Indexed In : Science Citation Index Expanded(SCIE), MEDLINE,
Pubmed/Pubmed Central, Elsevier Bibliographic, Google Scholar,
Databases(Scopus & Embase), KCI, KoreaMed, DOAJ
Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut atnd Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. +MORE
Yong Chan Lee |
Professor of Medicine Director, Gastrointestinal Research Laboratory Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Univ. California San Francisco San Francisco, USA |
Jong Pil Im | Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
Robert S. Bresalier | University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA |
Steven H. Itzkowitz | Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY, USA |
All papers submitted to Gut and Liver are reviewed by the editorial team before being sent out for an external peer review to rule out papers that have low priority, insufficient originality, scientific flaws, or the absence of a message of importance to the readers of the Journal. A decision about these papers will usually be made within two or three weeks.
The remaining articles are usually sent to two reviewers. It would be very helpful if you could suggest a selection of reviewers and include their contact details. We may not always use the reviewers you recommend, but suggesting reviewers will make our reviewer database much richer; in the end, everyone will benefit. We reserve the right to return manuscripts in which no reviewers are suggested.
The final responsibility for the decision to accept or reject lies with the editors. In many cases, papers may be rejected despite favorable reviews because of editorial policy or a lack of space. The editor retains the right to determine publication priorities, the style of the paper, and to request, if necessary, that the material submitted be shortened for publication.
Kyoung Ah Jung*, Hyun Ju Min**, Seung Suk Yoo*, Hong Jun Kim*, Su Nyoung Choi*, Chang Yoon Ha*, Hyun Jin Kim*, Tae Hyo Kim*, Woon Tae Jung*, Ok Jae Lee*, Jong Sil Lee†, and Sang Goon Shim‡
*Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
†Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
‡Department of Ineternal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea.
Correspondence to: Hyun Ju Min. Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, 90 Chilam-dong, Jinju 660-702, Korea. Tel: +82-55-750-8885, Fax: +82-55-758-9122, lyreju@naver.com
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Gut Liver 2011;5(4):493-499. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2011.5.4.493
Published online November 21, 2011, Published date December 31, 2011
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
Complementary medicines, including herbal preparations and nutritional supplements, are widely used without prescriptions. As a result, there has been growing interest in the risk of hepatotoxicity with these agents. It is difficult to determine causal relationships between these herbal preparations and hepatotoxicity. We report on 25 patients diagnosed with toxic hepatitis following ingestion of
Twenty-five patients (median age, 48 years [24 to 65 years]; M:F=18:7) with suspected
The types of complementary medicine used included tea (n=16), liquor (n=5), tea and liquor (n=2), powder (n=1), and honeyed pudding (n=1). The most common presenting sign was jaundice (76%), and 18 patients (72%) had evidence of hepatocellular liver injury. Histological findings were consistent with acute hepatitis in all cases (n=10) for which liver biopsy was performed. Twenty-three patients (91.6%) recovered with conservative management, 1 patient (4%) had a liver transplant, and 1 patient (4%) died of hepatic failure.
In our cases, we found that
Keywords: Drug induced liver injury,
Drug induced liver injury (DILI) is an adverse drug reaction associated with commonly used drugs, mostly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol, and antimicrobial agents.1 In some reports, more than a 1,000 drugs of the modern pharmacopoeia can induce liver injury with different clinical presentations.2,3 Diagnosis of DILI is difficult and data on the incidence of DILI cases are extremely variable due to a lack of internationally accepted criteria of DILI.4-6 DILI associated with herbal preparations is not uncommon in Western and Asian societies.7-11 DILI caused by a single plant taken as a nutritional supplement has been occasionally reported. Whereas, it has not been reported to be caused by herbal preparations consisting of multiple plants.12,13 Many people understand that natural botanicals are beneficial but not harmful. However, natural botanicals can be also causes of DILI,13 because herbal medicine induced liver injury is caused by its metabolites as well as natural botanicals.
We describe 25 cases of hepatitis caused by
This study entailed collection and analyses of clinical information using questionnaires and laboratory results in 25 patients diagnosed with
The patient characteristics and outcomes were summarized in Table 1.
The patients consisted of 18 men and 7 women. Their age ranged between 24 and 65, with a median age of 48.
