aim to provide valuable summaries for clinicians, such as gastroenterologists and hepatologists conducting clinical and translational research. We review the general features of CD8+ TRM cells, with specific focus on the characteristics of liver TRM cells. We will also compare liver TRM cells between humans and mice, which supports the necessity of investigating this population using human samples. Finally, we will summarize the clinical implications of the present knowledge of liver TRM cells in human liver diseases.

1. Phenotypic and transcriptional characteristics of TRM cells

The term TRM cells generally refers to conventional CD8+ memory (not naïve) T cells with αβ T cell receptor characterized by the expression of CD69 and/or CD103, which are not expressed in circulating T cells.7 CD69 and CD103 help TRM cells reside in peripheral tissues, such as the epithelium, through interaction with molecules like E-cadherin and by inhibiting KLF2 and S1PR1, which facilitate egress from peripheral organs.8 TRM cells also generally express CD49a and CXCR6,9 and lack markers typically found in central homing memory T cells, such as CCR7 and CD62L.10 One key transcription factor is Runx3, which is crucial for TRM-cell differentiation.11 Additionally, Hobit and Blimp are involved in driving TRM-cell differentiation, and have been described as important transcriptional regulators.12 Epigenetic modifications, like DNA methylation and histone acetylation, might also regulate TRM-cell development and function. DNA methylation is reduced in key genes such as PRF1, CD39, and CD103, while histone acetylation support expressions of these genes in TRM cells.13,14 These findings indicate that TRM cells have distinct phenotypic characteristics compared to circulating T cells (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.Schematic representation of circulating memory T cells and tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells. Circulating memory T cells lack CD69 and CD103; recirculate between the blood and secondary lymphoid organs. TRM cells express CD69 and variably express CD103, CD49a, and CXCR6, enabling their retention in tissues, which is regulated by the downregulation of KLF2 and S1PR1. CXCR6, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 6; KLF2, Krüppel-like factor 2; S1PR1, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1.

2. Generation and maintenance of TRM cells

Multiple exposures to antigens can generate large pools of TRM cells without altering the pre-existing T-cell pool, suggesting that antigen stimulation plays an important role in TRM-cell generation.15 Some reports indicate that antigen stimulation is also required to maintain this population.16 Additionally, cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-15 have been considered critical for TRM-cell differentiation and survival, through mechanisms involving mTOR signaling pathways.17-20 Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β is also involved in converting circulating effector T cells into TRM cells by enhancing the expressions of key surface receptors and transcription factors required for tissue residency.17,21 Moreover, IL-33 can promote TRM-cell survival and activation through the ST2 receptor.22 Hypoxia might also be linked to TRM-cell generation and maintenance.15 Although several mechanisms reportedly support TRM-cell maintenance, little is known about the longevity of human TRM cells. Notably, studies in mice and rhesus macaques demonstrate that TRM cells are stable for 300 to 700 days,23,24 suggesting that they are capable of long-term stable survival.

3. Functional characteristics of TRM cells

TRM cells are located in various tissues—including the skin, lungs, salivary glands, intestines, and other mucosal sites—and can exist in both lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues.25 They are essential for conferring local immune protection against infections, and rapidly respond to pathogens without requiring recruitment from the bloodstream, thereby serving as an immediate defense line.25 Upon encountering pathogens, TRM cells can proliferate and secrete effector cytokines, such as interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), which control infections and recruit other immune cells to the infection site.26,27 TRM cells also contain cytotoxic molecules that can directly kill target cells.28 In particular, TRM cells play a significant role in defense against viral infections. For instance, influenza-specific TRM cells in the lungs provide long-term protection by swiftly responding to re-infection and mounting a robust immune response.29 TRM cells also participate in defenses against bacterial and fungal infections. They can recognize and respond to these pathogens, ensuring rapid clearance and preventing widespread infection.30 Importantly, TRM cells adapt to the specific tissue environments they inhabit. For instance, lung TRM cells are particularly adept at responding to respiratory pathogens, while skin TRM cells are suited to handling cutaneous infections.31,32 TRM cells also significantly contribute to tumor surveillance and control. Higher TRM-cell frequencies in tumors correlate with better patient outcomes, because these cells can produce effector cytokines and directly lyse tumor cells in various cancer types.33 TRM cells might also play a fundamental role in surveilling subclinical tumors and thereby maintaining cancer–immune equilibrium. A previous study in a mouse model demonstrated that TRM cells within the epidermal layer of skin promoted a durable melanoma–immune equilibrium.34 Skin TRM cells played a crucial role in melanoma suppression, as evidenced by the findings that TRM-cell generation was correlated with macroscopic tumor-free status, while TRM-cell depletion led to tumor growth.

Although protective against infections, TRM cells can also contribute to the pathology of autoimmune diseases. In conditions like psoriasis and vitiligo, TRM cells drive inflammation and tissue damage through pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion.27,35-37 The persistence of TRM cells in affected tissues can promote chronic inflammation, exacerbating autoimmune conditions. Understanding these dual roles will help us to develop therapies that target pathogenic TRM cells while preserving their protective functions. Notably, after organ transplantation, donor-derived TRM cells can persist in grafts, and may either promote graft acceptance or contribute to rejection, depending on interactions between donor and recipient immune cells.38,39 These findings suggest that TRM cells might play dual roles in tissue protection and damage, which may vary depending on the clinical situation. In the following sections, we will review unique characteristics of liver TRM cells, and their clinical relevance in various liver diseases.

Fig. 2 presents the compositions of the mononuclear cell populations of the liver and peripheral blood, as we demonstrated in a study using liver perfusate.40 Importantly, the liver exhibits higher proportions of natural killer cells, mucosal-associated invariant T cells, and CD8+ T cells, whereas the peripheral blood shows a higher proportion of CD4+ T cells, suggesting that the liver constitutes a unique immune environment. CD69+CD8+ liver TRM cells comprise 20% to 80% of liver CD8+ T cells.40 Below we will summarize the unique characteristics of liver TRM cells.

Figure 2.Comparison of the mononuclear cell populations in peripheral blood and liver sinusoidal perfusates. Pie charts indicate the proportions of different immune cell subsets in peripheral blood (A) and liver sinusoidal perfusate (B), as measured by flow cytometry. MAIT, mucosal-associated invariant T cells; NK, natural killer cells.

1. Location of liver TRM cells

In most organs, TRM cells reside within epithelial tissues or parenchyma; however, liver TRM cells are mainly located within the sinusoids and constantly patrol the hepatic vasculature. The liver receives blood from both arterial and venous circulations, and the portal vein transports a significant volume of blood to the liver from the gastrointestinal tract and spleen. Upon reaching the liver, blood travels through narrow vascular capillaries called liver sinusoids, which slow the flow rate, enabling resident cells to interact with a wide range of antigens and circulating cells.4 The liver sinusoids are lined with a thin fenestrated layer of LSECs that separates hepatocytes from circulating cells. The fenestrae allow T cells in the blood to directly access the surface of hepatocytes or tissue stroma, facilitating antigen recognition and effector functions.41,42 In summary, liver TRM cells are located within the sinusoids and are continuously exposed to the bloodstream, which may affect their unique phenotypes and functions, compared to TRM cells in other tissues that are anatomically isolated from the circulation.43 Interestingly, intravital imaging has directly shown that liver TRM cells have an amoeboid shape and are uniquely positioned in the vasculature, where they patrol the liver sinusoids at faster migration speeds compared to skin TRM cells.43-45

2. Formation of liver TRM cells

During an immune response, local antigen presentation and inflammation significantly impact TRM-cell differentiation and seeding within tissues.43,46 However, the liver's vasculature ensures that circulating TRM-cell precursors have direct access to liver TRM-cell niches without having to leave the bloodstream. Therefore, TRM cells are formed by local CD8+ T-cell proliferation, but can also be induced by adhesion molecules or chemokines. The retention of circulating T cells within liver sinusoids is initially facilitated by their docking to platelets, which adhere to sinusoidal hyaluronan in a CD44-dependent manner. Next, these T cells migrate along the liver sinusoids and recognize hepatocellular antigens, which can induce liver TRM-cell differentiation.41 Another study reported that T cells may become trapped within liver sinusoids by LSECs, Kupffer cells, and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), which promote increased expression of adhesion molecules, such as ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and VAP-1.47 As T cells become trapped and migrate within the sinusoids, they interact with other cell types in the liver, which provide TRM-inducing factors. Interactions with integrins, as well as chemokine receptors and their ligands, are crucial for liver TRM cells. For example, CXCR6-CXCL16 interaction is essential for liver TRM-cell retention, as is the interaction between LFA-1 and ICAM-1.43,46,4

3. A unique functional characteristic of liver TRM cells

The liver is well-known as an immune-tolerant organ, and this concept can also be applied to liver T-cell responses. Before the concept of TRM cells emerged, investigations focused on liver T-cell characteristics, particularly their trapping, activation, and tolerance mechanisms. One early study provides a concise overview of liver T-cell responses, noting that activated T cells were trapped in the liver and subsequently underwent apoptosis, indicating that the liver not only accumulates T cells but can also promote their tolerance.49

Under normal conditions, various gut-derived substances enter the liver through the portal vein, and the hepatic microenvironment influences liver T cells to become tolerant. To limit liver T-cell responses, HSCs express programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which triggers T-cell apoptosis.50 Furthermore, antigen presentation by LSECs can induce antigen-specific T-cell tolerance via PD-1/PD-L1 interaction.51 Mouse HSCs can disrupt CD8+ T cells in an ICAM-1-dependent manner, thereby preventing their activation by antigen-presenting cells, and leading to apoptosis.47 Hepatocytes can also prime CD8+ T cells, but they induce clonal T-cell deletion through a Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death-dependent pathway.52

A recent study clearly demonstrated the role of LSECs in restricting liver TRM-cell activation and function in a pre-clinical model of hepatitis B virus (HBV).53 HBV-specific liver TRM cells exhibited reduced function, which was induced by the adenylyl cyclase–cAMP–PKA axis and related to close contact with LSECs, suggesting that LSECs play a direct role in T-cell tolerance. Overall, these interactions between liver T cells and other cell populations contribute to the regulation of tolerance, which may differ among various clinical situations.

