Indexed In : Science Citation Index Expanded(SCIE), MEDLINE,
Pubmed/Pubmed Central, Elsevier Bibliographic, Google Scholar,
Databases(Scopus & Embase), KCI, KoreaMed, DOAJ
Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut atnd Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. +MORE
Yong Chan Lee |
Professor of Medicine Director, Gastrointestinal Research Laboratory Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Univ. California San Francisco San Francisco, USA |
Jong Pil Im | Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
Robert S. Bresalier | University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA |
Steven H. Itzkowitz | Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY, USA |
All papers submitted to Gut and Liver are reviewed by the editorial team before being sent out for an external peer review to rule out papers that have low priority, insufficient originality, scientific flaws, or the absence of a message of importance to the readers of the Journal. A decision about these papers will usually be made within two or three weeks.
The remaining articles are usually sent to two reviewers. It would be very helpful if you could suggest a selection of reviewers and include their contact details. We may not always use the reviewers you recommend, but suggesting reviewers will make our reviewer database much richer; in the end, everyone will benefit. We reserve the right to return manuscripts in which no reviewers are suggested.
The final responsibility for the decision to accept or reject lies with the editors. In many cases, papers may be rejected despite favorable reviews because of editorial policy or a lack of space. The editor retains the right to determine publication priorities, the style of the paper, and to request, if necessary, that the material submitted be shortened for publication.
Young Woon Chang*, Jae Young Jang*, Yong Ho Kim†, Jung-Wook Kim*, and Jae-Jun Shim*
*Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
†Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to: Jae Young Jang, Department of Gastroenterology, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-701, Korea, Tel: +82-2-958-8200, Fax: +82-2-958-1848, E-mail: jyjang@khu.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Gut Liver 2015;9(4):486-493. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl14040
Published online October 7, 2014, Published date July 31, 2015
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
The aims of this study were to investigate whether a broccoli sprout extract containing sulforaphane (BSES) inhibited the
The enrolled subjects were randomized in a double-blinded manner into three groups. Finally, 33
BSES treatment did not significantly affect the UBT values or ammonia concentration in group A (p=0.634 and p=0.505, respectively). BSES treatment did significantly reduce mucosal MDA concentrations in group A (p<0.05) and group C (p<0.001), whereas the gastric mucosal GSH concentrations did not differ before and after treatment in any of the groups.
BSES did not inhibit the
Keywords:
Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy is the most effective treatment for
Gastric mucosal damage in
Sulforaphane is a molecule within the isothiocyanate group of organosulfur compounds. It is obtained from cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, Brussels sprouts, or cabbages. Sulforaphane has strong bactericidal activity against
This prospective study investigated whether BSES inhibited
One hundred volunteer subjects with functional dyspepsia were randomized double blindly from March 2009 to October 2011. Medical history interviews were conducted in all participants, followed by a brief physical examination. Exclusion criteria were previous gastric surgery, peptic ulcer disease, gastric malignancy, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or anticoagulant drugs, and systemic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease. We included the subjects with nonatrophic erythematous gastritis (mild to moderate) in accordance with the updated Sydney system to avoid the bias of divergent gastritis patterns.19
We performed upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with measurements of urea breath test (UBT), malondialdehyde (MDA), and GSH concentration twice before and after intervention in all subjects. Follow-up examinations were performed within 1 week after taking all the BSES capsules. After an overnight fast, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and a UBT were performed. Sixty-seven of the 100 subjects were
In all instances, the 13C-UBT was performed on the first day after an overnight fast or at least after an 8-hour fast. A baseline breath sample was collected into a collection tube. An aliquot of 75 mg 13C-urea dissolved in 75 mL of citric acid solution was given orally (Helikit; Isodiagnostika, Edmonton, Canada). Another breath sample was collected after 30 minutes. Breath samples were subsequently analyzed by mass spectrometry to determine the 13C/12C ratio (HeliView; MediChems, Seoul, Korea). The 13C/12C ratio of each breath sample was expressed as a milli-percentage (‰). Changes in the 13C value compared to baseline were expressed as Δ13C. A positive result was defined as an increase >4‰.
Eighty-nine subjects underwent gastroscopy before and after BSES or placebo treatment. Upon entering the stomach, 10 to 20 mL of gastric juice were aspirated from the gastric fundus and collected in a trap. During the gastroscopic examination, one biopsy specimen was taken from the antrum, and four pieces were taken from the lower gastric corpus. The antral and one corpus biopsy specimen were submitted for a rapid urease test (CLO test; Green Cross Co., Seoul, Korea). The three remaining corpus mucosal tissues were used for measurement of MDA and GSH concentrations.
