Indexed In : Science Citation Index Expanded(SCIE), MEDLINE,
Pubmed/Pubmed Central, Elsevier Bibliographic, Google Scholar,
Databases(Scopus & Embase), KCI, KoreaMed, DOAJ
Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut atnd Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. +MORE
Yong Chan Lee |
Professor of Medicine Director, Gastrointestinal Research Laboratory Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Univ. California San Francisco San Francisco, USA |
Jong Pil Im | Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
Robert S. Bresalier | University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA |
Steven H. Itzkowitz | Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY, USA |
All papers submitted to Gut and Liver are reviewed by the editorial team before being sent out for an external peer review to rule out papers that have low priority, insufficient originality, scientific flaws, or the absence of a message of importance to the readers of the Journal. A decision about these papers will usually be made within two or three weeks.
The remaining articles are usually sent to two reviewers. It would be very helpful if you could suggest a selection of reviewers and include their contact details. We may not always use the reviewers you recommend, but suggesting reviewers will make our reviewer database much richer; in the end, everyone will benefit. We reserve the right to return manuscripts in which no reviewers are suggested.
The final responsibility for the decision to accept or reject lies with the editors. In many cases, papers may be rejected despite favorable reviews because of editorial policy or a lack of space. The editor retains the right to determine publication priorities, the style of the paper, and to request, if necessary, that the material submitted be shortened for publication.
Inbeom Kwon1, Dae Won Jun2 , Jin-Hwa Moon3
Correspondence to: Dae Won Jun (
Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, 222-1 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea,
Tel: +82-2-2290-8338, Fax: +82-2-2298-9183, E-mail: noshin@hanyang.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Gut Liver 2019;13(3):308-314. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl18175
Published online October 30, 2018, Published date May 31, 2019
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
Whether moderate alcohol intake is beneficial remains an unsolved issue. Recent studies have suggested that moderate alcohol consumption is associated with beneficial effects related to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Moderate alcohol consumption leads to a higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic viral liver diseases. However, the effects of moderate alcohol intake in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease are unclear. In this review, we analyzed, from various perspectives, the effect of moderate alcohol consumption in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. We reviewed four cohort studies and seven cross-sectional studies. The results showed that moderate alcohol consumption was negatively related to the incidence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis. However, moderate alcohol consumption was positively associated with the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The results of the analysis of the relationship between moderate alcohol consumption and the levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and hypertension were diverse. More clinical data are needed to draw a conclusion about the effects of moderate alcohol consumption in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Keywords: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Alcohol, Moderate drinking
Alcohol is an important cause of chronic liver disease. Chronic alcohol intake aggravates most liver diseases, and moderate alcohol intake may exacerbate certain liver diseases. For example, moderate alcohol consumption (60 g/day for men and 40 g/day for women) in patients with hepatitis B virus infection increased the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by about 1.5-fold,1–4 although the cutoff values of alcohol intake were unclear.4
However, effects of moderate alcohol consumption in specific liver diseases are still in debate. For example, many studies examined the effects of moderate alcohol consumption in the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In a study by Sogabe
Interestingly, there were some researches suggesting that nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and liver fibrosis were negatively associated with moderate alcohol consumption in patients with NAFLD, although NAFLD is similar to alcoholic fatty liver disease and has a similar pathological physiology.8 Previously, effects of moderate alcohol drinking in NAFLD patients were reviewed by Ajmera
To date, 11 studies were available on the effects of alcohol on liver disease progression in patients with NAFLD (Table 1).8,11–20 Four were cohort studies, and seven were cross-sectional studies. One cohort study suggested a negative correlation between moderate alcohol drinking and fibrosis,13 while another cohort study suggested no correlation.12 The longitudinal cohort study suggested less improvement of NAFLD in the consistent moderate alcohol drinking group.18 The other cohort study suggested even moderate alcohol drinking may exacerbate HCC development. 17