The main clinical manifestations leading to patient admissions were as follows: jaundice (19 cases), abdominal pain with nausea (2 cases), fatigue (2 cases), and myalgia (1 case), and no symptom (1 case). During the hospitalization 5 patients developed fever, arthralgia in 2 patients, eosinophilia in 1 patient and skin rash in 2 patients.
Sixteen patients drank tea boiled with the root of the
At the time of admission 24 patients showed markedly elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT; >10×UNL) and 9 had remarkably elevated total bilirubin (>20 mg/dL). In patients who presented to our hospital via private hospitals, we included their initial laboratory data in private hospitals. Eighteen patients had hepatocelluar liver injury and the remainder of the patients including 1 alcoholics had mixed pattern liver injury according to laboratory data. Four patients had prolonged prothrombin time (international normalized ratio [INR] >1.2) and 2 of them had an INR of 9.56 and 14.98, respectively. Serologic markers were all negative: HBsAg(-), IgM Anti-HBc(-), IgM Anti-HAV(-), Anti-HCV(-), HCV-PCR(-), anti-CMV(-), EBV IgM(-), EBV IgG(-), FANA(-), anti-smooth muscle Ab(-), anti-mitochondrial Ab(-). Iron, TIBC, ceruloplasmin, α-1 antitrypsin and IgG were within the normal range. Based on these results we could exclude other causes of acute hepatitis. The mean score of Council of International Organizations of Medical Scientists (CIOMS) or RUCAM was 8 (range, 6-10).
Liver biopsy was conducted in 9 individuals during hospital stay. One patient progressed to fulminant hepatitis and eventually received liver transplantation, which enabled us to obtain the liver specimen that demonstrated the extent of organ injury. Among the 13 individuals in whom liver biopsy was not performed due to rapid clinical improvement or outright refusal against the procedure, 1 patient died of rapid progressing hepatic failure. Of 2 patients with alcoholic liver disease, liver biopsy was conducted in one patient which demonstrated periportal and perivenular neutrophilic infiltration, fatty change, apoptotic body, bridging necrosis and fibrosis, indicative of toxic hepatitis mixed with alcoholic hepatitis (Fig. 1). The histological findings of the remaining 8 patients demonstrated inflammatory cell infiltration, necrosis of hepatic cells and mild to moderate cholestasis consistent with drug or toxin induced acute hepatitis (Fig. 2). The patient who received liver transplantation showed diffuse necrosis of hepatic cells (Fig. 3).
Patients ceased taking
One patient (case 1) had taken one bottle of Soju (360 cc) daily for 20 years, which had about 20 percent alcohol content, who had ceased alcohol intake 3 months prior to hospitalization. He rapidly progressed to hepatic failure after hospitalization, and on the fourth day of admission brain computed tomography demonstrated hepatic encephalopathy and cerebral edema. He refused liver transplantation and then developed acute renal failure on the eighth day of admission and died on the 13th day of admission (Fig. 4A). As the patient had ceased alcohol intake 3 months prior to hospitalization before the intake of
We put a premium on the patient in case 19, who developed liver injury by rechallenge of
DILI is defined as biochemical injury to the liver proven to be caused by intake of a drug within the previous three months. The diagnosis is established when other causes of the liver disease are excluded. DILI is characterized by the tendency to improve following discontinuation of the offending drug, which recurs after recommencement.21,22 However, the study of DILI is still difficult and controversial due to its lack of the reliability of serologic or histological tests to make a definite diagnosis. The articles recently reported showed unsatisfactory results regarding the reliability of RUCAM.23 A comparative study with respect to expert opinions and RUCAM revealed that the former was better in the diagnostic concordance.24 However, we do not have many researches to support this yet. Until now the most important method to make a diagnosis of DILI is to rule out other causes of liver injury for the patients with a history of medications or herbal medicines that have hepatotoxicity. Like the preceding diagnosis of DILI was based on the author's opinions and the RUCAM scale, and thus some controversy still exists in this study.