The ammonia concentration in gastric juice was used as an additional indicator of
The measurement of GSH was based on a chemical reaction that proceeds in two steps. The first step leads to the formation of thioethers between 4-chloro-1-methyl-7-trifluromethyl-quinolinium-methylsulfate and mercaptans. The second step is a β-elimination reaction, which takes place under alkaline conditions. Thioether reacts with GSH to form a chromophoric thione. Biopsy specimens from the gastric body mucosa for GSH determination were immediately frozen and stored at −70°C until analysis. Each sample was weighed and placed into 20 mL of 5-metaphosphoric acid for homogenization of the tissue. The homogenate was centrifuged at 3,000×
Measurement of MDA is widely used as an indicator of lipid peroxidation due to cellular injury. The principle is based on the reaction of a chromogenic reagent,
All data were analyzed using SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data were expressed as means±standard deviation (SD). Between-group differences were assessed by means of one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Comparison of the clinicopathological features was assessed using a two tailed chi-square test and independent sample t-test. In the analysis of MDA, GSH, UBT, and ammonia concentrations before and after BSES or placebo treatment, a paired t-test was used.
There were no significant differences in basic clinical features between the
In the
There were no statistically significant differences in basal mucosal MDA (p=0.083) and GSH (p=0.526) concentrations between the
In all 61
One of the alternative treatments for
Broccoli is another candidate supplement for
Sulforaphane is a potent bacteriostatic agent against
In this present study, subjects were instructed to consume BSES twice daily (2,000 μg sulforaphane) for 4 weeks. We measured both the ΔUBT value and ammonia concentration in gastric juice as indicators of
We found no significant changes in the ΔUBT value and ammonia concentration in gastric juice after sulforaphane treatment and no changes <50% of the basal level, except for in one subject. We cannot be certain that 4 weeks is sufficient to achieve any inhibitory effect. Therefore, studies with longer durations of sulforaphane treatment, such as 2 or 6 months, are warranted. Additionally, we plan to examine the effect of sulforaphane supplementation on the efficacy of standard triple first-line or quadruple second-line therapy against
We investigated whether sulforaphane had a cytoprotective effect on
Most human studies have demonstrated that
MDA is a product of lipid peroxidation and an indicator of oxidative cell injury. MDA concentrations in the gastric mucosa were significantly higher in subjects with
The results of this study should be interpreted in the context of several limitations. First, the number of subjects was small, although the antioxidative effect of BSES on gastric mucosal damage was informative. Second, we did not evaluate the long-term (i.e., more than 6 or 12 months) antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer effects of BSES. Third, we did not compare the relationship between changes in the MDA and GSH concentrations and histological changes in the gastric mucosa. Finally, we did not examine the supplementary effect of BSES on standard triple or quadruple therapy for
Although sulforaphane alone had no effect on the eradication or inhibition of
Basic Clinical Characteristics of the Subjects
Characteristic | Group A (n=33) | Group B (n=28) | Group C (n=28) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Male/female | 16/17 | 14/14 | 13/15 | 0.965 |
Age | 39.2±11.4 | 42.3±11.2 | 36.1±11.7 | 0.138 |
Alcohol | 19 (57.6) | 18 (64.3) | 16 (57.1) | 0.826 |
Smoking habits | 10 (30.3) | 8 (28.6) | 5 (17.9) | 0.501 |
Inhibitory Effect of Broccoli Sprout Extract Containing Sulforaphane on
Group A (n=33) | Group B (n=28) | p-value* | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before | After | p-value | Before | After | p-value | ||
ΔUBT, ‰ | 60.5±25.6 | 58.3±23.8 | 0.531 | 59.7±28.2 | 62.7±25.4 | 0.329 | 0.601 |
Ammonia, mmol/L | 9.3±4.4 | 9.6±4.5 | 0.505 | 10.1±5.7 | 10.7±5.5 | 0.224 | 0.270 |
50% decrease of ΔUBT value | 32 | 1† | - | 28 | 0 | - | - |
50% decrease of ammonia level | 33 | 0 | - | 28 | 0 | - | - |
Data are presented as mean±SD or number.
UBT, urea breath test.
†In only one subject in group A was the ΔUBT value below 50% of the basal level.