Three cross-sectional studies suggested that moderate alcohol drinking was negatively associated with the prevalence of NASH and advanced hepatic fibrosis.8,11,19 However, four cross-sectional studies suggested that moderate alcohol drinking was not associated with NASH progression and fibrosis deterioration. 14–16
Each study used various methods to analyze the alcohol intake of patients (Table 2). Eight studies obtained alcohol intake data through the self-reports of patients,8,11–13,16,18–20 and four studies interviewed patients through experts.11,12,14,16 Two studies used both the self-report method and the interview method.12,16 One study was unclear how alcohol consumption was analyzed. 17
In most studies, alcohol intake was measured at a specific time point. Two studies used the alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT) or AUDIT – consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaires. 8,12,18,20 However, AUDIT is intended to identify persons with hazardous and harmful patterns of alcohol consumption.21 This questionnaire consists of 10 questions, of which questions 1 to 3 are direct questions about the amount of alcohol consumption. AUDIT-C is a questionnaire that includes only these three questions. Therefore, AUDIT and AUDIT-C have limitations in accurately analyzing the amount or pattern of alcohol consumption. Only four studies included the lifetime drinking history of patients.8,11,13,18 A lifetime drinking history questionnaire was designed to record all alcohol consumptions up to the time the patient was asked. The items listed included drinking duration, a frequency of drinking, intake per serving, and type of alcohol.22 Including the lifetime drinking history is important because past drinking behavior can alter the patients’ current health status.
The definitions of moderate alcohol consumption were different in each article (Fig. 1). The lowest cutoff was 40 g/wk, and the highest was 308 g/wk. The mean was 167 g/wk. Excluding the outlying lowest cutoff value of Kwon
Eight studies showed the relationship between moderate alcohol intake and the degree of fibrosis (Table 3).8,11–13,15,16,18,20 Scoring system used to assess the degree of intrahepatic fibrosis were various. Five studies used the NASH Clinical Research Network scoring system for assessing the progression of NASH. Among them, four studies suggested that the level of liver fibrosis was low in patients with moderate alcohol consumption (p≤0.05),8,11,13,19 while the other study showed no correlation.18
Other three studies used different scoring systems. One study12 used the Brunt system to evaluate the degree of NAFLD.24 Another study15 used NAFLD fibrosis scores without biopsy to evaluate the degree of liver fibrosis.25 The other study20 used controlled attenuation parameter method to evaluate the degree of liver fibrosis. The three studies showed that moderate alcohol intake and fibrosis severity were not associated.12,15
Above finding changed after subgroup analysis according to types of study design. Among the eight studies, five were cross-sectional studies.8,11,15,19 Three of them showed the negative association between liver fibrosis and moderate alcohol consumption. 8,11,19 Only one study among the three cohort studies showed the negative association between liver fibrosis and moderate alcohol consumption.12,13,18
Interestingly, above finding was related to methods of assessing alcohol consumption. Most studies that evaluated lifetime drinking history suggested a negative association between liver fibrosis and moderate alcohol consumption,8,11,13,19 except for one study.18
Four studies suggested the effects of moderate alcohol intake on the incidence of intrahepatic inflammation in patients with NAFLD,8,13,16,18 however, the results were diverse (Table 4). Alcohol consumption of <20 g/day was negatively associated with the incidence of NASH (p=0.0006) in a study by Dunn
Seven articles suggested the relationship between alcohol consumption and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels.11,13–15,18–20 The AST levels were not different between moderate drinkers and nondrinkers in all seven studies (Table 5). While there was no difference of ALT levels between the two groups in most studies, ALT levels were lower in patients consuming <20 g/day of alcohol than in nondrinkers in one study. This study also suggested that ALT and AST levels were higher in patients consuming 20–40 g/day of alcohol.14
The effect of moderate alcohol intake on cholesterol levels in patients with NAFLD was controversial in the three studies (
Two studies suggested the relationship between moderate alcohol intake and hypertension in patients with NAFLD (
In conclusion, moderate alcohol intake in patients with NAFLD has varied results. However, moderate alcohol intake is associated with a low incidence of intrahepatic fibrosis and NASH despite variety and uncertainty on methods of assessing alcohol consumption.