4. Comparisons between human and murine liver TRM cells

Human and murine liver TRM cells share several core characteristics. Firstly, they both exhibit upregulation of CD69, a representative marker of TRM cells. This might reflect common mechanisms for retaining these cells within the liver sinusoids, and facilitating their interaction with antigens.43,54 CXCR6 is also highly expressed in liver TRM cells from both species. This chemokine receptor plays critical roles in the adhesion, accumulation, and maintenance of intrahepatic T cells. CXCL16, the ligand for CXCR6, is expressed by LSECs, Kupffer cells, and hepatocytes, which facilitates the residency of liver TRM cells.40,55,56 Moreover, in both humans and mice, liver TRM cells are essential for mounting protective immune responses by producing cytokines (e.g., IFN-γ and TNF) and expressing cytotoxic molecules (e.g., granzyme B), although the expression levels may vary.40,43 Additionally, both human and murine liver TRM cells are critically influenced by IL-15, which is crucial for their development, maintenance, and homeostatic proliferation.40,56,57

However, there are notable differences between human and murine liver TRM cells, reflecting species-specific adaptations and functions. One striking difference is that murine liver TRM cells do not express CD103, which is typically found in TRM cells from other tissues, and is expressed by a subset of human liver TRM cells (approximately 12.4%), indicating a species-specific divergence in the phenotypic characteristics of liver TRM cells.40,43,45,56 Among human liver TRM cells, CD103+ cells produce more IFN-γ and IL-2 upon stimulation and express higher perforin levels, while CD103 cells (although more numerous) show less cytokine production per cell and higher PD-1 expression.40 The expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-2α in human CD103 TRM cells suggests unique regulatory mechanisms driven by the liver’s hypoxic environment, which has not been prominently reported in murine studies.40,58 These differences highlight the importance of human-specific studies to fully understand human liver TRM cells, and their implications for liver diseases and therapies.

Previous studies demonstrate that liver TRM cells have special characteristics within the liver immune environment. In particular, their tolerant nature might play different roles in various liver diseases. Table 1 presents direct evidence regarding the liver TRM population and its clinical relevance in human liver diseases. In the following sections, we will summarize the clinical and experimental studies of this topic, which reveal the dual roles of liver TRM cells.

Table 1. Human Studies of Liver TRM Cells and their Clinical Correlations in Various Liver Diseases

AuthorDiseasesTRM phenotypeClinical correlations from human subjectsProtective/pathologic
Pallett et al.56HBVCD69+CD103+CD8+TRM↑ → HBV viral load ↓Protective
Koda et al.66MASLDCD69+CD8+TRM↑ → Fibrosis↓Protective
Nkongolo et al.61HBVCXCR6+CD8+Resolution of hepatitis → TRMPathologic
Kefalakes et al.63HDVCD69+CXCR6+CD8+NKG2D↑ on TRM → Liver enzymes and APRI↑Pathologic
Dudek et al.65MASLDCXCR6+CD8+TRM↑ → ALT↑Pathologic
You et al.67AIHCD69+CD103+CD8+TRM↑ → ALT, histologic inflammation/fibrosis↑Pathologic
Huang et al.70PBCCD103+CD8+TRM↑ → ALP, GGT, TB↑, histologic inflammation/fibrosis↑Pathologic
Kim et al.40LCCD69+CD103CD8+TRM activation↑ → MELD, Child-Pugh score↑Pathologic

TRM, tissue-resident memory T cells; HBV, hepatitis B virus; MASLD, metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease; HDV, hepatitis D virus; NKG2D, natural killer group 2D; APRI, aspartate transaminase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; PBC, primary biliary cholangitis; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; TB, total bilirubin; LC, liver cirrhosis; MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease.



1. Viral hepatitis

T-cell responses are critical determinants of the clinical outcome of chronic HBV infection, and studies have also investigated liver TRM cells’ roles and relationship with clinical outcomes. Murine models have provided clues indicating that liver TRM cells are a potential target for treating chronic HBV infection. Interestingly, hepatic priming of intrahepatic CD8+ T cells induces dysfunctional responses, which can be restored by IL-2 treatment but not by anti-PD-L1 blockade.59 Another study highlighted that the CXCL13-mediated accumulation of intrahepatic CXCR5+CD8+ T cells was correlated with decreased HBsAg levels, suggesting that liver TRM cells may play a positive role in controlling HBV infection.60

Studies have also characterized the protective role of human liver HBV-specific CD8+ TRM cells in patients with chronic HBV infection.56 Over 80% of liver HBV-specific CD8+ T cells express CD69, and the CD69+CD103+CD8+ subpopulation inversely correlates with HBV viral load, indicating a potential role in HBV control. This subpopulation also produces high IL-2 levels upon HBV-peptide stimulation, which may enhance HBV-specific T-cell responses. On the other hand, compared to CD103+ cells, our previous study demonstrated that CD69+CD103CD8+ TRM cells produce lower cytokine levels per cell upon HBV-peptide stimulation, although we did not investigate any direct correlations between clinical parameters.40 Since the majority of human liver TRM cells exhibit the CD103 phenotype, understanding the hypofunction mechanisms and enhancing the function of CD69+CD103CD8+ TRM cells could be pivotal for HBV control.

The pathological roles of liver TRM cells during HBV infection also warrant attention. A recent study identified highly activated liver CD8+ TRM cells that were associated with liver damage in chronic hepatitis B patients.61 Upon in vitro stimulation with IL-2 and IL-12, these cells lysed target cells via FAS-FASL engagement, suggesting that bystander activation of TRM cells during chronic HBV infection could be associated with eventual development of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. This finding is reminiscent of the bystander activation of CD8+ T cells, which is associated with liver damage in acute hepatitis A virus infection.62 We demonstrated that IL-15 activated non-hepatotropic virus-specific liver TRM cells,40 suggesting that the bystander activation of liver TRM cells contributes to liver damage in viral hepatitis. This phenomenon has also been observed in chronic hepatitis D virus infection.63

2. Metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease

As observed in chronic HBV infection, liver TRM cells also play dual roles in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)—both promoting fibrotic processes and aiding in fibrosis resolution. Activated TRM cells produce multiple cytokines, which are notably elevated in the liver and visceral fat of obese patients, potentially contributing to the inflammatory environment of the liver, and suggesting a possible association between liver damage and liver TRM cells in MASLD patients.64 This hypothesis has been elegantly proven by a recent study of human samples and mice.65 It was demonstrated that MASLD patients exhibited elevated numbers of CD103+ or CXCR6+ TRM cells, which displayed high surface levels of PD-1, but retained strong effector functions, with IL-15-induced production of IFN-γ, TNF, and granzyme B. These liver TRM cells contributed to liver damage through non-specific cytotoxicity towards hepatocytes, especially upon downregulation of the transcription factor FOXO1. Overall, these findings indicate that the self-destructive behavior of CD8+ T cells is governed by mechanisms different from those involved in antigen-specific killing by CD8+ T cells.

On the other hand, a recent study found that CD69+CD103CD8+ TRM cells may play a protective role in resolving liver fibrosis in MASLD. CD69+CD103CD8+ TRM cells could contribute to fibrosis resolution by inducing apoptosis of HSCs. Accordingly, adoptive transfer of these cells protected mice from fibrosis progression in a CCR5-dependent manner.66 Further studies are needed to explore the dual roles of TRM cells in MASLD, and their specific mechanisms. Additionally, the role of liver TRM cells in alcoholic liver disease remains to be elucidated.

3. Autoimmune liver disease

Liver TRM cells also reportedly play a pathologic role in autoimmune liver diseases. In patients with autoimmune hepatitis, liver tissue exhibits high absolute numbers of CD8+ TRM cells, which correlate with inflammation severity and fibrosis stage.67 Additionally, IL-15 and TGF-β appear to support liver TRM-cell maintenance and survival, as their intrahepatic expression is correlated with the number of these cells. In autoimmune hepatitis patients, glucocorticoid treatment reduces hepatic inflammation, and leads to decreased numbers of liver TRM cells in tissue samples. Moreover, in vitro glucocorticoid treatment inhibits the expansion of TRM cells induced by IL‐15 and TGF‐β, and leads to downregulated transcriptional activity of the BLIMP-1 gene.

Interestingly, a recent study of the biliary immune atlas revealed the presence of CD8+ TRM cells in regions of biliary inflammation among patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.68 Another study demonstrated the expansion of liver CD4+ TRM cells expressing genes associated with tissue residency, which are predisposed to polarize to Th17 cells.69 In patients with primary biliary cholangitis, the frequency of CD8+ TRM cells is positively correlated with cholestatic liver enzymes, histologic severity (in terms of inflammation and fibrosis), and responses to ursodeoxycholic acid.70

4. Other liver diseases

In the context of liver cirrhosis, our investigations suggest that activation of CD69+CD103 TRM cells correlates with impaired liver function.40 Similar to lung TRM cells inducing chronic lung fibrosis after viral pneumonia,71 liver TRM cells might be involved in the development of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis in chronic HBV infection.

In organ transplant recipients, small numbers of donor cells can reportedly persist in allografts for over a decade, including CXCR3hi CD8+ TRM cells in liver transplants.72 These cells were also present in local lymph nodes, but did not egress into the hepatic vein. The presence of long-lived TRM-cell populations in liver allografts may have implications regarding liver transplantation; however, their role in rejection or other pathologic states remains to be elucidated.

5. Liver stage of malaria

Liver CD8+ TRM cells are pivotal in the immune defense against the liver stage of malaria. Murine studies of liver-stage malaria have provided mechanistic insights regarding the generation and maintenance of liver CD8+ TRM cells, which provide immediate protection by patrolling the liver sinusoids and quickly responding to sporozoite infections. Immunization with radiation-attenuated sporozoites activates liver CD8+ TRM cells, which are crucial for sterile immunity against malaria.43 Moreover, depletion of these cells results in loss of protective immunity, emphasizing their importance.43 Studies of non-human primates show that intravenous immunization with attenuated sporozoites induces parasite-specific CD8+ TRM cells in the liver, conferring protection similar to that observed in murine models.73 These findings suggest that the mechanisms identified in animal studies can guide the development of effective malaria vaccines. Future research should focus on optimizing vaccination strategies to enhance CD8+ TRM-cell generation and function in humans, which may lead to development of highly effective malaria vaccines.