Basal Malondialdehyde and Glutathione Concentrations in
All | p-value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Basal MDA, nmol/g tissue | 151.4±109.2 | 112.7±60.9 | 0.083 |
Basal GSH, μmol/g tissue | 102.0±60.8 | 111.4±66.4 | 0.526 |
Antioxidative Effect of Broccoli Sprout Extract Containing Sulforaphane and Placebo in All Subjects
Before | After | ΔD | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MDA, nmol/g | ||||
Group A (n=33) | 147.8±127.8 | 74.7±53.1 | −73.0±143.1 | 0.006 |
Group B (n=28) | 155.7±84.3 | 144.8±57.3 | −10.9±53.3 | 0.289 |
Group C (n=28) | 112.7±60.9 | 71.7±46.1 | −41.0±46.5 | <0.001 |
GSH, μmol/g | ||||
Group A (n=33) | 99.8±70.5 | 109.9±82.5 | 10.1±91.8 | 0.532 |
Group B (n=28) | 104.5±48.0 | 110.3±47.4 | 5.8±35.1 | 0.391 |
Group C (n=28) | 111.4±66.4 | 118.5±64.3 | 7.1±27.0 | 0.178 |
Gut Liver 2015; 9(4): 486-493
Published online July 31, 2015 https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl14040
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
Young Woon Chang*, Jae Young Jang*, Yong Ho Kim†, Jung-Wook Kim*, and Jae-Jun Shim*
*Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
†Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to: Jae Young Jang, Department of Gastroenterology, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-701, Korea, Tel: +82-2-958-8200, Fax: +82-2-958-1848, E-mail: jyjang@khu.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The aims of this study were to investigate whether a broccoli sprout extract containing sulforaphane (BSES) inhibited the
The enrolled subjects were randomized in a double-blinded manner into three groups. Finally, 33
BSES treatment did not significantly affect the UBT values or ammonia concentration in group A (p=0.634 and p=0.505, respectively). BSES treatment did significantly reduce mucosal MDA concentrations in group A (p<0.05) and group C (p<0.001), whereas the gastric mucosal GSH concentrations did not differ before and after treatment in any of the groups.
BSES did not inhibit the
Keywords:
Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy is the most effective treatment for
Gastric mucosal damage in
Sulforaphane is a molecule within the isothiocyanate group of organosulfur compounds. It is obtained from cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, Brussels sprouts, or cabbages. Sulforaphane has strong bactericidal activity against
This prospective study investigated whether BSES inhibited
One hundred volunteer subjects with functional dyspepsia were randomized double blindly from March 2009 to October 2011. Medical history interviews were conducted in all participants, followed by a brief physical examination. Exclusion criteria were previous gastric surgery, peptic ulcer disease, gastric malignancy, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or anticoagulant drugs, and systemic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease. We included the subjects with nonatrophic erythematous gastritis (mild to moderate) in accordance with the updated Sydney system to avoid the bias of divergent gastritis patterns.19
We performed upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with measurements of urea breath test (UBT), malondialdehyde (MDA), and GSH concentration twice before and after intervention in all subjects. Follow-up examinations were performed within 1 week after taking all the BSES capsules. After an overnight fast, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and a UBT were performed. Sixty-seven of the 100 subjects were
In all instances, the 13C-UBT was performed on the first day after an overnight fast or at least after an 8-hour fast. A baseline breath sample was collected into a collection tube. An aliquot of 75 mg 13C-urea dissolved in 75 mL of citric acid solution was given orally (Helikit; Isodiagnostika, Edmonton, Canada). Another breath sample was collected after 30 minutes. Breath samples were subsequently analyzed by mass spectrometry to determine the 13C/12C ratio (HeliView; MediChems, Seoul, Korea). The 13C/12C ratio of each breath sample was expressed as a milli-percentage (‰). Changes in the 13C value compared to baseline were expressed as Δ13C. A positive result was defined as an increase >4‰.
Eighty-nine subjects underwent gastroscopy before and after BSES or placebo treatment. Upon entering the stomach, 10 to 20 mL of gastric juice were aspirated from the gastric fundus and collected in a trap. During the gastroscopic examination, one biopsy specimen was taken from the antrum, and four pieces were taken from the lower gastric corpus. The antral and one corpus biopsy specimen were submitted for a rapid urease test (CLO test; Green Cross Co., Seoul, Korea). The three remaining corpus mucosal tissues were used for measurement of MDA and GSH concentrations.
The ammonia concentration in gastric juice was used as an additional indicator of
The measurement of GSH was based on a chemical reaction that proceeds in two steps. The first step leads to the formation of thioethers between 4-chloro-1-methyl-7-trifluromethyl-quinolinium-methylsulfate and mercaptans. The second step is a β-elimination reaction, which takes place under alkaline conditions. Thioether reacts with GSH to form a chromophoric thione. Biopsy specimens from the gastric body mucosa for GSH determination were immediately frozen and stored at −70°C until analysis. Each sample was weighed and placed into 20 mL of 5-metaphosphoric acid for homogenization of the tissue. The homogenate was centrifuged at 3,000×
Measurement of MDA is widely used as an indicator of lipid peroxidation due to cellular injury. The principle is based on the reaction of a chromogenic reagent,
All data were analyzed using SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data were expressed as means±standard deviation (SD). Between-group differences were assessed by means of one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Comparison of the clinicopathological features was assessed using a two tailed chi-square test and independent sample t-test. In the analysis of MDA, GSH, UBT, and ammonia concentrations before and after BSES or placebo treatment, a paired t-test was used.