Several studies demonstrated possible mechanisms for beneficial effects of moderate alcohol consumption. In the animal study by Kanuri
Yet, it may be early to recommend drinking to patients with NAFLD. Firstly, there were no randomized control trials and all studies were cross-sectional studies or cohort studies. Secondly, the effect of alcohol intake on liver cancer in patients with NAFLD is controversial. Among the 11 journals we reviewed, only one journal analyzed the effect of moderate alcohol drinking on the risk of HCC.17 The study used 308 g/wk as a cutoff value for the definition of moderate alcohol drinking. This is a much higher value compared to other journals we reviewed since the average was 167 g/wk. More clinical data is needed to further analyze the effect of moderate alcohol drinking on HCC development in the patient with NAFLD. Thirdly, the methods used for assessing alcohol consumption have many limitations. Fourthly, the longitudinal cohort study suggested that the modest alcohol use is associated with less improvement of NASH.18 Lastly, the amount of moderate alcohol consumption defined in each article was different. Clinical data are still lacking, and the conclusion cannot be drawn on how much alcohol is appropriate for each individual patient. Additional studies should be undertaken on the analysis of adequate alcohol intake, patterns of intake, and positive and negative effects.
Author contributions: guarantor of the article, D.W.J. D.W.J. contributed to the study design. I.K. wrote the manuscript. J.H.M. contributed to critical review and manuscript polishing.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Alcohol Consumption and Severity of Liver Disease in NAFLD
Author (year) | Study population | Study design | Sample size | Definition of moderate alcohol use | Method for determining NAFLD | Outcome measure | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kwon | USA, NAFLD | Cross-sectional | 77 (43 female) | ≤40 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Fibrosis stage, fibrosis score, ALT, AST, fibrosis score | Lower fibrosis score in the above-median alcohol consumption group |
Dunn | USA, NAFLD | Cross-sectional | 582 (384 female) | ≤140 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Fibrosis stage, steatohepatitis state | Lower risk for fibrosis and steatohepatitis in moderate alcohol consumption group |
Ekstedt | Scandinavia, NAFLD | Prospective cohort | 71 (20 female) | ≤140 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Fibrosis stage, ALT, AST | Heavy episodic drinking positively relates with higher fibrosis stage |
Hagström | Sweden, NAFLD | Prospective cohort | 120 (37 female) | ≤168 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Fibrosis stage, ALT, AST | Moderate alcohol consumption and fibrosis stage relates negatively |
Cotrim | Brazil, obese (BMI >40 kg/m2) | Cross-sectional | 132 (91 female) | ≤280 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Fibrosis stage, ALT, AST, IR | Alcohol and NAFLD severity had no correlation |
Sinn | Korea, NAFLD | Cross-sectional | 2280 (male only) | ≤140 g/wk | Ultrasound | Fibrosis score, ALT, AST, carotid plaque | Moderate alcohol consumption and carotid plaques formation relates negatively |
Dixon | Australia, obese | Cross-sectional | 105 (23 female) | ≤200 g/wk | Liver biopsy | ALT, AST | Less NASH probability in the moderate alcohol drinking group |
Ascha | USA | Retrospective cohort | 510 (183 female), NASH 195 (109 female) | ≤308 g/wk | Liver biopsy | HCC development | Alcohol consumption positively relates with risk of HCC |
Ajmera | NASH-CRN participants | Longitudinal cohort | 285 (199 female) | ≤140 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Resolution of definit NASH, Fibrosis score, ALT, AST | Less improvement of NAFLD in the consistent moderate alcohol drinking group |
Yamada | Japanese, NAFLD | Cross-sectional | 178 (85 female) | ≤140 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Fibrosis score, steatosis score | Less fibrosis score in the moderate alcohol drinking group |
Patel | Australian, diabetes and NAFLD | Cross-sectional | 151 (55 female) | ≤140 g/wk | Controlled attenuation parameter | Liver stiffness, ALT, AST | Alcohol consumption is not associated with lifer fibrosis in diabetic and NAFLD patients |
Method of Assessing Alcohol Consumption
Author (year) | Self-report/interview | Interview | Including life-time drinking patterns | Types of food frequency questionnaire |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kwon | O | O | Skinner Lifetime Drinking History interview | |