6. Study of liver TRM cells using clinical specimens

Immune cells are isolated from liver tissue samples—such as percutaneous core-needle biopsy or surgical specimens—using a combination of enzymatic and mechanical dissociation.74,75 Briefly, fresh liver tissues are treated with enzymes, e.g., collagenase and DNase, to break down the extracellular matrix. The resulting suspension is gently homogenized, and then separated by density gradient centrifugation. After centrifugation, the immune cell layer is carefully collected, washed, and resuspended in culture medium. This immune cell population includes liver TRM cells, and can be used for analyses of liver TRM cells, as previously described.40,56

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) offers several advantages over traditional needle biopsy, including that FNA is less invasive, better tolerated, and allows for repeated longitudinal sampling. During the procedure, a thin 22-gauge spinal needle is inserted into the liver parenchyma, and cells are aspirated with gentle negative pressure. FNA sample preparation typically involves collecting the aspirate in a culture medium, and centrifuging it to obtain a cell pellet, followed by treatment with red blood cell lysis buffer before analysis.76 Importantly, it has been demonstrated that FNA reliably samples liver TRM cells, although at slightly lower frequencies compared to in core-needle biopsy samples.76

Liver perfusate collection offers an alternative method for isolating intrahepatic immune cells, including liver TRM cells.77-79 During liver transplantation, graft livers are perfused with a preservation solution. The perfusate is collected, filtered, and centrifuged to isolate immune cells. Finally, liver sinusoidal mononuclear cells are separated using density gradient centrifugation. The main limitation of this technique is its dependence on liver transplantation procedures. Notably, it provides the significant advantage of yielding a large number of cells, which enables extensive and comprehensive analyses.

In this comprehensive review, we highlight the crucial roles and unique characteristics of TRM cells in the liver, which exhibit distinct profiles that enable their tissue residency and functionality. Liver TRM cells are uniquely situated within the liver sinusoids, enabling continuous interaction with circulating antigens for immune surveillance. In particular, we have summarized the protective and pathological roles of liver TRM cells in various human liver diseases—including viral hepatitis, steatotic liver disease, and autoimmune liver disease.

Future research should focus on elucidating the detailed mechanisms governing the formation, maintenance, and function of TRM cells in the liver. This work will improve our understanding of the balance between these cells’ protective roles and potential contributions to pathology. Such insights could inform the development of targeted therapies aimed at enhancing the beneficial functions of TRM cells, while mitigating their detrimental effects. Moreover, the potential use of liver TRM cells in vaccine development, particularly for diseases like malaria, presents an exciting avenue for translational research.

In conclusion, liver TRM cells constitute a critical component of hepatic immunity, and have significant implications regarding a wide range of liver diseases. Advancing our understanding of these cells will enhance our knowledge of liver immunology, as well as pave the way for novel therapeutic strategies in liver disease management.

This study was supported by the Research Fund of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea (J.W.H.), by the Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Republic of Korea, under project code IBS-R801-D2 (E.C.S.) and by the Bio&Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (RS-2024-00439160; E.C.S.).

  1. Kumar BV, Connors TJ, Farber DL. Human T cell development, localization, and function throughout life. Immunity 2018;48:202-213.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Farber DL. Tissues, not blood, are where immune cells function. Nature 2021;593:506-509.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Bartsch LM, Damasio MP, Subudhi S, Drescher HK. Tissue-resident memory T cells in the liver-unique characteristics of local specialists. Cells 2020;9:2457.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Robinson MW, Harmon C, O'Farrelly C. Liver immunology and its role in inflammation and homeostasis. Cell Mol Immunol 2016;13:267-276.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Lorente S, Hautefeuille M, Sanchez-Cedillo A. The liver, a functionalized vascular structure. Sci Rep 2020;10:16194.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Ficht X, Iannacone M. Immune surveillance of the liver by T cells. Sci Immunol 2020;5:eaba2351.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Han JW, Shin EC. Liver-resident memory CD8+ T cells: possible roles in chronic HBV infection. Int J Mol Sci 2020;22:283.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Skon CN, Lee JY, Anderson KG, Masopust D, Hogquist KA, Jameson SC. Transcriptional downregulation of S1pr1 is required for the establishment of resident memory CD8+ T cells. Nat Immunol 2013;14:1285-1293.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Wein AN, McMaster SR, Takamura S, et al. CXCR6 regulates localization of tissue-resident memory CD8 T cells to the airways. J Exp Med 2019;216:2748-2762.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Unsoeld H, Pircher H. Complex memory T-cell phenotypes revealed by coexpression of CD62L and CCR7. J Virol 2005;79:4510-4513.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Fonseca R, Burn TN, Gandolfo LC, et al. Runx3 drives a CD8+ T cell tissue residency program that is absent in CD4+ T cells. Nat Immunol 2022;23:1236-1245.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Zundler S, Becker E, Spocinska M, et al. Hobit- and Blimp-1-driven CD4+ tissue-resident memory T cells control chronic intestinal inflammation. Nat Immunol 2019;20:288-300.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Yang R, Cheng S, Luo N, et al. Distinct epigenetic features of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells in colorectal cancer patients revealed by genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Genome Biol 2019;21:2.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Li C, Zhu B, Son YM, et al. The transcription factor Bhlhe40 programs mitochondrial regulation of resident CD8+ T cell fitness and functionality. Immunity 2019;51:491-507.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Schenkel JM, Fraser KA, Casey KA, et al. IL-15-independent maintenance of tissue-resident and boosted effector memory CD8 T cells. J Immunol 2016;196:3920-3926.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Tieu R, Zeng Q, Zhao D, et al. Tissue-resident memory T cell maintenance during antigen persistence requires both cognate antigen and interleukin-15. Sci Immunol 2023;8:eadd8454.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Mackay LK, Wynne-Jones E, Freestone D, et al. T-box transcription factors combine with the cytokines TGF-β and IL-15 to control tissue-resident memory T cell fate. Immunity 2015;43:1101-1111.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Sowell RT, Rogozinska M, Nelson CE, Vezys V, Marzo AL. Cutting edge: generation of effector cells that localize to mucosal tissues and form resident memory CD8 T cells is controlled by mTOR. J Immunol 2014;193:2067-2071.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Kaech SM, Tan JT, Wherry EJ, Konieczny BT, Surh CD, Ahmed R. Selective expression of the interleukin 7 receptor identifies effector CD8 T cells that give rise to long-lived memory cells. Nat Immunol 2003;4:1191-1198.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Mackay LK, Stock AT, Ma JZ, et al. Long-lived epithelial immunity by tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells in the absence of persisting local antigen presentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:7037-7042.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Zhang N, Bevan MJ. Transforming growth factor-β signaling controls the formation and maintenance of gut-resident memory T cells by regulating migration and retention. Immunity 2013;39:687-696.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Mato N, Hirahara K, Ichikawa T, et al. Memory-type ST2+CD4+ T cells participate in the steroid-resistant pathology of eosinophilic pneumonia. Sci Rep 2017;7:6805.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Jiang X, Clark RA, Liu L, Wagers AJ, Fuhlbrigge RC, Kupper TS. Skin infection generates non-migratory memory CD8+ T(RM) cells providing global skin immunity. Nature 2012;483:227-231.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Kaufman DR, Liu J, Carville A, et al. Trafficking of antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes to mucosal surfaces following intramuscular vaccination. J Immunol 2008;181:4188-4198.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Sathaliyawala T, Kubota M, Yudanin N, et al. Distribution and compartmentalization of human circulating and tissue-resident memory T cell subsets. Immunity 2013;38:187-197.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Hombrink P, Helbig C, Backer RA, et al. Programs for the persistence, vigilance and control of human CD8+ lung-resident memory T cells. Nat Immunol 2016;17:1467-1478.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Cheuk S, Schlums H, Gallais Sérézal I, et al. CD49a expression defines tissue-resident CD8+ T cells poised for cytotoxic function in human skin. Immunity 2017;46:287-300.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Ganesan AP, Clarke J, Wood O, et al. Tissue-resident memory features are linked to the magnitude of cytotoxic T cell responses in human lung cancer. Nat Immunol 2017;18:940-950.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Koutsakos M, Illing PT, Nguyen THO, et al. Human CD8+ T cell cross-reactivity across influenza A, B and C viruses. Nat Immunol 2019;20:613-625.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Muruganandah V, Sathkumara HD, Navarro S, Kupz A. A systematic review: the role of resident memory T cells in infectious diseases and their relevance for vaccine development. Front Immunol 2018;9:1574.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Teijaro JR, Turner D, Pham Q, Wherry EJ, Lefrançois L, Farber DL. Cutting edge: tissue-retentive lung memory CD4 T cells mediate optimal protection to respiratory virus infection. J Immunol 2011;187:5510-5514.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Watanabe R, Gehad A, Yang C, et al. Human skin is protected by four functionally and phenotypically discrete populations of resident and recirculating memory T cells. Sci Transl Med 2015;7:279ra39.
    CrossRef
  33. Han JW, Yoon SK. Tissue-resident lymphocytes: implications in immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2020;22:232.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Park SL, Buzzai A, Rautela J, et al. Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells promote melanoma-immune equilibrium in skin. Nature 2019;565:366-371.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Ho AW, Kupper TS. T cells and the skin: from protective immunity to inflammatory skin disorders. Nat Rev Immunol 2019;19:490-502.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Xing L, Dai Z, Jabbari A, et al. Alopecia areata is driven by cytotoxic T lymphocytes and is reversed by JAK inhibition. Nat Med 2014;20:1043-1049.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Richmond JM, Strassner JP, Zapata L Jr, et al. Antibody blockade of IL-15 signaling has the potential to durably reverse vitiligo. Sci Transl Med 2018;10:eaam7710.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Zuber J, Shonts B, Lau SP, et al. Bidirectional intragraft alloreactivity drives the repopulation of human intestinal allografts and correlates with clinical outcome. Sci Immunol 2016;1:eaah3732.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  39. Snyder ME, Finlayson MO, Connors TJ, et al. Generation and persistence of human tissue-resident memory T cells in lung transplantation. Sci Immunol 2019;4:eaav5581.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  40. Kim JH, Han JW, Choi YJ, et al. Functions of human liver CD69+CD103-CD8+ T cells depend on HIF-2α activity in healthy and pathologic livers. J Hepatol 2020;72:1170-1181.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Guidotti LG, Inverso D, Sironi L, et al. Immunosurveillance of the liver by intravascular effector CD8(+) T cells. Cell 2015;161:486-500.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  42. Warren A, Le Couteur DG, Fraser R, Bowen DG, McCaughan GW, Bertolino P. T lymphocytes interact with hepatocytes through fenestrations in murine liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. Hepatology 2006;44:1182-1190.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Fernandez-Ruiz D, Ng WY, Holz LE, et al. Liver-resident memory CD8+ T cells form a front-line defense against malaria liver-stage infection. Immunity 2016;45:889-902.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Steinert EM, Schenkel JM, Fraser KA, et al. Quantifying memory CD8 T cells reveals regionalization of immunosurveillance. Cell 2015;161:737-749.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Mackay LK, Minnich M, Kragten NA, et al. Hobit and Blimp1 instruct a universal transcriptional program of tissue residency in lymphocytes. Science 2016;352:459-463.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Khan TN, Mooster JL, Kilgore AM, Osborn JF, Nolz JC. Local antigen in nonlymphoid tissue promotes resident memory CD8+ T cell formation during viral infection. J Exp Med 2016;213:951-966.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  47. Schildberg FA, Wojtalla A, Siegmund SV, et al. Murine hepatic stellate cells veto CD8 T cell activation by a CD54-dependent mechanism. Hepatology 2011;54:262-272.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Geissmann F, Cameron TO, Sidobre S, et al. Intravascular immune surveillance by CXCR6+ NKT cells patrolling liver sinusoids. PLoS Biol 2005;3:e113.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  49. Crispe IN, Dao T, Klugewitz K, Mehal WZ, Metz DP. The liver as a site of T-cell apoptosis: graveyard, or killing field?. Immunol Rev 2000;174:47-62.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Yu MC, Chen CH, Liang X, et al. Inhibition of T-cell responses by hepatic stellate cells via B7-H1-mediated T-cell apoptosis in mice. Hepatology 2004;40:1312-1321.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Diehl L, Schurich A, Grochtmann R, Hegenbarth S, Chen L, Knolle PA. Tolerogenic maturation of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells promotes B7-homolog 1-dependent CD8+ T cell tolerance. Hepatology 2008;47:296-305.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  52. Holz LE, Benseler V, Bowen DG, et al. Intrahepatic murine CD8 T-cell activation associates with a distinct phenotype leading to Bim-dependent death. Gastroenterology 2008;135:989-997.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  53. Bosch M, Kallin N, Donakonda S, et al. A liver immune rheostat regulates CD8 T cell immunity in chronic HBV infection. Nature 2024;631:867-875.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  54. Stelma F, de Niet A, Sinnige MJ, et al. Human intrahepatic CD69 + CD8+ T cells have a tissue resident memory T cell phenotype with reduced cytolytic capacity. Sci Rep 2017;7:6172.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Heydtmann M, Lalor PF, Eksteen JA, Hübscher SG, Briskin M, Adams DH. CXC chemokine ligand 16 promotes integrin-mediated adhesion of liver-infiltrating lymphocytes to cholangiocytes and hepatocytes within the inflamed human liver. J Immunol 2005;174:1055-1062.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  56. Pallett LJ, Davies J, Colbeck EJ, et al. IL-2high tissue-resident T cells in the human liver: sentinels for hepatotropic infection. J Exp Med 2017;214:1567-1580.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  57. Tse SW, Cockburn IA, Zhang H, Scott AL, Zavala F. Unique transcriptional profile of liver-resident memory CD8+ T cells induced by immunization with malaria sporozoites. Genes Immun 2013;14:302-309.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  58. Doedens AL, Phan AT, Stradner MH, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factors enhance the effector responses of CD8(+) T cells to persistent antigen. Nat Immunol 2013;14:1173-1182.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  59. Bénéchet AP, De Simone G, Di Lucia P, et al. Dynamics and genomic landscape of CD8+ T cells undergoing hepatic priming. Nature 2019;574:200-205.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  60. Li Y, Tang L, Guo L, et al. CXCL13-mediated recruitment of intrahepatic CXCR5+CD8+ T cells favors viral control in chronic HBV infection. J Hepatol 2020;72:420-430.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  61. Nkongolo S, Mahamed D, Kuipery A, et al. Longitudinal liver sampling in patients with chronic hepatitis B starting antiviral therapy reveals hepatotoxic CD8+ T cells. J Clin Invest 2023;133:e158903.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  62. Kim J, Chang DY, Lee HW, et al. Innate-like cytotoxic function of bystander-activated CD8+ T cells is associated with liver injury in acute hepatitis A. Immunity 2018;48:161-173.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. Kefalakes H, Horgan XJ, Jung MK, et al. Liver-resident bystander CD8+ T cells contribute to liver disease pathogenesis in chronic hepatitis D virus infection. Gastroenterology 2021;161:1567-1583.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  64. Conroy MJ, Galvin KC, Doyle SL, et al. Parallel profiles of inflammatory and effector memory T cells in visceral fat and liver of obesity-associated cancer patients. Inflammation 2016;39:1729-1736.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  65. Dudek M, Pfister D, Donakonda S, et al. Auto-aggressive CXCR6+ CD8 T cells cause liver immune pathology in NASH. Nature 2021;592:444-449.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  66. Koda Y, Teratani T, Chu PS, et al. CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells promote liver fibrosis resolution by inducing apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells. Nat Commun 2021;12:4474.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  67. You Z, Li Y, Wang Q, et al. The clinical significance of hepatic CD69+ CD103+ CD8+ resident-memory T cells in autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 2021;74:847-863.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  68. Zimmer CL, von Seth E, Buggert M, et al. A biliary immune landscape map of primary sclerosing cholangitis reveals a dominant network of neutrophils and tissue-resident T cells. Sci Transl Med 2021;13:eabb3107.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  69. Poch T, Krause J, Casar C, et al. Single-cell atlas of hepatic T cells reveals expansion of liver-resident naive-like CD4+ T cells in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol 2021;75:414-423.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  70. Huang B, Lyu Z, Qian Q, et al. NUDT1 promotes the accumulation and longevity of CD103+ TRM cells in primary biliary cholangitis. J Hepatol 2022;77:1311-1324.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  71. Goplen NP, Wu Y, Son YM, et al. Tissue-resident CD8+ T cells drive age-associated chronic lung sequelae after viral pneumonia. Sci Immunol 2020;5:eabc4557.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  72. Pallett LJ, Burton AR, Amin OE, et al. Longevity and replenishment of human liver-resident memory T cells and mononuclear phagocytes. J Exp Med 2020;217:e20200050.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  73. Epstein JE, Tewari K, Lyke KE, et al. Live attenuated malaria vaccine designed to protect through hepatic CD8+ T cell immunity. Science 2011;334:475-480.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  74. Moreno-Fernandez ME, Damen MS, Divanovic S. A protocol for isolation of primary human immune cells from the liver and mesenteric white adipose tissue biopsies. STAR Protoc 2021;2:100937.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  75. Bahrami E, Geiger T, Steixner-Kumar AA, et al. An optimized protocol for isolation of hepatic leukocytes retrieved from murine and NASH liver biopsies. STAR Protoc 2023;4:102597.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  76. Gill US, Pallett LJ, Thomas N, et al. Fine needle aspirates comprehensively sample intrahepatic immunity. Gut 2019;68:1493-1503.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  77. Rha MS, Han JW, Kim JH, et al. Human liver CD8+ MAIT cells exert TCR/MR1-independent innate-like cytotoxicity in response to IL-15. J Hepatol 2020;73:640-650.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  78. Koh JY, Rha MS, Choi SJ, et al. Identification of a distinct NK-like hepatic T-cell population activated by NKG2C in a TCR-independent manner. J Hepatol 2022;77:1059-1070.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  79. Rha MS, Han JW, Koh JY, et al. Impaired antibacterial response of liver sinusoidal Vγ9+Vδ2+ T cells in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut 2022;71:605-615.
    Pubmed CrossRef