There were no significant differences in basic clinical features between the
In the
There were no statistically significant differences in basal mucosal MDA (p=0.083) and GSH (p=0.526) concentrations between the
In all 61
One of the alternative treatments for
Broccoli is another candidate supplement for
Sulforaphane is a potent bacteriostatic agent against
In this present study, subjects were instructed to consume BSES twice daily (2,000 μg sulforaphane) for 4 weeks. We measured both the ΔUBT value and ammonia concentration in gastric juice as indicators of
We found no significant changes in the ΔUBT value and ammonia concentration in gastric juice after sulforaphane treatment and no changes <50% of the basal level, except for in one subject. We cannot be certain that 4 weeks is sufficient to achieve any inhibitory effect. Therefore, studies with longer durations of sulforaphane treatment, such as 2 or 6 months, are warranted. Additionally, we plan to examine the effect of sulforaphane supplementation on the efficacy of standard triple first-line or quadruple second-line therapy against
We investigated whether sulforaphane had a cytoprotective effect on
Most human studies have demonstrated that
MDA is a product of lipid peroxidation and an indicator of oxidative cell injury. MDA concentrations in the gastric mucosa were significantly higher in subjects with
The results of this study should be interpreted in the context of several limitations. First, the number of subjects was small, although the antioxidative effect of BSES on gastric mucosal damage was informative. Second, we did not evaluate the long-term (i.e., more than 6 or 12 months) antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer effects of BSES. Third, we did not compare the relationship between changes in the MDA and GSH concentrations and histological changes in the gastric mucosa. Finally, we did not examine the supplementary effect of BSES on standard triple or quadruple therapy for
Although sulforaphane alone had no effect on the eradication or inhibition of
Table 1 Basic Clinical Characteristics of the Subjects
Characteristic | Group A (n=33) | Group B (n=28) | Group C (n=28) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Male/female | 16/17 | 14/14 | 13/15 | 0.965 |
Age | 39.2±11.4 | 42.3±11.2 | 36.1±11.7 | 0.138 |
Alcohol | 19 (57.6) | 18 (64.3) | 16 (57.1) | 0.826 |
Smoking habits | 10 (30.3) | 8 (28.6) | 5 (17.9) | 0.501 |
Data are presented as mean±SD or number (%).
Group A,
Table 2 Inhibitory Effect of Broccoli Sprout Extract Containing Sulforaphane on
Group A (n=33) | Group B (n=28) | p-value* | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before | After | p-value | Before | After | p-value | ||
ΔUBT, ‰ | 60.5±25.6 | 58.3±23.8 | 0.531 | 59.7±28.2 | 62.7±25.4 | 0.329 | 0.601 |
Ammonia, mmol/L | 9.3±4.4 | 9.6±4.5 | 0.505 | 10.1±5.7 | 10.7±5.5 | 0.224 | 0.270 |
50% decrease of ΔUBT value | 32 | 1† | - | 28 | 0 | - | - |
50% decrease of ammonia level | 33 | 0 | - | 28 | 0 | - | - |
Data are presented as mean±SD or number.
UBT, urea breath test.
†In only one subject in group A was the ΔUBT value below 50% of the basal level.
Table 3 Basal Malondialdehyde and Glutathione Concentrations in
All | p-value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Basal MDA, nmol/g tissue | 151.4±109.2 | 112.7±60.9 | 0.083 |
Basal GSH, μmol/g tissue | 102.0±60.8 | 111.4±66.4 | 0.526 |
Data are presented as mean±SD.
MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH, glutathione.
Table 4 Antioxidative Effect of Broccoli Sprout Extract Containing Sulforaphane and Placebo in All Subjects
Before | After | ΔD | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MDA, nmol/g | ||||
Group A (n=33) | 147.8±127.8 | 74.7±53.1 | −73.0±143.1 | 0.006 |
Group B (n=28) | 155.7±84.3 | 144.8±57.3 | −10.9±53.3 | 0.289 |
Group C (n=28) | 112.7±60.9 | 71.7±46.1 | −41.0±46.5 | <0.001 |
GSH, μmol/g | ||||
Group A (n=33) | 99.8±70.5 | 109.9±82.5 | 10.1±91.8 | 0.532 |
Group B (n=28) | 104.5±48.0 | 110.3±47.4 | 5.8±35.1 | 0.391 |
Group C (n=28) | 111.4±66.4 | 118.5±64.3 | 7.1±27.0 | 0.178 |
Data are presented as mean±SD. ΔD was the difference before and after treatment. p-values were calculated by paired t-tests, before and after treatment, in each group. When comparing the ΔD between groups A and B, the p-values were 0.026 for MDA and 0.804 for GSH. When comparing the ΔD between group A+C and group B, the p-values were 0.034 for MDA and 0.834 for GSH.
MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH, glutathione.