As interests in health grows, herbal preparations and plants become widely consumed by people all over the world, including Korea.25,26 Polygonaciae is generally known to be safe and not all who consume it develop liver injury. The patients enrolled in this study were symptomatic and were examined medically, except for one patient. In most cases of asymptomatic hepatitis following ingestion of
The patients had a history of having ingested
Given that liver injury was dose-independent and the time interval from
Herbal preparations and dietary supplements are widely consumed in many countries under the assumption that they are natural and therefore safe.13,19,29 Consumers are unaware that they can potentially be hazardous to their health. As
Our study is worthy of notice for 3 main reasons. First, the patient in case 19 is all the more meaningful in that it can be a direct evidence for the causal relationship between liver injury and
In summary, this study was derived from the author's experiences of managing liver injuries induced by
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TB, total bilirubin; PT, prothrombin time; PMT,
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TB, total bilirubin; PMT,
CIOMS, Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences; RUCAM, Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TB, total bilirubin; PT, prothrombin time; INR, international normalized ratio; LT, liver transplantation.
*Warfarinized patient.
*Warfarinized patient.
Gut Liver 2011; 5(4): 493-499
Published online December 31, 2011 https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2011.5.4.493
Copyright © Gut and Liver.
Kyoung Ah Jung*, Hyun Ju Min**, Seung Suk Yoo*, Hong Jun Kim*, Su Nyoung Choi*, Chang Yoon Ha*, Hyun Jin Kim*, Tae Hyo Kim*, Woon Tae Jung*, Ok Jae Lee*, Jong Sil Lee†, and Sang Goon Shim‡
*Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
†Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
‡Department of Ineternal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea.
Correspondence to: Hyun Ju Min. Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, 90 Chilam-dong, Jinju 660-702, Korea. Tel: +82-55-750-8885, Fax: +82-55-758-9122, lyreju@naver.com
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Complementary medicines, including herbal preparations and nutritional supplements, are widely used without prescriptions. As a result, there has been growing interest in the risk of hepatotoxicity with these agents. It is difficult to determine causal relationships between these herbal preparations and hepatotoxicity. We report on 25 patients diagnosed with toxic hepatitis following ingestion of
Twenty-five patients (median age, 48 years [24 to 65 years]; M:F=18:7) with suspected
The types of complementary medicine used included tea (n=16), liquor (n=5), tea and liquor (n=2), powder (n=1), and honeyed pudding (n=1). The most common presenting sign was jaundice (76%), and 18 patients (72%) had evidence of hepatocellular liver injury. Histological findings were consistent with acute hepatitis in all cases (n=10) for which liver biopsy was performed. Twenty-three patients (91.6%) recovered with conservative management, 1 patient (4%) had a liver transplant, and 1 patient (4%) died of hepatic failure.
In our cases, we found that
Keywords: Drug induced liver injury,
Drug induced liver injury (DILI) is an adverse drug reaction associated with commonly used drugs, mostly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol, and antimicrobial agents.1 In some reports, more than a 1,000 drugs of the modern pharmacopoeia can induce liver injury with different clinical presentations.2,3 Diagnosis of DILI is difficult and data on the incidence of DILI cases are extremely variable due to a lack of internationally accepted criteria of DILI.4-6 DILI associated with herbal preparations is not uncommon in Western and Asian societies.7-11 DILI caused by a single plant taken as a nutritional supplement has been occasionally reported. Whereas, it has not been reported to be caused by herbal preparations consisting of multiple plants.12,13 Many people understand that natural botanicals are beneficial but not harmful. However, natural botanicals can be also causes of DILI,13 because herbal medicine induced liver injury is caused by its metabolites as well as natural botanicals.
We describe 25 cases of hepatitis caused by
This study entailed collection and analyses of clinical information using questionnaires and laboratory results in 25 patients diagnosed with
The patient characteristics and outcomes were summarized in Table 1.
The patients consisted of 18 men and 7 women. Their age ranged between 24 and 65, with a median age of 48.
The main clinical manifestations leading to patient admissions were as follows: jaundice (19 cases), abdominal pain with nausea (2 cases), fatigue (2 cases), and myalgia (1 case), and no symptom (1 case). During the hospitalization 5 patients developed fever, arthralgia in 2 patients, eosinophilia in 1 patient and skin rash in 2 patients.