Article

Review Article

Gut and Liver 2025; 19(2): 161-170

Published online March 15, 2025 https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl240366

Copyright © Gut and Liver.

Investigating Human Liver Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells from the Perspectives of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists

Ji Won Han1,2 , Eui-Cheol Shin3,4

1The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea; 3Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea; 4The Center for Viral Immunology, Korea Virus Research Institute, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Daejeon, Korea

Correspondence to:Ji Won Han
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-1450
E-mail tmznjf@catholic.ac.kr.

Eui-Cheol Shin
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-9503
E-mail ecshin@kaist.ac.kr.

Received: August 17, 2024; Revised: September 18, 2024; Accepted: September 22, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Liver tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells play a pivotal role in hepatic immune responses. Their unique residence within liver sinusoids allow continuous antigen surveillance. In this review, we highlight the role of liver TRM cells in protective immunity and disease pathology. Comparisons between human and murine liver TRM cells reveal species-specific characteristics, suggesting the need for human-focused studies. One key finding is the involvement of liver TRM cells in viral hepatitis, where they can both control infection and contribute to liver damage. Liver TRM cells also exhibit dual roles in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease, promoting inflammation and fibrosis while also contributing to fibrosis resolution. In autoimmune liver diseases, such as autoimmune hepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, the presence of liver TRM cells correlates with disease severity. In this review, we underscore the importance of liver TRM cells in vaccine development, particularly vaccines against malaria. Future research should focus on the mechanisms governing TRM-cell formation, maintenance, and function, with the aim of supporting their protective roles while mitigating detrimental effects. Advancing our understanding of liver TRM cells will enhance our knowledge of liver immunology and inform novel therapeutic strategies for liver disease management.

Keywords: T-lymphocytes, Tissue resident T cell, Liver diseases

INTRODUCTION

Most immune cells, including over 95% of T cells, reside and function in tissues rather than in blood.1 These tissues include lymphoid organs (e.g., bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes) and barrier surfaces (e.g., the skin, gut, and mucous membranes). Key populations of tissue-resident immune cells include tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and innate lymphoid cells, which are crucial for local immune responses.2 T cells constitute an adaptive immune cell population that plays a central role in immune defense. Notably, CD8+ T cells eliminate infected, damaged, or tumor cells, while CD4+ T cells facilitate and regulate immune responses. The most important feature of the adaptive immune system is the formation of memory T cells, which enable a rapid and effective response upon re-exposure to pathogens. TRM cells might serve this role immediately at the entry sites of various pathogens.3

The liver is a vital immunological organ, buffering gut contents and systemic circulation. About 80% of the liver’s blood supply comes from the gut via the portal vein. This blood is rich in dietary and microbial antigens, which must be processed by the liver as it performs immunosurveillance.4 Additionally, the liver has a distinctive anatomical vascular system, which allows continuous connection between immune cells, liver sinusoid endothelial cells (LSEC), and hepatocytes. Notably, its low-pressure blood flow and fenestrated endothelium facilitate interactions between immune cells and hepatic cells.5 The liver sinusoids and the space of Disse are populated by immune cells that maintain organ homeostasis and regulate inflammation. These cells adapt to this unique environment, adopting unique characteristics compared to the circulating population. For example, liver CD8+ TRM cells exhibit special characteristics compared to circulating T cells, and play crucial roles in liver immunity, participating in both the initiation and resolution of intrahepatic inflammation. Dysregulation of TRM cells is implicated in the pathogenesis of various liver diseases.6

In this review, we aim to provide valuable summaries for clinicians, such as gastroenterologists and hepatologists conducting clinical and translational research. We review the general features of CD8+ TRM cells, with specific focus on the characteristics of liver TRM cells. We will also compare liver TRM cells between humans and mice, which supports the necessity of investigating this population using human samples. Finally, we will summarize the clinical implications of the present knowledge of liver TRM cells in human liver diseases.