Dunn | O | O | Skinner Lifetime Drinking History and AUDIT questionnaires | |
Ekstedt | O | O | AUDIT-C questionnaire | |
Hagström | O | O | Skinner Lifetime Drinking History questionnaire | |
Cotrim | O | - | ||
Sinn | O | - | ||
Dixon | O | O | - | |
Ascha | Not clearly stated | |||
Ajmera | O | O | Skinner Lifetime Drinking History and AUDIT-C questionnaires | |
Yamada | O | - | ||
Patel | O | O | AUDIT questionnaires |
Effects of Moderate Alcohol Drinking on Liver Fibrosis
Author (year) | Fibrosis | Remarks |
---|---|---|
Kwon | ↓ | Fibrosis score (1.2±1.0 vs 1.8±1.2, p=0.03) among the above-median alcohol consumption versus below-median alcohol consumption groups |
Dunn | ↓ | Higher fibrosis stage: OR, 0.56 (95% CI, 0.41–0.78; p=0.0005) among moderate alcohol users versus lifelong nondrinkers |
Ekstedt | - | Fibrosis progression: OR, 1.012 (95% CI, 1.000–1.025; p=0.055) among alcohol users versus nondrinkers |
Hagström | ↓ | Higher fibrosis stage: OR, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77–0.97; p=0.016) among the above-median alcohol consumption versus below-median alcohol consumption groups |
Sinn | - | Fibrosis score (−1.9 vs −1.9; p=0.93) among moderate alcohol drinkers versus nondrinkers |
Ajmera | - | Change in fibrosis score (0.08±0.16 vs 0.06±0.18; p=0.85) among moderate alcohol drinkers versus nondrinkers |
Yamada | ↓ | Fibrosis score: OR, 0.707 (95% CI, 0.512–0.977; p=0.035) among moderate alcohol users versus lifelong nondrinkers |
Patel | - | Liver stiffness measurement over 0.82 kPa: OR, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.27–3.10; p=0.881) among moderate alcohol users versus lifelong nondrinkers |
Effects of Moderate Alcohol Drinking on NASH
Author (year) | NASH | Remarks |
---|---|---|
Dunn | ↓ | NASH: OR, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.36–0.76; p=0.0006) among moderate alcohol users versus lifelong non-drinkers |
Hagström | - | NASH: OR, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.86–1.11; p=0.71) among the above-median alcohol consumption versus below-median alcohol consumption groups |
Dixon | ↓ | NASH: OR, 0.35 (95% CI, 0.12–1.0; p=0.040) among moderate alcohol users versus lifelong non-drinkers before adjusting for diabetes or insulin resistance |
- | NASH after adjusting for diabetes or insulin resistance | |
Ajmera | ↓ | Definite NASH prevalence at the baseline (57% vs 74%, p=0.01) among moderate alcohol users versus lifelong nondrinkers |
↑ | Resolution of definite NASH after 4 years: difference in adjusted mean change, 0.32 (95% CI, 0.11–0.92; p=0.04) among consistent moderate drinkers and consistent nondrinkers |
Effects of Moderate Alcohol Drinking on ALT/AST
Author (year) | ALT | Conclusion, IU/L | AST | Conclusion, IU/L |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kwon | - | 78±37 vs 73±59, p=0.68; among the above-median alcohol consumption versus below-median alcohol consumption groups | - | 50±24 vs 56±43, p=0.44 |
Hagström | - | 61 vs 55, p=0.22; among moderate alcohol drinkers versus below-median drinkers | - | 44 vs 44, p=0.76 |
Cotrim | ↓ | 48 vs 30 vs 35; among G1 (20–40 g/day) vs G2 (0–20 g/day) vs G3 (nondrinkers) | - | 30 vs 23 vs 24 |
Sinn | - | 29 vs 28, p=0.11; among moderate alcohol drinkers versus nondrinkers | - | 24 vs 24, p=0.85 |
Ajmera | - | 62 vs 57, p=0.08; among moderate alcohol drinkers versus nondrinkers | - | 43 vs 42, p=0.37 |
Yamada | - | 68.5±49.8 vs 64.1±79.8, p=0.0610; among moderate alcohol drinkers versus nondrinkers | - | 40.1±22.9 vs 46.1±42.6, p=0.6993 |
Patel | - | 36.4±26.4 vs 38.4±29.5 vs 37.4±15.8; among nondrinkers versus light drinkers versus moderate drinkers | - | 29.0±17.6 vs 28.6±26.1 vs 24.7±11.2 |
Gut and Liver 2019; 13(3): 308-314
Published online May 31, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl18175
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
Inbeom Kwon1, Dae Won Jun2 , Jin-Hwa Moon3
1Department of Pre-Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, 2Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, 3Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to:Dae Won Jun (
Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, 222-1 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea,