Sixteen patients drank tea boiled with the root of the
At the time of admission 24 patients showed markedly elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT; >10×UNL) and 9 had remarkably elevated total bilirubin (>20 mg/dL). In patients who presented to our hospital via private hospitals, we included their initial laboratory data in private hospitals. Eighteen patients had hepatocelluar liver injury and the remainder of the patients including 1 alcoholics had mixed pattern liver injury according to laboratory data. Four patients had prolonged prothrombin time (international normalized ratio [INR] >1.2) and 2 of them had an INR of 9.56 and 14.98, respectively. Serologic markers were all negative: HBsAg(-), IgM Anti-HBc(-), IgM Anti-HAV(-), Anti-HCV(-), HCV-PCR(-), anti-CMV(-), EBV IgM(-), EBV IgG(-), FANA(-), anti-smooth muscle Ab(-), anti-mitochondrial Ab(-). Iron, TIBC, ceruloplasmin, α-1 antitrypsin and IgG were within the normal range. Based on these results we could exclude other causes of acute hepatitis. The mean score of Council of International Organizations of Medical Scientists (CIOMS) or RUCAM was 8 (range, 6-10).
Liver biopsy was conducted in 9 individuals during hospital stay. One patient progressed to fulminant hepatitis and eventually received liver transplantation, which enabled us to obtain the liver specimen that demonstrated the extent of organ injury. Among the 13 individuals in whom liver biopsy was not performed due to rapid clinical improvement or outright refusal against the procedure, 1 patient died of rapid progressing hepatic failure. Of 2 patients with alcoholic liver disease, liver biopsy was conducted in one patient which demonstrated periportal and perivenular neutrophilic infiltration, fatty change, apoptotic body, bridging necrosis and fibrosis, indicative of toxic hepatitis mixed with alcoholic hepatitis (Fig. 1). The histological findings of the remaining 8 patients demonstrated inflammatory cell infiltration, necrosis of hepatic cells and mild to moderate cholestasis consistent with drug or toxin induced acute hepatitis (Fig. 2). The patient who received liver transplantation showed diffuse necrosis of hepatic cells (Fig. 3).
Patients ceased taking
One patient (case 1) had taken one bottle of Soju (360 cc) daily for 20 years, which had about 20 percent alcohol content, who had ceased alcohol intake 3 months prior to hospitalization. He rapidly progressed to hepatic failure after hospitalization, and on the fourth day of admission brain computed tomography demonstrated hepatic encephalopathy and cerebral edema. He refused liver transplantation and then developed acute renal failure on the eighth day of admission and died on the 13th day of admission (Fig. 4A). As the patient had ceased alcohol intake 3 months prior to hospitalization before the intake of
We put a premium on the patient in case 19, who developed liver injury by rechallenge of
DILI is defined as biochemical injury to the liver proven to be caused by intake of a drug within the previous three months. The diagnosis is established when other causes of the liver disease are excluded. DILI is characterized by the tendency to improve following discontinuation of the offending drug, which recurs after recommencement.21,22 However, the study of DILI is still difficult and controversial due to its lack of the reliability of serologic or histological tests to make a definite diagnosis. The articles recently reported showed unsatisfactory results regarding the reliability of RUCAM.23 A comparative study with respect to expert opinions and RUCAM revealed that the former was better in the diagnostic concordance.24 However, we do not have many researches to support this yet. Until now the most important method to make a diagnosis of DILI is to rule out other causes of liver injury for the patients with a history of medications or herbal medicines that have hepatotoxicity. Like the preceding diagnosis of DILI was based on the author's opinions and the RUCAM scale, and thus some controversy still exists in this study.
As interests in health grows, herbal preparations and plants become widely consumed by people all over the world, including Korea.25,26 Polygonaciae is generally known to be safe and not all who consume it develop liver injury. The patients enrolled in this study were symptomatic and were examined medically, except for one patient. In most cases of asymptomatic hepatitis following ingestion of
The patients had a history of having ingested
Given that liver injury was dose-independent and the time interval from
Herbal preparations and dietary supplements are widely consumed in many countries under the assumption that they are natural and therefore safe.13,19,29 Consumers are unaware that they can potentially be hazardous to their health. As
Our study is worthy of notice for 3 main reasons. First, the patient in case 19 is all the more meaningful in that it can be a direct evidence for the causal relationship between liver injury and
In summary, this study was derived from the author's experiences of managing liver injuries induced by
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TB, total bilirubin; PT, prothrombin time; PMT,
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TB, total bilirubin; PMT,
Table 1 Patient Characteristics and Outcomes
CIOMS, Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences; RUCAM, Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; TB, total bilirubin; PT, prothrombin time; INR, international normalized ratio; LT, liver transplantation.
*Warfarinized patient.
*Warfarinized patient.