GENERAL FEATURES OF TRM CELLS

1. Phenotypic and transcriptional characteristics of TRM cells

The term TRM cells generally refers to conventional CD8+ memory (not naïve) T cells with αβ T cell receptor characterized by the expression of CD69 and/or CD103, which are not expressed in circulating T cells.7 CD69 and CD103 help TRM cells reside in peripheral tissues, such as the epithelium, through interaction with molecules like E-cadherin and by inhibiting KLF2 and S1PR1, which facilitate egress from peripheral organs.8 TRM cells also generally express CD49a and CXCR6,9 and lack markers typically found in central homing memory T cells, such as CCR7 and CD62L.10 One key transcription factor is Runx3, which is crucial for TRM-cell differentiation.11 Additionally, Hobit and Blimp are involved in driving TRM-cell differentiation, and have been described as important transcriptional regulators.12 Epigenetic modifications, like DNA methylation and histone acetylation, might also regulate TRM-cell development and function. DNA methylation is reduced in key genes such as PRF1, CD39, and CD103, while histone acetylation support expressions of these genes in TRM cells.13,14 These findings indicate that TRM cells have distinct phenotypic characteristics compared to circulating T cells (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Schematic representation of circulating memory T cells and tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells. Circulating memory T cells lack CD69 and CD103; recirculate between the blood and secondary lymphoid organs. TRM cells express CD69 and variably express CD103, CD49a, and CXCR6, enabling their retention in tissues, which is regulated by the downregulation of KLF2 and S1PR1. CXCR6, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 6; KLF2, Krüppel-like factor 2; S1PR1, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1.

2. Generation and maintenance of TRM cells

Multiple exposures to antigens can generate large pools of TRM cells without altering the pre-existing T-cell pool, suggesting that antigen stimulation plays an important role in TRM-cell generation.15 Some reports indicate that antigen stimulation is also required to maintain this population.16 Additionally, cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-15 have been considered critical for TRM-cell differentiation and survival, through mechanisms involving mTOR signaling pathways.17-20 Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β is also involved in converting circulating effector T cells into TRM cells by enhancing the expressions of key surface receptors and transcription factors required for tissue residency.17,21 Moreover, IL-33 can promote TRM-cell survival and activation through the ST2 receptor.22 Hypoxia might also be linked to TRM-cell generation and maintenance.15 Although several mechanisms reportedly support TRM-cell maintenance, little is known about the longevity of human TRM cells. Notably, studies in mice and rhesus macaques demonstrate that TRM cells are stable for 300 to 700 days,23,24 suggesting that they are capable of long-term stable survival.

3. Functional characteristics of TRM cells

TRM cells are located in various tissues—including the skin, lungs, salivary glands, intestines, and other mucosal sites—and can exist in both lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues.25 They are essential for conferring local immune protection against infections, and rapidly respond to pathogens without requiring recruitment from the bloodstream, thereby serving as an immediate defense line.25 Upon encountering pathogens, TRM cells can proliferate and secrete effector cytokines, such as interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), which control infections and recruit other immune cells to the infection site.26,27 TRM cells also contain cytotoxic molecules that can directly kill target cells.28 In particular, TRM cells play a significant role in defense against viral infections. For instance, influenza-specific TRM cells in the lungs provide long-term protection by swiftly responding to re-infection and mounting a robust immune response.29 TRM cells also participate in defenses against bacterial and fungal infections. They can recognize and respond to these pathogens, ensuring rapid clearance and preventing widespread infection.30 Importantly, TRM cells adapt to the specific tissue environments they inhabit. For instance, lung TRM cells are particularly adept at responding to respiratory pathogens, while skin TRM cells are suited to handling cutaneous infections.31,32 TRM cells also significantly contribute to tumor surveillance and control. Higher TRM-cell frequencies in tumors correlate with better patient outcomes, because these cells can produce effector cytokines and directly lyse tumor cells in various cancer types.33 TRM cells might also play a fundamental role in surveilling subclinical tumors and thereby maintaining cancer–immune equilibrium. A previous study in a mouse model demonstrated that TRM cells within the epidermal layer of skin promoted a durable melanoma–immune equilibrium.34 Skin TRM cells played a crucial role in melanoma suppression, as evidenced by the findings that TRM-cell generation was correlated with macroscopic tumor-free status, while TRM-cell depletion led to tumor growth.

Although protective against infections, TRM cells can also contribute to the pathology of autoimmune diseases. In conditions like psoriasis and vitiligo, TRM cells drive inflammation and tissue damage through pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion.27,35-37 The persistence of TRM cells in affected tissues can promote chronic inflammation, exacerbating autoimmune conditions. Understanding these dual roles will help us to develop therapies that target pathogenic TRM cells while preserving their protective functions. Notably, after organ transplantation, donor-derived TRM cells can persist in grafts, and may either promote graft acceptance or contribute to rejection, depending on interactions between donor and recipient immune cells.38,39 These findings suggest that TRM cells might play dual roles in tissue protection and damage, which may vary depending on the clinical situation. In the following sections, we will review unique characteristics of liver TRM cells, and their clinical relevance in various liver diseases.

CHARACTERISTICS OF LIVER TRM CELLS

Fig. 2 presents the compositions of the mononuclear cell populations of the liver and peripheral blood, as we demonstrated in a study using liver perfusate.40 Importantly, the liver exhibits higher proportions of natural killer cells, mucosal-associated invariant T cells, and CD8+ T cells, whereas the peripheral blood shows a higher proportion of CD4+ T cells, suggesting that the liver constitutes a unique immune environment. CD69+CD8+ liver TRM cells comprise 20% to 80% of liver CD8+ T cells.40 Below we will summarize the unique characteristics of liver TRM cells.

Figure 2. Comparison of the mononuclear cell populations in peripheral blood and liver sinusoidal perfusates. Pie charts indicate the proportions of different immune cell subsets in peripheral blood (A) and liver sinusoidal perfusate (B), as measured by flow cytometry. MAIT, mucosal-associated invariant T cells; NK, natural killer cells.

1. Location of liver TRM cells

In most organs, TRM cells reside within epithelial tissues or parenchyma; however, liver TRM cells are mainly located within the sinusoids and constantly patrol the hepatic vasculature. The liver receives blood from both arterial and venous circulations, and the portal vein transports a significant volume of blood to the liver from the gastrointestinal tract and spleen. Upon reaching the liver, blood travels through narrow vascular capillaries called liver sinusoids, which slow the flow rate, enabling resident cells to interact with a wide range of antigens and circulating cells.4 The liver sinusoids are lined with a thin fenestrated layer of LSECs that separates hepatocytes from circulating cells. The fenestrae allow T cells in the blood to directly access the surface of hepatocytes or tissue stroma, facilitating antigen recognition and effector functions.41,42 In summary, liver TRM cells are located within the sinusoids and are continuously exposed to the bloodstream, which may affect their unique phenotypes and functions, compared to TRM cells in other tissues that are anatomically isolated from the circulation.43 Interestingly, intravital imaging has directly shown that liver TRM cells have an amoeboid shape and are uniquely positioned in the vasculature, where they patrol the liver sinusoids at faster migration speeds compared to skin TRM cells.43-45

2. Formation of liver TRM cells

During an immune response, local antigen presentation and inflammation significantly impact TRM-cell differentiation and seeding within tissues.43,46 However, the liver's vasculature ensures that circulating TRM-cell precursors have direct access to liver TRM-cell niches without having to leave the bloodstream. Therefore, TRM cells are formed by local CD8+ T-cell proliferation, but can also be induced by adhesion molecules or chemokines. The retention of circulating T cells within liver sinusoids is initially facilitated by their docking to platelets, which adhere to sinusoidal hyaluronan in a CD44-dependent manner. Next, these T cells migrate along the liver sinusoids and recognize hepatocellular antigens, which can induce liver TRM-cell differentiation.41 Another study reported that T cells may become trapped within liver sinusoids by LSECs, Kupffer cells, and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), which promote increased expression of adhesion molecules, such as ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and VAP-1.47 As T cells become trapped and migrate within the sinusoids, they interact with other cell types in the liver, which provide TRM-inducing factors. Interactions with integrins, as well as chemokine receptors and their ligands, are crucial for liver TRM cells. For example, CXCR6-CXCL16 interaction is essential for liver TRM-cell retention, as is the interaction between LFA-1 and ICAM-1.43,46,4

3. A unique functional characteristic of liver TRM cells

The liver is well-known as an immune-tolerant organ, and this concept can also be applied to liver T-cell responses. Before the concept of TRM cells emerged, investigations focused on liver T-cell characteristics, particularly their trapping, activation, and tolerance mechanisms. One early study provides a concise overview of liver T-cell responses, noting that activated T cells were trapped in the liver and subsequently underwent apoptosis, indicating that the liver not only accumulates T cells but can also promote their tolerance.49

Under normal conditions, various gut-derived substances enter the liver through the portal vein, and the hepatic microenvironment influences liver T cells to become tolerant. To limit liver T-cell responses, HSCs express programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which triggers T-cell apoptosis.50 Furthermore, antigen presentation by LSECs can induce antigen-specific T-cell tolerance via PD-1/PD-L1 interaction.51 Mouse HSCs can disrupt CD8+ T cells in an ICAM-1-dependent manner, thereby preventing their activation by antigen-presenting cells, and leading to apoptosis.47 Hepatocytes can also prime CD8+ T cells, but they induce clonal T-cell deletion through a Bcl-2-interacting mediator of cell death-dependent pathway.52

A recent study clearly demonstrated the role of LSECs in restricting liver TRM-cell activation and function in a pre-clinical model of hepatitis B virus (HBV).53 HBV-specific liver TRM cells exhibited reduced function, which was induced by the adenylyl cyclase–cAMP–PKA axis and related to close contact with LSECs, suggesting that LSECs play a direct role in T-cell tolerance. Overall, these interactions between liver T cells and other cell populations contribute to the regulation of tolerance, which may differ among various clinical situations.