Tel: +82-2-2290-8338, Fax: +82-2-2298-9183, E-mail: noshin@hanyang.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Whether moderate alcohol intake is beneficial remains an unsolved issue. Recent studies have suggested that moderate alcohol consumption is associated with beneficial effects related to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Moderate alcohol consumption leads to a higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic viral liver diseases. However, the effects of moderate alcohol intake in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease are unclear. In this review, we analyzed, from various perspectives, the effect of moderate alcohol consumption in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. We reviewed four cohort studies and seven cross-sectional studies. The results showed that moderate alcohol consumption was negatively related to the incidence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis. However, moderate alcohol consumption was positively associated with the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The results of the analysis of the relationship between moderate alcohol consumption and the levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and hypertension were diverse. More clinical data are needed to draw a conclusion about the effects of moderate alcohol consumption in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Keywords: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Alcohol, Moderate drinking
Alcohol is an important cause of chronic liver disease. Chronic alcohol intake aggravates most liver diseases, and moderate alcohol intake may exacerbate certain liver diseases. For example, moderate alcohol consumption (60 g/day for men and 40 g/day for women) in patients with hepatitis B virus infection increased the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by about 1.5-fold,1–4 although the cutoff values of alcohol intake were unclear.4
However, effects of moderate alcohol consumption in specific liver diseases are still in debate. For example, many studies examined the effects of moderate alcohol consumption in the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In a study by Sogabe
Interestingly, there were some researches suggesting that nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and liver fibrosis were negatively associated with moderate alcohol consumption in patients with NAFLD, although NAFLD is similar to alcoholic fatty liver disease and has a similar pathological physiology.8 Previously, effects of moderate alcohol drinking in NAFLD patients were reviewed by Ajmera
To date, 11 studies were available on the effects of alcohol on liver disease progression in patients with NAFLD (Table 1).8,11–20 Four were cohort studies, and seven were cross-sectional studies. One cohort study suggested a negative correlation between moderate alcohol drinking and fibrosis,13 while another cohort study suggested no correlation.12 The longitudinal cohort study suggested less improvement of NAFLD in the consistent moderate alcohol drinking group.18 The other cohort study suggested even moderate alcohol drinking may exacerbate HCC development. 17
Three cross-sectional studies suggested that moderate alcohol drinking was negatively associated with the prevalence of NASH and advanced hepatic fibrosis.8,11,19 However, four cross-sectional studies suggested that moderate alcohol drinking was not associated with NASH progression and fibrosis deterioration. 14–16
Each study used various methods to analyze the alcohol intake of patients (Table 2). Eight studies obtained alcohol intake data through the self-reports of patients,8,11–13,16,18–20 and four studies interviewed patients through experts.11,12,14,16 Two studies used both the self-report method and the interview method.12,16 One study was unclear how alcohol consumption was analyzed. 17
In most studies, alcohol intake was measured at a specific time point. Two studies used the alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT) or AUDIT – consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaires. 8,12,18,20 However, AUDIT is intended to identify persons with hazardous and harmful patterns of alcohol consumption.21 This questionnaire consists of 10 questions, of which questions 1 to 3 are direct questions about the amount of alcohol consumption. AUDIT-C is a questionnaire that includes only these three questions. Therefore, AUDIT and AUDIT-C have limitations in accurately analyzing the amount or pattern of alcohol consumption. Only four studies included the lifetime drinking history of patients.8,11,13,18 A lifetime drinking history questionnaire was designed to record all alcohol consumptions up to the time the patient was asked. The items listed included drinking duration, a frequency of drinking, intake per serving, and type of alcohol.22 Including the lifetime drinking history is important because past drinking behavior can alter the patients’ current health status.