4. Comparisons between human and murine liver TRM cells

Human and murine liver TRM cells share several core characteristics. Firstly, they both exhibit upregulation of CD69, a representative marker of TRM cells. This might reflect common mechanisms for retaining these cells within the liver sinusoids, and facilitating their interaction with antigens.43,54 CXCR6 is also highly expressed in liver TRM cells from both species. This chemokine receptor plays critical roles in the adhesion, accumulation, and maintenance of intrahepatic T cells. CXCL16, the ligand for CXCR6, is expressed by LSECs, Kupffer cells, and hepatocytes, which facilitates the residency of liver TRM cells.40,55,56 Moreover, in both humans and mice, liver TRM cells are essential for mounting protective immune responses by producing cytokines (e.g., IFN-γ and TNF) and expressing cytotoxic molecules (e.g., granzyme B), although the expression levels may vary.40,43 Additionally, both human and murine liver TRM cells are critically influenced by IL-15, which is crucial for their development, maintenance, and homeostatic proliferation.40,56,57

However, there are notable differences between human and murine liver TRM cells, reflecting species-specific adaptations and functions. One striking difference is that murine liver TRM cells do not express CD103, which is typically found in TRM cells from other tissues, and is expressed by a subset of human liver TRM cells (approximately 12.4%), indicating a species-specific divergence in the phenotypic characteristics of liver TRM cells.40,43,45,56 Among human liver TRM cells, CD103+ cells produce more IFN-γ and IL-2 upon stimulation and express higher perforin levels, while CD103 cells (although more numerous) show less cytokine production per cell and higher PD-1 expression.40 The expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-2α in human CD103 TRM cells suggests unique regulatory mechanisms driven by the liver’s hypoxic environment, which has not been prominently reported in murine studies.40,58 These differences highlight the importance of human-specific studies to fully understand human liver TRM cells, and their implications for liver diseases and therapies.

LIVER TRM CELLS IN HUMAN LIVER DISEASES

Previous studies demonstrate that liver TRM cells have special characteristics within the liver immune environment. In particular, their tolerant nature might play different roles in various liver diseases. Table 1 presents direct evidence regarding the liver TRM population and its clinical relevance in human liver diseases. In the following sections, we will summarize the clinical and experimental studies of this topic, which reveal the dual roles of liver TRM cells.

Table 1 . Human Studies of Liver TRM Cells and their Clinical Correlations in Various Liver Diseases.

AuthorDiseasesTRM phenotypeClinical correlations from human subjectsProtective/pathologic
Pallett et al.56HBVCD69+CD103+CD8+TRM↑ → HBV viral load ↓Protective
Koda et al.66MASLDCD69+CD8+TRM↑ → Fibrosis↓Protective
Nkongolo et al.61HBVCXCR6+CD8+Resolution of hepatitis → TRMPathologic
Kefalakes et al.63HDVCD69+CXCR6+CD8+NKG2D↑ on TRM → Liver enzymes and APRI↑Pathologic
Dudek et al.65MASLDCXCR6+CD8+TRM↑ → ALT↑Pathologic
You et al.67AIHCD69+CD103+CD8+TRM↑ → ALT, histologic inflammation/fibrosis↑Pathologic
Huang et al.70PBCCD103+CD8+TRM↑ → ALP, GGT, TB↑, histologic inflammation/fibrosis↑Pathologic
Kim et al.40LCCD69+CD103CD8+TRM activation↑ → MELD, Child-Pugh score↑Pathologic

TRM, tissue-resident memory T cells; HBV, hepatitis B virus; MASLD, metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease; HDV, hepatitis D virus; NKG2D, natural killer group 2D; APRI, aspartate transaminase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; PBC, primary biliary cholangitis; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; TB, total bilirubin; LC, liver cirrhosis; MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease..



1. Viral hepatitis

T-cell responses are critical determinants of the clinical outcome of chronic HBV infection, and studies have also investigated liver TRM cells’ roles and relationship with clinical outcomes. Murine models have provided clues indicating that liver TRM cells are a potential target for treating chronic HBV infection. Interestingly, hepatic priming of intrahepatic CD8+ T cells induces dysfunctional responses, which can be restored by IL-2 treatment but not by anti-PD-L1 blockade.59 Another study highlighted that the CXCL13-mediated accumulation of intrahepatic CXCR5+CD8+ T cells was correlated with decreased HBsAg levels, suggesting that liver TRM cells may play a positive role in controlling HBV infection.60

Studies have also characterized the protective role of human liver HBV-specific CD8+ TRM cells in patients with chronic HBV infection.56 Over 80% of liver HBV-specific CD8+ T cells express CD69, and the CD69+CD103+CD8+ subpopulation inversely correlates with HBV viral load, indicating a potential role in HBV control. This subpopulation also produces high IL-2 levels upon HBV-peptide stimulation, which may enhance HBV-specific T-cell responses. On the other hand, compared to CD103+ cells, our previous study demonstrated that CD69+CD103CD8+ TRM cells produce lower cytokine levels per cell upon HBV-peptide stimulation, although we did not investigate any direct correlations between clinical parameters.40 Since the majority of human liver TRM cells exhibit the CD103 phenotype, understanding the hypofunction mechanisms and enhancing the function of CD69+CD103CD8+ TRM cells could be pivotal for HBV control.

The pathological roles of liver TRM cells during HBV infection also warrant attention. A recent study identified highly activated liver CD8+ TRM cells that were associated with liver damage in chronic hepatitis B patients.61 Upon in vitro stimulation with IL-2 and IL-12, these cells lysed target cells via FAS-FASL engagement, suggesting that bystander activation of TRM cells during chronic HBV infection could be associated with eventual development of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. This finding is reminiscent of the bystander activation of CD8+ T cells, which is associated with liver damage in acute hepatitis A virus infection.62 We demonstrated that IL-15 activated non-hepatotropic virus-specific liver TRM cells,40 suggesting that the bystander activation of liver TRM cells contributes to liver damage in viral hepatitis. This phenomenon has also been observed in chronic hepatitis D virus infection.63

2. Metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease

As observed in chronic HBV infection, liver TRM cells also play dual roles in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)—both promoting fibrotic processes and aiding in fibrosis resolution. Activated TRM cells produce multiple cytokines, which are notably elevated in the liver and visceral fat of obese patients, potentially contributing to the inflammatory environment of the liver, and suggesting a possible association between liver damage and liver TRM cells in MASLD patients.64 This hypothesis has been elegantly proven by a recent study of human samples and mice.65 It was demonstrated that MASLD patients exhibited elevated numbers of CD103+ or CXCR6+ TRM cells, which displayed high surface levels of PD-1, but retained strong effector functions, with IL-15-induced production of IFN-γ, TNF, and granzyme B. These liver TRM cells contributed to liver damage through non-specific cytotoxicity towards hepatocytes, especially upon downregulation of the transcription factor FOXO1. Overall, these findings indicate that the self-destructive behavior of CD8+ T cells is governed by mechanisms different from those involved in antigen-specific killing by CD8+ T cells.

On the other hand, a recent study found that CD69+CD103CD8+ TRM cells may play a protective role in resolving liver fibrosis in MASLD. CD69+CD103CD8+ TRM cells could contribute to fibrosis resolution by inducing apoptosis of HSCs. Accordingly, adoptive transfer of these cells protected mice from fibrosis progression in a CCR5-dependent manner.66 Further studies are needed to explore the dual roles of TRM cells in MASLD, and their specific mechanisms. Additionally, the role of liver TRM cells in alcoholic liver disease remains to be elucidated.

3. Autoimmune liver disease

Liver TRM cells also reportedly play a pathologic role in autoimmune liver diseases. In patients with autoimmune hepatitis, liver tissue exhibits high absolute numbers of CD8+ TRM cells, which correlate with inflammation severity and fibrosis stage.67 Additionally, IL-15 and TGF-β appear to support liver TRM-cell maintenance and survival, as their intrahepatic expression is correlated with the number of these cells. In autoimmune hepatitis patients, glucocorticoid treatment reduces hepatic inflammation, and leads to decreased numbers of liver TRM cells in tissue samples. Moreover, in vitro glucocorticoid treatment inhibits the expansion of TRM cells induced by IL‐15 and TGF‐β, and leads to downregulated transcriptional activity of the BLIMP-1 gene.

Interestingly, a recent study of the biliary immune atlas revealed the presence of CD8+ TRM cells in regions of biliary inflammation among patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.68 Another study demonstrated the expansion of liver CD4+ TRM cells expressing genes associated with tissue residency, which are predisposed to polarize to Th17 cells.69 In patients with primary biliary cholangitis, the frequency of CD8+ TRM cells is positively correlated with cholestatic liver enzymes, histologic severity (in terms of inflammation and fibrosis), and responses to ursodeoxycholic acid.70

4. Other liver diseases

In the context of liver cirrhosis, our investigations suggest that activation of CD69+CD103 TRM cells correlates with impaired liver function.40 Similar to lung TRM cells inducing chronic lung fibrosis after viral pneumonia,71 liver TRM cells might be involved in the development of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis in chronic HBV infection.

In organ transplant recipients, small numbers of donor cells can reportedly persist in allografts for over a decade, including CXCR3hi CD8+ TRM cells in liver transplants.72 These cells were also present in local lymph nodes, but did not egress into the hepatic vein. The presence of long-lived TRM-cell populations in liver allografts may have implications regarding liver transplantation; however, their role in rejection or other pathologic states remains to be elucidated.

5. Liver stage of malaria

Liver CD8+ TRM cells are pivotal in the immune defense against the liver stage of malaria. Murine studies of liver-stage malaria have provided mechanistic insights regarding the generation and maintenance of liver CD8+ TRM cells, which provide immediate protection by patrolling the liver sinusoids and quickly responding to sporozoite infections. Immunization with radiation-attenuated sporozoites activates liver CD8+ TRM cells, which are crucial for sterile immunity against malaria.43 Moreover, depletion of these cells results in loss of protective immunity, emphasizing their importance.43 Studies of non-human primates show that intravenous immunization with attenuated sporozoites induces parasite-specific CD8+ TRM cells in the liver, conferring protection similar to that observed in murine models.73 These findings suggest that the mechanisms identified in animal studies can guide the development of effective malaria vaccines. Future research should focus on optimizing vaccination strategies to enhance CD8+ TRM-cell generation and function in humans, which may lead to development of highly effective malaria vaccines.

6. Study of liver TRM cells using clinical specimens

Immune cells are isolated from liver tissue samples—such as percutaneous core-needle biopsy or surgical specimens—using a combination of enzymatic and mechanical dissociation.74,75 Briefly, fresh liver tissues are treated with enzymes, e.g., collagenase and DNase, to break down the extracellular matrix. The resulting suspension is gently homogenized, and then separated by density gradient centrifugation. After centrifugation, the immune cell layer is carefully collected, washed, and resuspended in culture medium. This immune cell population includes liver TRM cells, and can be used for analyses of liver TRM cells, as previously described.40,56

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) offers several advantages over traditional needle biopsy, including that FNA is less invasive, better tolerated, and allows for repeated longitudinal sampling. During the procedure, a thin 22-gauge spinal needle is inserted into the liver parenchyma, and cells are aspirated with gentle negative pressure. FNA sample preparation typically involves collecting the aspirate in a culture medium, and centrifuging it to obtain a cell pellet, followed by treatment with red blood cell lysis buffer before analysis.76 Importantly, it has been demonstrated that FNA reliably samples liver TRM cells, although at slightly lower frequencies compared to in core-needle biopsy samples.76

Liver perfusate collection offers an alternative method for isolating intrahepatic immune cells, including liver TRM cells.77-79 During liver transplantation, graft livers are perfused with a preservation solution. The perfusate is collected, filtered, and centrifuged to isolate immune cells. Finally, liver sinusoidal mononuclear cells are separated using density gradient centrifugation. The main limitation of this technique is its dependence on liver transplantation procedures. Notably, it provides the significant advantage of yielding a large number of cells, which enables extensive and comprehensive analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In this comprehensive review, we highlight the crucial roles and unique characteristics of TRM cells in the liver, which exhibit distinct profiles that enable their tissue residency and functionality. Liver TRM cells are uniquely situated within the liver sinusoids, enabling continuous interaction with circulating antigens for immune surveillance. In particular, we have summarized the protective and pathological roles of liver TRM cells in various human liver diseases—including viral hepatitis, steatotic liver disease, and autoimmune liver disease.

Future research should focus on elucidating the detailed mechanisms governing the formation, maintenance, and function of TRM cells in the liver. This work will improve our understanding of the balance between these cells’ protective roles and potential contributions to pathology. Such insights could inform the development of targeted therapies aimed at enhancing the beneficial functions of TRM cells, while mitigating their detrimental effects. Moreover, the potential use of liver TRM cells in vaccine development, particularly for diseases like malaria, presents an exciting avenue for translational research.

In conclusion, liver TRM cells constitute a critical component of hepatic immunity, and have significant implications regarding a wide range of liver diseases. Advancing our understanding of these cells will enhance our knowledge of liver immunology, as well as pave the way for novel therapeutic strategies in liver disease management.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by the Research Fund of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea (J.W.H.), by the Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Republic of Korea, under project code IBS-R801-D2 (E.C.S.) and by the Bio&Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (RS-2024-00439160; E.C.S.).

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

J.W.H. and E.C.S. wrote, reviewed, and submitted the manuscript.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Schematic representation of circulating memory T cells and tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells. Circulating memory T cells lack CD69 and CD103; recirculate between the blood and secondary lymphoid organs. TRM cells express CD69 and variably express CD103, CD49a, and CXCR6, enabling their retention in tissues, which is regulated by the downregulation of KLF2 and S1PR1. CXCR6, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 6; KLF2, Krüppel-like factor 2; S1PR1, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1.
Gut and Liver 2025; 19: 161-170https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl240366

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Comparison of the mononuclear cell populations in peripheral blood and liver sinusoidal perfusates. Pie charts indicate the proportions of different immune cell subsets in peripheral blood (A) and liver sinusoidal perfusate (B), as measured by flow cytometry. MAIT, mucosal-associated invariant T cells; NK, natural killer cells.
Gut and Liver 2025; 19: 161-170https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl240366

Table 1 Human Studies of Liver TRM Cells and their Clinical Correlations in Various Liver Diseases

AuthorDiseasesTRM phenotypeClinical correlations from human subjectsProtective/pathologic
Pallett et al.56HBVCD69+CD103+CD8+TRM↑ → HBV viral load ↓Protective
Koda et al.66MASLDCD69+CD8+TRM↑ → Fibrosis↓Protective
Nkongolo et al.61HBVCXCR6+CD8+Resolution of hepatitis → TRMPathologic
Kefalakes et al.63HDVCD69+CXCR6+CD8+NKG2D↑ on TRM → Liver enzymes and APRI↑Pathologic
Dudek et al.65MASLDCXCR6+CD8+TRM↑ → ALT↑Pathologic
You et al.67AIHCD69+CD103+CD8+TRM↑ → ALT, histologic inflammation/fibrosis↑Pathologic
Huang et al.70PBCCD103+CD8+TRM↑ → ALP, GGT, TB↑, histologic inflammation/fibrosis↑Pathologic
Kim et al.40LCCD69+CD103CD8+TRM activation↑ → MELD, Child-Pugh score↑Pathologic

TRM, tissue-resident memory T cells; HBV, hepatitis B virus; MASLD, metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease; HDV, hepatitis D virus; NKG2D, natural killer group 2D; APRI, aspartate transaminase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; PBC, primary biliary cholangitis; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; TB, total bilirubin; LC, liver cirrhosis; MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease.