The definitions of moderate alcohol consumption were different in each article (Fig. 1). The lowest cutoff was 40 g/wk, and the highest was 308 g/wk. The mean was 167 g/wk. Excluding the outlying lowest cutoff value of Kwon
Eight studies showed the relationship between moderate alcohol intake and the degree of fibrosis (Table 3).8,11–13,15,16,18,20 Scoring system used to assess the degree of intrahepatic fibrosis were various. Five studies used the NASH Clinical Research Network scoring system for assessing the progression of NASH. Among them, four studies suggested that the level of liver fibrosis was low in patients with moderate alcohol consumption (p≤0.05),8,11,13,19 while the other study showed no correlation.18
Other three studies used different scoring systems. One study12 used the Brunt system to evaluate the degree of NAFLD.24 Another study15 used NAFLD fibrosis scores without biopsy to evaluate the degree of liver fibrosis.25 The other study20 used controlled attenuation parameter method to evaluate the degree of liver fibrosis. The three studies showed that moderate alcohol intake and fibrosis severity were not associated.12,15
Above finding changed after subgroup analysis according to types of study design. Among the eight studies, five were cross-sectional studies.8,11,15,19 Three of them showed the negative association between liver fibrosis and moderate alcohol consumption. 8,11,19 Only one study among the three cohort studies showed the negative association between liver fibrosis and moderate alcohol consumption.12,13,18
Interestingly, above finding was related to methods of assessing alcohol consumption. Most studies that evaluated lifetime drinking history suggested a negative association between liver fibrosis and moderate alcohol consumption,8,11,13,19 except for one study.18
Four studies suggested the effects of moderate alcohol intake on the incidence of intrahepatic inflammation in patients with NAFLD,8,13,16,18 however, the results were diverse (Table 4). Alcohol consumption of <20 g/day was negatively associated with the incidence of NASH (p=0.0006) in a study by Dunn
Seven articles suggested the relationship between alcohol consumption and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels.11,13–15,18–20 The AST levels were not different between moderate drinkers and nondrinkers in all seven studies (Table 5). While there was no difference of ALT levels between the two groups in most studies, ALT levels were lower in patients consuming <20 g/day of alcohol than in nondrinkers in one study. This study also suggested that ALT and AST levels were higher in patients consuming 20–40 g/day of alcohol.14
The effect of moderate alcohol intake on cholesterol levels in patients with NAFLD was controversial in the three studies (
Two studies suggested the relationship between moderate alcohol intake and hypertension in patients with NAFLD (
In conclusion, moderate alcohol intake in patients with NAFLD has varied results. However, moderate alcohol intake is associated with a low incidence of intrahepatic fibrosis and NASH despite variety and uncertainty on methods of assessing alcohol consumption.
Several studies demonstrated possible mechanisms for beneficial effects of moderate alcohol consumption. In the animal study by Kanuri
Yet, it may be early to recommend drinking to patients with NAFLD. Firstly, there were no randomized control trials and all studies were cross-sectional studies or cohort studies. Secondly, the effect of alcohol intake on liver cancer in patients with NAFLD is controversial. Among the 11 journals we reviewed, only one journal analyzed the effect of moderate alcohol drinking on the risk of HCC.17 The study used 308 g/wk as a cutoff value for the definition of moderate alcohol drinking. This is a much higher value compared to other journals we reviewed since the average was 167 g/wk. More clinical data is needed to further analyze the effect of moderate alcohol drinking on HCC development in the patient with NAFLD. Thirdly, the methods used for assessing alcohol consumption have many limitations. Fourthly, the longitudinal cohort study suggested that the modest alcohol use is associated with less improvement of NASH.18 Lastly, the amount of moderate alcohol consumption defined in each article was different. Clinical data are still lacking, and the conclusion cannot be drawn on how much alcohol is appropriate for each individual patient. Additional studies should be undertaken on the analysis of adequate alcohol intake, patterns of intake, and positive and negative effects.
Author contributions: guarantor of the article, D.W.J. D.W.J. contributed to the study design. I.K. wrote the manuscript. J.H.M. contributed to critical review and manuscript polishing.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Table 1 Alcohol Consumption and Severity of Liver Disease in NAFLD
Author (year) | Study population | Study design | Sample size | Definition of moderate alcohol use | Method for determining NAFLD | Outcome measure | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kwon | USA, NAFLD | Cross-sectional | 77 (43 female) | ≤40 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Fibrosis stage, fibrosis score, ALT, AST, fibrosis score | Lower fibrosis score in the above-median alcohol consumption group |
Dunn | USA, NAFLD | Cross-sectional | 582 (384 female) | ≤140 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Fibrosis stage, steatohepatitis state | Lower risk for fibrosis and steatohepatitis in moderate alcohol consumption group |
Ekstedt | Scandinavia, NAFLD | Prospective cohort | 71 (20 female) | ≤140 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Fibrosis stage, ALT, AST | Heavy episodic drinking positively relates with higher fibrosis stage |
Hagström | Sweden, NAFLD | Prospective cohort | 120 (37 female) | ≤168 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Fibrosis stage, ALT, AST | Moderate alcohol consumption and fibrosis stage relates negatively |
Cotrim | Brazil, obese (BMI >40 kg/m2) | Cross-sectional | 132 (91 female) | ≤280 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Fibrosis stage, ALT, AST, IR | Alcohol and NAFLD severity had no correlation |
Sinn | Korea, NAFLD | Cross-sectional | 2280 (male only) | ≤140 g/wk | Ultrasound | Fibrosis score, ALT, AST, carotid plaque | Moderate alcohol consumption and carotid plaques formation relates negatively |
Dixon | Australia, obese | Cross-sectional | 105 (23 female) | ≤200 g/wk | Liver biopsy | ALT, AST | Less NASH probability in the moderate alcohol drinking group |
Ascha | USA | Retrospective cohort | 510 (183 female), NASH 195 (109 female) | ≤308 g/wk | Liver biopsy | HCC development | Alcohol consumption positively relates with risk of HCC |
Ajmera | NASH-CRN participants | Longitudinal cohort | 285 (199 female) | ≤140 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Resolution of definit NASH, Fibrosis score, ALT, AST | Less improvement of NAFLD in the consistent moderate alcohol drinking group |
Yamada | Japanese, NAFLD | Cross-sectional | 178 (85 female) | ≤140 g/wk | Liver biopsy | Fibrosis score, steatosis score | Less fibrosis score in the moderate alcohol drinking group |
Patel | Australian, diabetes and NAFLD | Cross-sectional | 151 (55 female) | ≤140 g/wk | Controlled attenuation parameter | Liver stiffness, ALT, AST | Alcohol consumption is not associated with lifer fibrosis in diabetic and NAFLD patients |
NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; IR, insulin resistance; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; NASH-CRN, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network.
Table 2 Method of Assessing Alcohol Consumption
Author (year) | Self-report/interview | Interview | Including life-time drinking patterns | Types of food frequency questionnaire |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kwon | O | O | Skinner Lifetime Drinking History interview | |
Dunn | O | O | Skinner Lifetime Drinking History and AUDIT questionnaires | |
Ekstedt | O | O | AUDIT-C questionnaire | |
Hagström | O | O | Skinner Lifetime Drinking History questionnaire | |
Cotrim | O | - | ||
Sinn | O | - | ||
Dixon | O | O | - | |
Ascha | Not clearly stated | |||
Ajmera | O | O | Skinner Lifetime Drinking History and AUDIT-C questionnaires | |
Yamada | O | - | ||
Patel | O | O | AUDIT questionnaires |
AUDIT, alcohol use disorder identification test; AUDIT-C, alcohol use disorder identification test-consumption.