References

  1. Kumar BV, Connors TJ, Farber DL. Human T cell development, localization, and function throughout life. Immunity 2018;48:202-213.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Farber DL. Tissues, not blood, are where immune cells function. Nature 2021;593:506-509.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Bartsch LM, Damasio MP, Subudhi S, Drescher HK. Tissue-resident memory T cells in the liver-unique characteristics of local specialists. Cells 2020;9:2457.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Robinson MW, Harmon C, O'Farrelly C. Liver immunology and its role in inflammation and homeostasis. Cell Mol Immunol 2016;13:267-276.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Lorente S, Hautefeuille M, Sanchez-Cedillo A. The liver, a functionalized vascular structure. Sci Rep 2020;10:16194.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Ficht X, Iannacone M. Immune surveillance of the liver by T cells. Sci Immunol 2020;5:eaba2351.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  7. Han JW, Shin EC. Liver-resident memory CD8+ T cells: possible roles in chronic HBV infection. Int J Mol Sci 2020;22:283.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Skon CN, Lee JY, Anderson KG, Masopust D, Hogquist KA, Jameson SC. Transcriptional downregulation of S1pr1 is required for the establishment of resident memory CD8+ T cells. Nat Immunol 2013;14:1285-1293.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Wein AN, McMaster SR, Takamura S, et al. CXCR6 regulates localization of tissue-resident memory CD8 T cells to the airways. J Exp Med 2019;216:2748-2762.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Unsoeld H, Pircher H. Complex memory T-cell phenotypes revealed by coexpression of CD62L and CCR7. J Virol 2005;79:4510-4513.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Fonseca R, Burn TN, Gandolfo LC, et al. Runx3 drives a CD8+ T cell tissue residency program that is absent in CD4+ T cells. Nat Immunol 2022;23:1236-1245.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Zundler S, Becker E, Spocinska M, et al. Hobit- and Blimp-1-driven CD4+ tissue-resident memory T cells control chronic intestinal inflammation. Nat Immunol 2019;20:288-300.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Yang R, Cheng S, Luo N, et al. Distinct epigenetic features of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells in colorectal cancer patients revealed by genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Genome Biol 2019;21:2.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Li C, Zhu B, Son YM, et al. The transcription factor Bhlhe40 programs mitochondrial regulation of resident CD8+ T cell fitness and functionality. Immunity 2019;51:491-507.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Schenkel JM, Fraser KA, Casey KA, et al. IL-15-independent maintenance of tissue-resident and boosted effector memory CD8 T cells. J Immunol 2016;196:3920-3926.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Tieu R, Zeng Q, Zhao D, et al. Tissue-resident memory T cell maintenance during antigen persistence requires both cognate antigen and interleukin-15. Sci Immunol 2023;8:eadd8454.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Mackay LK, Wynne-Jones E, Freestone D, et al. T-box transcription factors combine with the cytokines TGF-β and IL-15 to control tissue-resident memory T cell fate. Immunity 2015;43:1101-1111.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Sowell RT, Rogozinska M, Nelson CE, Vezys V, Marzo AL. Cutting edge: generation of effector cells that localize to mucosal tissues and form resident memory CD8 T cells is controlled by mTOR. J Immunol 2014;193:2067-2071.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Kaech SM, Tan JT, Wherry EJ, Konieczny BT, Surh CD, Ahmed R. Selective expression of the interleukin 7 receptor identifies effector CD8 T cells that give rise to long-lived memory cells. Nat Immunol 2003;4:1191-1198.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Mackay LK, Stock AT, Ma JZ, et al. Long-lived epithelial immunity by tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells in the absence of persisting local antigen presentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:7037-7042.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  21. Zhang N, Bevan MJ. Transforming growth factor-β signaling controls the formation and maintenance of gut-resident memory T cells by regulating migration and retention. Immunity 2013;39:687-696.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Mato N, Hirahara K, Ichikawa T, et al. Memory-type ST2+CD4+ T cells participate in the steroid-resistant pathology of eosinophilic pneumonia. Sci Rep 2017;7:6805.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Jiang X, Clark RA, Liu L, Wagers AJ, Fuhlbrigge RC, Kupper TS. Skin infection generates non-migratory memory CD8+ T(RM) cells providing global skin immunity. Nature 2012;483:227-231.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Kaufman DR, Liu J, Carville A, et al. Trafficking of antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes to mucosal surfaces following intramuscular vaccination. J Immunol 2008;181:4188-4198.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Sathaliyawala T, Kubota M, Yudanin N, et al. Distribution and compartmentalization of human circulating and tissue-resident memory T cell subsets. Immunity 2013;38:187-197.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Hombrink P, Helbig C, Backer RA, et al. Programs for the persistence, vigilance and control of human CD8+ lung-resident memory T cells. Nat Immunol 2016;17:1467-1478.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Cheuk S, Schlums H, Gallais Sérézal I, et al. CD49a expression defines tissue-resident CD8+ T cells poised for cytotoxic function in human skin. Immunity 2017;46:287-300.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  28. Ganesan AP, Clarke J, Wood O, et al. Tissue-resident memory features are linked to the magnitude of cytotoxic T cell responses in human lung cancer. Nat Immunol 2017;18:940-950.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Koutsakos M, Illing PT, Nguyen THO, et al. Human CD8+ T cell cross-reactivity across influenza A, B and C viruses. Nat Immunol 2019;20:613-625.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  30. Muruganandah V, Sathkumara HD, Navarro S, Kupz A. A systematic review: the role of resident memory T cells in infectious diseases and their relevance for vaccine development. Front Immunol 2018;9:1574.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Teijaro JR, Turner D, Pham Q, Wherry EJ, Lefrançois L, Farber DL. Cutting edge: tissue-retentive lung memory CD4 T cells mediate optimal protection to respiratory virus infection. J Immunol 2011;187:5510-5514.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Watanabe R, Gehad A, Yang C, et al. Human skin is protected by four functionally and phenotypically discrete populations of resident and recirculating memory T cells. Sci Transl Med 2015;7:279ra39.
    CrossRef
  33. Han JW, Yoon SK. Tissue-resident lymphocytes: implications in immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 2020;22:232.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Park SL, Buzzai A, Rautela J, et al. Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells promote melanoma-immune equilibrium in skin. Nature 2019;565:366-371.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Ho AW, Kupper TS. T cells and the skin: from protective immunity to inflammatory skin disorders. Nat Rev Immunol 2019;19:490-502.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Xing L, Dai Z, Jabbari A, et al. Alopecia areata is driven by cytotoxic T lymphocytes and is reversed by JAK inhibition. Nat Med 2014;20:1043-1049.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  37. Richmond JM, Strassner JP, Zapata L Jr, et al. Antibody blockade of IL-15 signaling has the potential to durably reverse vitiligo. Sci Transl Med 2018;10:eaam7710.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Zuber J, Shonts B, Lau SP, et al. Bidirectional intragraft alloreactivity drives the repopulation of human intestinal allografts and correlates with clinical outcome. Sci Immunol 2016;1:eaah3732.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  39. Snyder ME, Finlayson MO, Connors TJ, et al. Generation and persistence of human tissue-resident memory T cells in lung transplantation. Sci Immunol 2019;4:eaav5581.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  40. Kim JH, Han JW, Choi YJ, et al. Functions of human liver CD69+CD103-CD8+ T cells depend on HIF-2α activity in healthy and pathologic livers. J Hepatol 2020;72:1170-1181.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Guidotti LG, Inverso D, Sironi L, et al. Immunosurveillance of the liver by intravascular effector CD8(+) T cells. Cell 2015;161:486-500.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  42. Warren A, Le Couteur DG, Fraser R, Bowen DG, McCaughan GW, Bertolino P. T lymphocytes interact with hepatocytes through fenestrations in murine liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. Hepatology 2006;44:1182-1190.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  43. Fernandez-Ruiz D, Ng WY, Holz LE, et al. Liver-resident memory CD8+ T cells form a front-line defense against malaria liver-stage infection. Immunity 2016;45:889-902.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  44. Steinert EM, Schenkel JM, Fraser KA, et al. Quantifying memory CD8 T cells reveals regionalization of immunosurveillance. Cell 2015;161:737-749.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  45. Mackay LK, Minnich M, Kragten NA, et al. Hobit and Blimp1 instruct a universal transcriptional program of tissue residency in lymphocytes. Science 2016;352:459-463.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  46. Khan TN, Mooster JL, Kilgore AM, Osborn JF, Nolz JC. Local antigen in nonlymphoid tissue promotes resident memory CD8+ T cell formation during viral infection. J Exp Med 2016;213:951-966.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  47. Schildberg FA, Wojtalla A, Siegmund SV, et al. Murine hepatic stellate cells veto CD8 T cell activation by a CD54-dependent mechanism. Hepatology 2011;54:262-272.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  48. Geissmann F, Cameron TO, Sidobre S, et al. Intravascular immune surveillance by CXCR6+ NKT cells patrolling liver sinusoids. PLoS Biol 2005;3:e113.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  49. Crispe IN, Dao T, Klugewitz K, Mehal WZ, Metz DP. The liver as a site of T-cell apoptosis: graveyard, or killing field?. Immunol Rev 2000;174:47-62.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Yu MC, Chen CH, Liang X, et al. Inhibition of T-cell responses by hepatic stellate cells via B7-H1-mediated T-cell apoptosis in mice. Hepatology 2004;40:1312-1321.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Diehl L, Schurich A, Grochtmann R, Hegenbarth S, Chen L, Knolle PA. Tolerogenic maturation of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells promotes B7-homolog 1-dependent CD8+ T cell tolerance. Hepatology 2008;47:296-305.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  52. Holz LE, Benseler V, Bowen DG, et al. Intrahepatic murine CD8 T-cell activation associates with a distinct phenotype leading to Bim-dependent death. Gastroenterology 2008;135:989-997.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  53. Bosch M, Kallin N, Donakonda S, et al. A liver immune rheostat regulates CD8 T cell immunity in chronic HBV infection. Nature 2024;631:867-875.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  54. Stelma F, de Niet A, Sinnige MJ, et al. Human intrahepatic CD69 + CD8+ T cells have a tissue resident memory T cell phenotype with reduced cytolytic capacity. Sci Rep 2017;7:6172.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  55. Heydtmann M, Lalor PF, Eksteen JA, Hübscher SG, Briskin M, Adams DH. CXC chemokine ligand 16 promotes integrin-mediated adhesion of liver-infiltrating lymphocytes to cholangiocytes and hepatocytes within the inflamed human liver. J Immunol 2005;174:1055-1062.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  56. Pallett LJ, Davies J, Colbeck EJ, et al. IL-2high tissue-resident T cells in the human liver: sentinels for hepatotropic infection. J Exp Med 2017;214:1567-1580.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  57. Tse SW, Cockburn IA, Zhang H, Scott AL, Zavala F. Unique transcriptional profile of liver-resident memory CD8+ T cells induced by immunization with malaria sporozoites. Genes Immun 2013;14:302-309.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  58. Doedens AL, Phan AT, Stradner MH, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factors enhance the effector responses of CD8(+) T cells to persistent antigen. Nat Immunol 2013;14:1173-1182.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  59. Bénéchet AP, De Simone G, Di Lucia P, et al. Dynamics and genomic landscape of CD8+ T cells undergoing hepatic priming. Nature 2019;574:200-205.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  60. Li Y, Tang L, Guo L, et al. CXCL13-mediated recruitment of intrahepatic CXCR5+CD8+ T cells favors viral control in chronic HBV infection. J Hepatol 2020;72:420-430.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  61. Nkongolo S, Mahamed D, Kuipery A, et al. Longitudinal liver sampling in patients with chronic hepatitis B starting antiviral therapy reveals hepatotoxic CD8+ T cells. J Clin Invest 2023;133:e158903.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  62. Kim J, Chang DY, Lee HW, et al. Innate-like cytotoxic function of bystander-activated CD8+ T cells is associated with liver injury in acute hepatitis A. Immunity 2018;48:161-173.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  63. Kefalakes H, Horgan XJ, Jung MK, et al. Liver-resident bystander CD8+ T cells contribute to liver disease pathogenesis in chronic hepatitis D virus infection. Gastroenterology 2021;161:1567-1583.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  64. Conroy MJ, Galvin KC, Doyle SL, et al. Parallel profiles of inflammatory and effector memory T cells in visceral fat and liver of obesity-associated cancer patients. Inflammation 2016;39:1729-1736.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  65. Dudek M, Pfister D, Donakonda S, et al. Auto-aggressive CXCR6+ CD8 T cells cause liver immune pathology in NASH. Nature 2021;592:444-449.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  66. Koda Y, Teratani T, Chu PS, et al. CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells promote liver fibrosis resolution by inducing apoptosis of hepatic stellate cells. Nat Commun 2021;12:4474.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  67. You Z, Li Y, Wang Q, et al. The clinical significance of hepatic CD69+ CD103+ CD8+ resident-memory T cells in autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 2021;74:847-863.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  68. Zimmer CL, von Seth E, Buggert M, et al. A biliary immune landscape map of primary sclerosing cholangitis reveals a dominant network of neutrophils and tissue-resident T cells. Sci Transl Med 2021;13:eabb3107.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  69. Poch T, Krause J, Casar C, et al. Single-cell atlas of hepatic T cells reveals expansion of liver-resident naive-like CD4+ T cells in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol 2021;75:414-423.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  70. Huang B, Lyu Z, Qian Q, et al. NUDT1 promotes the accumulation and longevity of CD103+ TRM cells in primary biliary cholangitis. J Hepatol 2022;77:1311-1324.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  71. Goplen NP, Wu Y, Son YM, et al. Tissue-resident CD8+ T cells drive age-associated chronic lung sequelae after viral pneumonia. Sci Immunol 2020;5:eabc4557.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  72. Pallett LJ, Burton AR, Amin OE, et al. Longevity and replenishment of human liver-resident memory T cells and mononuclear phagocytes. J Exp Med 2020;217:e20200050.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  73. Epstein JE, Tewari K, Lyke KE, et al. Live attenuated malaria vaccine designed to protect through hepatic CD8+ T cell immunity. Science 2011;334:475-480.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  74. Moreno-Fernandez ME, Damen MS, Divanovic S. A protocol for isolation of primary human immune cells from the liver and mesenteric white adipose tissue biopsies. STAR Protoc 2021;2:100937.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  75. Bahrami E, Geiger T, Steixner-Kumar AA, et al. An optimized protocol for isolation of hepatic leukocytes retrieved from murine and NASH liver biopsies. STAR Protoc 2023;4:102597.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  76. Gill US, Pallett LJ, Thomas N, et al. Fine needle aspirates comprehensively sample intrahepatic immunity. Gut 2019;68:1493-1503.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  77. Rha MS, Han JW, Kim JH, et al. Human liver CD8+ MAIT cells exert TCR/MR1-independent innate-like cytotoxicity in response to IL-15. J Hepatol 2020;73:640-650.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  78. Koh JY, Rha MS, Choi SJ, et al. Identification of a distinct NK-like hepatic T-cell population activated by NKG2C in a TCR-independent manner. J Hepatol 2022;77:1059-1070.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  79. Rha MS, Han JW, Koh JY, et al. Impaired antibacterial response of liver sinusoidal Vγ9+Vδ2+ T cells in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut 2022;71:605-615.
    Pubmed CrossRef
Gut and Liver

Vol.19 No.2
March, 2025

pISSN 1976-2283
eISSN 2005-1212

qrcode
qrcode

Share this article on :

  • line

Popular Keywords

Gut and LiverQR code Download
qr-code

Editorial Office