Table 3 Effects of Moderate Alcohol Drinking on Liver Fibrosis
Author (year) | Fibrosis | Remarks |
---|---|---|
Kwon | ↓ | Fibrosis score (1.2±1.0 vs 1.8±1.2, p=0.03) among the above-median alcohol consumption versus below-median alcohol consumption groups |
Dunn | ↓ | Higher fibrosis stage: OR, 0.56 (95% CI, 0.41–0.78; p=0.0005) among moderate alcohol users versus lifelong nondrinkers |
Ekstedt | - | Fibrosis progression: OR, 1.012 (95% CI, 1.000–1.025; p=0.055) among alcohol users versus nondrinkers |
Hagström | ↓ | Higher fibrosis stage: OR, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77–0.97; p=0.016) among the above-median alcohol consumption versus below-median alcohol consumption groups |
Sinn | - | Fibrosis score (−1.9 vs −1.9; p=0.93) among moderate alcohol drinkers versus nondrinkers |
Ajmera | - | Change in fibrosis score (0.08±0.16 vs 0.06±0.18; p=0.85) among moderate alcohol drinkers versus nondrinkers |
Yamada | ↓ | Fibrosis score: OR, 0.707 (95% CI, 0.512–0.977; p=0.035) among moderate alcohol users versus lifelong nondrinkers |
Patel | - | Liver stiffness measurement over 0.82 kPa: OR, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.27–3.10; p=0.881) among moderate alcohol users versus lifelong nondrinkers |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Table 4 Effects of Moderate Alcohol Drinking on NASH
Author (year) | NASH | Remarks |
---|---|---|
Dunn | ↓ | NASH: OR, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.36–0.76; p=0.0006) among moderate alcohol users versus lifelong non-drinkers |
Hagström | - | NASH: OR, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.86–1.11; p=0.71) among the above-median alcohol consumption versus below-median alcohol consumption groups |
Dixon | ↓ | NASH: OR, 0.35 (95% CI, 0.12–1.0; p=0.040) among moderate alcohol users versus lifelong non-drinkers before adjusting for diabetes or insulin resistance |
- | NASH after adjusting for diabetes or insulin resistance | |
Ajmera | ↓ | Definite NASH prevalence at the baseline (57% vs 74%, p=0.01) among moderate alcohol users versus lifelong nondrinkers |
↑ | Resolution of definite NASH after 4 years: difference in adjusted mean change, 0.32 (95% CI, 0.11–0.92; p=0.04) among consistent moderate drinkers and consistent nondrinkers |
NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Table 5 Effects of Moderate Alcohol Drinking on ALT/AST
Author (year) | ALT | Conclusion, IU/L | AST | Conclusion, IU/L |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kwon | - | 78±37 vs 73±59, p=0.68; among the above-median alcohol consumption versus below-median alcohol consumption groups | - | 50±24 vs 56±43, p=0.44 |
Hagström | - | 61 vs 55, p=0.22; among moderate alcohol drinkers versus below-median drinkers | - | 44 vs 44, p=0.76 |
Cotrim | ↓ | 48 vs 30 vs 35; among G1 (20–40 g/day) vs G2 (0–20 g/day) vs G3 (nondrinkers) | - | 30 vs 23 vs 24 |
Sinn | - | 29 vs 28, p=0.11; among moderate alcohol drinkers versus nondrinkers | - | 24 vs 24, p=0.85 |
Ajmera | - | 62 vs 57, p=0.08; among moderate alcohol drinkers versus nondrinkers | - | 43 vs 42, p=0.37 |
Yamada | - | 68.5±49.8 vs 64.1±79.8, p=0.0610; among moderate alcohol drinkers versus nondrinkers | - | 40.1±22.9 vs 46.1±42.6, p=0.6993 |
Patel | - | 36.4±26.4 vs 38.4±29.5 vs 37.4±15.8; among nondrinkers versus light drinkers versus moderate drinkers | - | 29.0±17.6 vs 28.6±26.1 vs 24.7±11.2 |
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase.